回归基础——重新定义混合软件开发组织的质量度量

Satyabrata Pradhan, Venky Nanniyur
{"title":"回归基础——重新定义混合软件开发组织的质量度量","authors":"Satyabrata Pradhan, Venky Nanniyur","doi":"10.1109/ISSRE.2019.00047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the software industry transitions from a license-based model to a subscription-based Software-as-aService (SaaS) model, many software development groups are using a hybrid development model that incorporates Agile and Waterfall methodologies in different parts of the organization. The traditional metrics used for measuring software quality in Waterfall or Agile paradigms do not apply to this new hybrid methodology. In addition, to respond to higher quality demands from customers and to gain a competitive advantage in the market, many companies are starting to prioritize quality as a strategic differentiator. As a result, quality metrics are included in the decision-making activities all the way up to the executive level, including Board of Director reviews. This paper presents key challenges associated with measuring software quality in organizations using the hybrid development model. We developed a framework called PIER (Prevention-InspectionEvaluation-Removal) to provide a comprehensive metric definition for hybrid organizations. The framework includes quality measurements, quality enforcement, and quality decision points at different organizational levels and project milestones during the software development life cycle (SDLC). The metrics framework defined in this paper is being used for all Cisco Systems products used in customer premises. Preliminary field metrics data for one of the product groups show quality improvement after implementation of the proposed measurement system.","PeriodicalId":254749,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 30th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Back to Basics - Redefining Quality Measurement for Hybrid Software Development Organizations\",\"authors\":\"Satyabrata Pradhan, Venky Nanniyur\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISSRE.2019.00047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As the software industry transitions from a license-based model to a subscription-based Software-as-aService (SaaS) model, many software development groups are using a hybrid development model that incorporates Agile and Waterfall methodologies in different parts of the organization. The traditional metrics used for measuring software quality in Waterfall or Agile paradigms do not apply to this new hybrid methodology. In addition, to respond to higher quality demands from customers and to gain a competitive advantage in the market, many companies are starting to prioritize quality as a strategic differentiator. As a result, quality metrics are included in the decision-making activities all the way up to the executive level, including Board of Director reviews. This paper presents key challenges associated with measuring software quality in organizations using the hybrid development model. We developed a framework called PIER (Prevention-InspectionEvaluation-Removal) to provide a comprehensive metric definition for hybrid organizations. The framework includes quality measurements, quality enforcement, and quality decision points at different organizational levels and project milestones during the software development life cycle (SDLC). The metrics framework defined in this paper is being used for all Cisco Systems products used in customer premises. Preliminary field metrics data for one of the product groups show quality improvement after implementation of the proposed measurement system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE 30th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE 30th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSRE.2019.00047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 30th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSRE.2019.00047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

随着软件行业从基于许可的模型过渡到基于订阅的软件即服务(SaaS)模型,许多软件开发团队正在使用混合开发模型,该模型在组织的不同部分结合了敏捷和瀑布方法。瀑布或敏捷范例中用于度量软件质量的传统度量标准不适用于这种新的混合方法。此外,为了响应客户对质量的更高要求,并在市场上获得竞争优势,许多公司开始优先考虑质量作为战略差异化因素。结果,质量度量被包括在决策活动中,一直到执行级别,包括董事会的审查。本文提出了在使用混合开发模型的组织中与度量软件质量相关的关键挑战。我们开发了一个名为PIER(预防-检查-评估-移除)的框架,为混合型组织提供了一个全面的度量定义。该框架包括软件开发生命周期(SDLC)中不同组织级别和项目里程碑上的质量度量、质量实施和质量决策点。本文中定义的度量框架被用于客户场所中使用的所有思科系统产品。其中一个产品组的初步现场度量数据显示,在实施拟议的测量系统后,质量得到了改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Back to Basics - Redefining Quality Measurement for Hybrid Software Development Organizations
As the software industry transitions from a license-based model to a subscription-based Software-as-aService (SaaS) model, many software development groups are using a hybrid development model that incorporates Agile and Waterfall methodologies in different parts of the organization. The traditional metrics used for measuring software quality in Waterfall or Agile paradigms do not apply to this new hybrid methodology. In addition, to respond to higher quality demands from customers and to gain a competitive advantage in the market, many companies are starting to prioritize quality as a strategic differentiator. As a result, quality metrics are included in the decision-making activities all the way up to the executive level, including Board of Director reviews. This paper presents key challenges associated with measuring software quality in organizations using the hybrid development model. We developed a framework called PIER (Prevention-InspectionEvaluation-Removal) to provide a comprehensive metric definition for hybrid organizations. The framework includes quality measurements, quality enforcement, and quality decision points at different organizational levels and project milestones during the software development life cycle (SDLC). The metrics framework defined in this paper is being used for all Cisco Systems products used in customer premises. Preliminary field metrics data for one of the product groups show quality improvement after implementation of the proposed measurement system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inferring Performance Bug Patterns from Developer Commits Learning Marked Markov Modulated Poisson Processes for Online Predictive Analysis of Attack Scenarios An Empirical Study of Common Challenges in Developing Deep Learning Applications Evaluation of Anomaly Detection Algorithms Made Easy with RELOAD ISSRE 2019 External Reviewers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1