戴德金逻辑主义中的逻辑

E. Reck
{"title":"戴德金逻辑主义中的逻辑","authors":"E. Reck","doi":"10.4324/9781351182249-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Any history of logic from Kant to the 20th century needs to take into account the emergence of logicism, since it is largely in this context that logic as we know it became prominent. Usually Gottlob Frege and Bertrand Russell are seen as its two main representatives, especially early on, and the more recent rise of neo-logicism, in writings by Crispin Wright, Bob Hale and others, proceeds along Fregean lines as well. In this chapter, I will focus on Richard Dedekind instead. Today Dedekind is sometimes mentioned in connection with logicism; yet at the end of the 19th century, he was the most prominent logicist, ahead of Frege. This alone invites further reflection. Reconsidering Dedekind also leads naturally to questions about what was, or could be, understood by “logic” in this context. Addressing them will involve developments in 19thcentury mathematics that are relevant in two respects: by forming core parts of the background for the emergence of modern logic; and by pointing towards a distinction between two conceptions of logic that deserve more attention, both historically and philosophically.","PeriodicalId":118047,"journal":{"name":"Logic from Kant to Russell","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Logic in Dedekind’s Logicism\",\"authors\":\"E. Reck\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781351182249-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Any history of logic from Kant to the 20th century needs to take into account the emergence of logicism, since it is largely in this context that logic as we know it became prominent. Usually Gottlob Frege and Bertrand Russell are seen as its two main representatives, especially early on, and the more recent rise of neo-logicism, in writings by Crispin Wright, Bob Hale and others, proceeds along Fregean lines as well. In this chapter, I will focus on Richard Dedekind instead. Today Dedekind is sometimes mentioned in connection with logicism; yet at the end of the 19th century, he was the most prominent logicist, ahead of Frege. This alone invites further reflection. Reconsidering Dedekind also leads naturally to questions about what was, or could be, understood by “logic” in this context. Addressing them will involve developments in 19thcentury mathematics that are relevant in two respects: by forming core parts of the background for the emergence of modern logic; and by pointing towards a distinction between two conceptions of logic that deserve more attention, both historically and philosophically.\",\"PeriodicalId\":118047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Logic from Kant to Russell\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Logic from Kant to Russell\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351182249-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logic from Kant to Russell","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351182249-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从康德到20世纪的任何逻辑学历史都需要考虑到逻辑主义的出现,因为我们所知道的逻辑在很大程度上是在这种背景下变得突出的。通常戈特洛布·弗雷格和伯特兰·罗素被视为其两个主要代表,尤其是在早期,而最近新逻辑主义的兴起,在克里斯平·赖特、鲍勃·黑尔和其他人的作品中,也沿着弗雷格的路线发展。在这一章中,我将把重点放在理查德·戴德金身上。今天,戴德金德有时与逻辑主义联系在一起;但在19世纪末,他是领先于弗雷格的最杰出的逻辑学家。仅这一点就值得进一步思考。重新考虑Dedekind也自然会引出这样的问题:在这种情况下,“逻辑”能够理解什么。解决这些问题将涉及19世纪数学的发展,这在两个方面是相关的:通过形成现代逻辑出现的背景的核心部分;通过指出两个逻辑概念之间的区别,这两个概念在历史上和哲学上都值得注意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Logic in Dedekind’s Logicism
Any history of logic from Kant to the 20th century needs to take into account the emergence of logicism, since it is largely in this context that logic as we know it became prominent. Usually Gottlob Frege and Bertrand Russell are seen as its two main representatives, especially early on, and the more recent rise of neo-logicism, in writings by Crispin Wright, Bob Hale and others, proceeds along Fregean lines as well. In this chapter, I will focus on Richard Dedekind instead. Today Dedekind is sometimes mentioned in connection with logicism; yet at the end of the 19th century, he was the most prominent logicist, ahead of Frege. This alone invites further reflection. Reconsidering Dedekind also leads naturally to questions about what was, or could be, understood by “logic” in this context. Addressing them will involve developments in 19thcentury mathematics that are relevant in two respects: by forming core parts of the background for the emergence of modern logic; and by pointing towards a distinction between two conceptions of logic that deserve more attention, both historically and philosophically.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Demystifying Cohen’s Logik What Russell Meant When He Called Moore a Logician Kant’s Excessive Tenderness for Things in the World, and Hegel’s Dialetheism Hegel’s Conception of Thinking in His Logics The Logic in Dedekind’s Logicism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1