两种典型RAID-6码在单盘故障在线恢复中的评价

Q. Cao, Shenggang Wan, Chentao Wu, Shenghui Zhan
{"title":"两种典型RAID-6码在单盘故障在线恢复中的评价","authors":"Q. Cao, Shenggang Wan, Chentao Wu, Shenghui Zhan","doi":"10.1109/NAS.2010.64","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Redundant Arrays of Independent Disks RAID is a popular storage architecture with high performance and reliability. RAID-6 with a higher level of reliability based on MDS (Maximum Distance Separable) code is well studied, for its optimal storage efficiency. RAID-6 could offer continuous services in degraded mode, during the period of online failure recovery. However, the online recovery would bring a considerable I/O workflow to the storage system, that almost all the surviving data in the system need to be accessed. Due to the limitation of disk bandwidth, user response time would be significantly affected by the recovery workflow. In this paper, we examine the online recovery performance of two typical MDS RAID-6 codes RDP code and P-code. To our observation, P-code significiantly outperforms RDP in user response time and recovery duration during a single disk failure recovery. To our analysis, the difference comes from not only the parity layout but also the parity organization. Therefore, we propose a new categorization for existing MDS RAID-6 codes, based on the methodology of parity organization. By our approach, all the MDS RAID-6 codes could be categorized to Sym-codes with only one type of parity, and Asym-codes with at least two different types of parity.","PeriodicalId":284549,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Networking, Architecture, and Storage","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Evaluation of Two Typical RAID-6 Codes on Online Single Disk Failure Recovery\",\"authors\":\"Q. Cao, Shenggang Wan, Chentao Wu, Shenghui Zhan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NAS.2010.64\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Redundant Arrays of Independent Disks RAID is a popular storage architecture with high performance and reliability. RAID-6 with a higher level of reliability based on MDS (Maximum Distance Separable) code is well studied, for its optimal storage efficiency. RAID-6 could offer continuous services in degraded mode, during the period of online failure recovery. However, the online recovery would bring a considerable I/O workflow to the storage system, that almost all the surviving data in the system need to be accessed. Due to the limitation of disk bandwidth, user response time would be significantly affected by the recovery workflow. In this paper, we examine the online recovery performance of two typical MDS RAID-6 codes RDP code and P-code. To our observation, P-code significiantly outperforms RDP in user response time and recovery duration during a single disk failure recovery. To our analysis, the difference comes from not only the parity layout but also the parity organization. Therefore, we propose a new categorization for existing MDS RAID-6 codes, based on the methodology of parity organization. By our approach, all the MDS RAID-6 codes could be categorized to Sym-codes with only one type of parity, and Asym-codes with at least two different types of parity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":284549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Networking, Architecture, and Storage\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Networking, Architecture, and Storage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAS.2010.64\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Networking, Architecture, and Storage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAS.2010.64","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

独立磁盘冗余阵列(Redundant Arrays of Independent Disks) RAID是一种高性能、高可靠性的流行存储架构。基于MDS (Maximum Distance separated code,最大距离可分离码)编码的可靠性更高的RAID-6被广泛研究,以获得最佳的存储效率。在在线故障恢复期间,RAID-6可以在降级模式下提供连续服务。但是,在线恢复会给存储系统带来相当大的I/O工作流程,几乎需要访问系统中所有幸存的数据。由于磁盘带宽的限制,用户的响应时间会受到恢复工作流的显著影响。本文研究了两种典型的MDS RAID-6码(RDP码和p码)的在线恢复性能。根据我们的观察,在单个磁盘故障恢复期间,P-code在用户响应时间和恢复持续时间方面明显优于RDP。在我们的分析中,差异不仅来自奇偶校验布局,还来自奇偶校验组织。因此,我们提出了一种基于奇偶组织方法的MDS RAID-6代码的新分类方法。通过我们的方法,所有MDS RAID-6代码都可以分为只有一种奇偶校验的符号码和至少有两种不同奇偶校验的非对称码。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Evaluation of Two Typical RAID-6 Codes on Online Single Disk Failure Recovery
Redundant Arrays of Independent Disks RAID is a popular storage architecture with high performance and reliability. RAID-6 with a higher level of reliability based on MDS (Maximum Distance Separable) code is well studied, for its optimal storage efficiency. RAID-6 could offer continuous services in degraded mode, during the period of online failure recovery. However, the online recovery would bring a considerable I/O workflow to the storage system, that almost all the surviving data in the system need to be accessed. Due to the limitation of disk bandwidth, user response time would be significantly affected by the recovery workflow. In this paper, we examine the online recovery performance of two typical MDS RAID-6 codes RDP code and P-code. To our observation, P-code significiantly outperforms RDP in user response time and recovery duration during a single disk failure recovery. To our analysis, the difference comes from not only the parity layout but also the parity organization. Therefore, we propose a new categorization for existing MDS RAID-6 codes, based on the methodology of parity organization. By our approach, all the MDS RAID-6 codes could be categorized to Sym-codes with only one type of parity, and Asym-codes with at least two different types of parity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Heterogeneous Multi-core Parallel SGEMM Performance Testing and Analysis on Cell/B.E Processor Stabilizing Path Modification of Power-Aware On/Off Interconnection Networks Modelling Speculative Prefetching for Hybrid Storage Systems Binomial Probability Redundancy Strategy for Multimedia Transmission Fast and Memory-Efficient Traffic Classification with Deep Packet Inspection in CMP Architecture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1