[使用ENTEROtest 1和2以及ENTERO-Rapid系统鉴定肠道细菌]。

Ceskoslovenska epidemiologie, mikrobiologie, imunologie Pub Date : 1992-08-01

I Sedlácek, E Pakrová

{"title":"[使用ENTEROtest 1和2以及ENTERO-Rapid系统鉴定肠道细菌]。","authors":"I Sedlácek, E Pakrová","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The identification efficacy of two systems, ENTEROtest 1 & 2 and ENTERO-Rapid (fy. Lachema a. c., Brno), was compared. A total 123 well known strains of enteric bacteria were tested. The ENTEROtest 1 & 2 system correctly identified 87.0% tested strains to the species level, the ENTERO-Rapid system correctly identified 76.4% of these strains.","PeriodicalId":75687,"journal":{"name":"Ceskoslovenska epidemiologie, mikrobiologie, imunologie","volume":"41 3","pages":"145-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Identification of enteric bacteria using the ENTEROtest 1 and 2 and the ENTERO-Rapid systems].\",\"authors\":\"I Sedlácek, E Pakrová\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The identification efficacy of two systems, ENTEROtest 1 & 2 and ENTERO-Rapid (fy. Lachema a. c., Brno), was compared. A total 123 well known strains of enteric bacteria were tested. The ENTEROtest 1 & 2 system correctly identified 87.0% tested strains to the species level, the ENTERO-Rapid system correctly identified 76.4% of these strains.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ceskoslovenska epidemiologie, mikrobiologie, imunologie\",\"volume\":\"41 3\",\"pages\":\"145-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ceskoslovenska epidemiologie, mikrobiologie, imunologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ceskoslovenska epidemiologie, mikrobiologie, imunologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

ENTEROtest 1 & 2和ENTERO-Rapid (fy)两种系统的识别效果。Lachema a.c, Brno)进行了比较。共检测了123株已知的肠道细菌。ENTEROtest 1和2系统在种水平上正确识别87.0%的被试菌株，ENTERO-Rapid系统正确识别76.4%的被试菌株。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

[Identification of enteric bacteria using the ENTEROtest 1 and 2 and the ENTERO-Rapid systems].

The identification efficacy of two systems, ENTEROtest 1 & 2 and ENTERO-Rapid (fy. Lachema a. c., Brno), was compared. A total 123 well known strains of enteric bacteria were tested. The ENTEROtest 1 & 2 system correctly identified 87.0% tested strains to the species level, the ENTERO-Rapid system correctly identified 76.4% of these strains.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Ceskoslovenska epidemiologie, mikrobiologie, imunologie

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊最新文献

Campylobacter Infections [Hepatitis C antibodies in health personnel]. [Actinomyces viscosus in subdural empyema]. [The effect of N,N'-bis(decyldimethyl)-1,6-hexane diammonium dibromide on vegetative cells and spores of type A Clostridium perfringens]. [Unusual causes of chromomycosis].