逃离模型:科学出版如何变坏(演示幻灯片)

J. Whitmore
{"title":"逃离模型:科学出版如何变坏(演示幻灯片)","authors":"J. Whitmore","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3554480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, many published findings in science could not be reproduced. These publications turned out to be low quality despite having good p-values. Several measures to replace p-values have been proposed, including an incredibility index (Schimmack, 2012), meta-regression (Stanley &amp; Doucouliagos, 2014). However, the real root cause of the souring of p-values is publication pressure. In that case, the newer measures will also eventually also go sour under publicaiton pressure. The problem of measuring science quality is actually just a specific case of a more general observation: Measures of behavior go sour (seem to work but actually not work) once pressure is placed on them to control people. So how do we fix science publication? There are two choices:<br><br>1. Reduce the pressure on scientists to publish. Produce fewer social science PhDs and make alternatives to tenure-track work more palatable (not adjunct hell).<br><br>2. Learn more about other systems with escape from measures. I discuss co-evolutionary hotspots and how spammers escape spam detectors.","PeriodicalId":281936,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Decision-Making under Risk & Uncertainty (Topic)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Escape From Models: How Science Publishing Went Sour (Presentation Slides)\",\"authors\":\"J. Whitmore\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3554480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, many published findings in science could not be reproduced. These publications turned out to be low quality despite having good p-values. Several measures to replace p-values have been proposed, including an incredibility index (Schimmack, 2012), meta-regression (Stanley &amp; Doucouliagos, 2014). However, the real root cause of the souring of p-values is publication pressure. In that case, the newer measures will also eventually also go sour under publicaiton pressure. The problem of measuring science quality is actually just a specific case of a more general observation: Measures of behavior go sour (seem to work but actually not work) once pressure is placed on them to control people. So how do we fix science publication? There are two choices:<br><br>1. Reduce the pressure on scientists to publish. Produce fewer social science PhDs and make alternatives to tenure-track work more palatable (not adjunct hell).<br><br>2. Learn more about other systems with escape from measures. I discuss co-evolutionary hotspots and how spammers escape spam detectors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":281936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Decision-Making under Risk & Uncertainty (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Decision-Making under Risk & Uncertainty (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3554480\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Decision-Making under Risk & Uncertainty (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3554480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,许多已发表的科学发现无法被复制。尽管这些出版物的p值很好,但结果证明它们的质量很低。已经提出了几种替代p值的措施,包括难以置信指数(Schimmack, 2012),元回归(Stanley &Doucouliagos, 2014)。然而,p值恶化的真正根本原因是出版压力。在这种情况下,新的措施最终也会在出版压力下失效。衡量科学质量的问题实际上只是一个更普遍观察的具体案例:行为的衡量标准一旦受到控制人们的压力,就会变坏(似乎有效,但实际上不起作用)。那么,我们如何修复科学出版物呢?有两种选择:1。减轻科学家发表论文的压力。培养更少的社会科学博士,让终身职位以外的工作更容易被接受(而不是沦为地狱)。了解更多关于其他有逃逸措施的系统。我将讨论共同进化热点以及垃圾邮件发送者如何逃脱垃圾邮件检测器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Escape From Models: How Science Publishing Went Sour (Presentation Slides)
In recent years, many published findings in science could not be reproduced. These publications turned out to be low quality despite having good p-values. Several measures to replace p-values have been proposed, including an incredibility index (Schimmack, 2012), meta-regression (Stanley & Doucouliagos, 2014). However, the real root cause of the souring of p-values is publication pressure. In that case, the newer measures will also eventually also go sour under publicaiton pressure. The problem of measuring science quality is actually just a specific case of a more general observation: Measures of behavior go sour (seem to work but actually not work) once pressure is placed on them to control people. So how do we fix science publication? There are two choices:

1. Reduce the pressure on scientists to publish. Produce fewer social science PhDs and make alternatives to tenure-track work more palatable (not adjunct hell).

2. Learn more about other systems with escape from measures. I discuss co-evolutionary hotspots and how spammers escape spam detectors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Demand for Retirement Products: An Analysis of Individual Welfare Preferences with Costly Bayesian Learning Problemistic Search of the Embedded Firm: The Joint Effects of Performance Feedback and Network Positions on Venture Capital Firms’ Risk Taking Who Owns What? A Factor Model for Direct Stockholding Expected Utility, Independence, and Continuity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1