特定客户范围经济从何而来?显性偏好分析

Olivier Chatain
{"title":"特定客户范围经济从何而来?显性偏好分析","authors":"Olivier Chatain","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1550980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cross-selling – selling multiple products or services to a buyer – is a common practice in business-to-business markets. In this paper, I exploit the preferences revealed in the relationships between buyers and suppliers to investigate the origin and magnitude of client-specific economies of scope. I use data from the UK corporate legal market to estimate the relative importance of cost, product line expertise and client-specific scope economies in the creation of economic value.I find evidence of a large opportunity cost of terminating a buyer-supplier relationship. Moreover, scope extensions are associated with less value creation at lower levels of scope. The losses tend to be reduced as scope increases. These findings suggest two sources of increasing returns. The first is the existence of a large cost of creating a new relationship. The second is supplier's ability to reduce the costs associated with delivering a new line of product to an existing buyer, above and beyond the cost of creating the relationship.In addition to these findings, this paper contributes to the literature on value-based models of strategy by showing how their underlying logic can be leveraged for empirical research and applications.","PeriodicalId":279826,"journal":{"name":"Atlanta Competitive Advantage Conference 2010 (Archive)","volume":"1995 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Where Do Client-Specific Scope Economies Come from? A Revealed Preference Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Olivier Chatain\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1550980\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cross-selling – selling multiple products or services to a buyer – is a common practice in business-to-business markets. In this paper, I exploit the preferences revealed in the relationships between buyers and suppliers to investigate the origin and magnitude of client-specific economies of scope. I use data from the UK corporate legal market to estimate the relative importance of cost, product line expertise and client-specific scope economies in the creation of economic value.I find evidence of a large opportunity cost of terminating a buyer-supplier relationship. Moreover, scope extensions are associated with less value creation at lower levels of scope. The losses tend to be reduced as scope increases. These findings suggest two sources of increasing returns. The first is the existence of a large cost of creating a new relationship. The second is supplier's ability to reduce the costs associated with delivering a new line of product to an existing buyer, above and beyond the cost of creating the relationship.In addition to these findings, this paper contributes to the literature on value-based models of strategy by showing how their underlying logic can be leveraged for empirical research and applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":279826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atlanta Competitive Advantage Conference 2010 (Archive)\",\"volume\":\"1995 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atlanta Competitive Advantage Conference 2010 (Archive)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1550980\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atlanta Competitive Advantage Conference 2010 (Archive)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1550980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

交叉销售——向买家出售多种产品或服务——是企业对企业市场的一种常见做法。在本文中,我利用买家和供应商之间关系中揭示的偏好来调查客户特定范围经济的起源和规模。我使用来自英国企业法律市场的数据来估计成本、产品线专业知识和特定客户范围经济在创造经济价值方面的相对重要性。我发现终止买卖关系的机会成本很高的证据。此外,范围扩展与范围较低层次上较少的价值创造相关联。随着范围的扩大,损失往往会减少。这些发现表明了收益增加的两个来源。首先,建立新关系的成本很高。其次是供应商降低向现有买家交付新产品线的相关成本的能力,这超出了建立关系的成本。除了这些发现之外,本文还通过展示其潜在逻辑如何用于实证研究和应用,为基于价值的战略模型的文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Where Do Client-Specific Scope Economies Come from? A Revealed Preference Analysis
Cross-selling – selling multiple products or services to a buyer – is a common practice in business-to-business markets. In this paper, I exploit the preferences revealed in the relationships between buyers and suppliers to investigate the origin and magnitude of client-specific economies of scope. I use data from the UK corporate legal market to estimate the relative importance of cost, product line expertise and client-specific scope economies in the creation of economic value.I find evidence of a large opportunity cost of terminating a buyer-supplier relationship. Moreover, scope extensions are associated with less value creation at lower levels of scope. The losses tend to be reduced as scope increases. These findings suggest two sources of increasing returns. The first is the existence of a large cost of creating a new relationship. The second is supplier's ability to reduce the costs associated with delivering a new line of product to an existing buyer, above and beyond the cost of creating the relationship.In addition to these findings, this paper contributes to the literature on value-based models of strategy by showing how their underlying logic can be leveraged for empirical research and applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Power of Imperfect Imitation Where Do Client-Specific Scope Economies Come from? A Revealed Preference Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1