回复:胶囊内窥镜检查前的放射学评估能预测胶囊潴留吗?

Badr Al-Bawardy, J. Fletcher, E. Rajan, S. Hansel
{"title":"回复:胶囊内窥镜检查前的放射学评估能预测胶囊潴留吗?","authors":"Badr Al-Bawardy, J. Fletcher, E. Rajan, S. Hansel","doi":"10.1097/MIB.0000000000000762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To the Editor: We read with interest the recent article published by Al-Bawardy et al. The authors presented a large cohort of 5593 cases undergoing capsule endoscopy (CE), of whom 0.3% retentions occurred and they concluded that small bowel anastomosis and obstruction may be radiologic predictors of capsule retention. We would like to commend the authors on reporting the large study and endeavoring to define radiologic findings predictive of retention. However, we believe that there are several limitations in this study to which we wish to add our consideration. First, the manufacturers of the CE were not presented in the article, as over the last decade, there were 5 types of CE, including Given Imaging (Yokneam, Israel), Olympus EndoCapsule (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), OMOM pill (Jinshan, Chongqing, China), MiroCam (Seoul, Korea), and CapsoCam (Saratoga, CA), each of which may differ in dimension, field of view, image storing speed, and mode of data transmission. Second, in this study, computed tomography (CT) or computed tomography enterography (CTE) for patients with CE retention and for controls was compared, and CT or CTE was performed within 6 months before CE; however, the condition and patency of the small bowel may change during the period not more than 6 months, especially for those with Crohn’s disease. Third, as shown in Table 2 in their study, 2 cases were retained in the stomach of the 17 retentions, actually cases retained in the stomach can be checked with the tracking system of the CE. In our department, for cases retained in the stomach, gastroscope is used to help pushing the CE into the duodenum if the CE does not enter the duodenum within 2 hours. Finally, we do agree with the authors that careful review of surgical history and imaging before CE may help reduce capsule retention. Nevertheless, capsule retention can also occur even when the CT was normal. Conventional CT often missed the significant strictures and were poor predictors of capsule retention, CTE, and magnetic resonance enterography improving distention of small bowel may be more effective in predicting capsule retention. In summary, until now, no accurate methods can avoid capsule retention absolutely. We believe that previous radiologic evaluation before CE, such as CTE and magnetic resonance enterography, may help predict capsule retention. Further large prospective study is needed to confirm the accuracy of radiologic evaluation predictive of capsule retention.","PeriodicalId":339644,"journal":{"name":"Inflammatory Bowel Disease","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reply to: Can Radiologic Evaluation Before Capsule Endoscopy Predict Capsule Retention?\",\"authors\":\"Badr Al-Bawardy, J. Fletcher, E. Rajan, S. Hansel\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MIB.0000000000000762\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To the Editor: We read with interest the recent article published by Al-Bawardy et al. The authors presented a large cohort of 5593 cases undergoing capsule endoscopy (CE), of whom 0.3% retentions occurred and they concluded that small bowel anastomosis and obstruction may be radiologic predictors of capsule retention. We would like to commend the authors on reporting the large study and endeavoring to define radiologic findings predictive of retention. However, we believe that there are several limitations in this study to which we wish to add our consideration. First, the manufacturers of the CE were not presented in the article, as over the last decade, there were 5 types of CE, including Given Imaging (Yokneam, Israel), Olympus EndoCapsule (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), OMOM pill (Jinshan, Chongqing, China), MiroCam (Seoul, Korea), and CapsoCam (Saratoga, CA), each of which may differ in dimension, field of view, image storing speed, and mode of data transmission. Second, in this study, computed tomography (CT) or computed tomography enterography (CTE) for patients with CE retention and for controls was compared, and CT or CTE was performed within 6 months before CE; however, the condition and patency of the small bowel may change during the period not more than 6 months, especially for those with Crohn’s disease. Third, as shown in Table 2 in their study, 2 cases were retained in the stomach of the 17 retentions, actually cases retained in the stomach can be checked with the tracking system of the CE. In our department, for cases retained in the stomach, gastroscope is used to help pushing the CE into the duodenum if the CE does not enter the duodenum within 2 hours. Finally, we do agree with the authors that careful review of surgical history and imaging before CE may help reduce capsule retention. Nevertheless, capsule retention can also occur even when the CT was normal. Conventional CT often missed the significant strictures and were poor predictors of capsule retention, CTE, and magnetic resonance enterography improving distention of small bowel may be more effective in predicting capsule retention. In summary, until now, no accurate methods can avoid capsule retention absolutely. We believe that previous radiologic evaluation before CE, such as CTE and magnetic resonance enterography, may help predict capsule retention. Further large prospective study is needed to confirm the accuracy of radiologic evaluation predictive of capsule retention.\",\"PeriodicalId\":339644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inflammatory Bowel Disease\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inflammatory Bowel Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MIB.0000000000000762\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammatory Bowel Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MIB.0000000000000762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

致编辑:我们饶有兴趣地阅读了al - bawardy等人最近发表的一篇文章。作者提出了5593例接受胶囊内窥镜检查(CE)的大队列研究,其中0.3%的病例发生了保留,他们得出结论,小肠吻合和梗阻可能是胶囊保留的放射学预测因素。我们要赞扬作者报告了这项大型研究,并努力确定预测潴留的放射学结果。然而,我们认为这项研究有几个限制,我们希望对此加以考虑。首先,本文没有介绍CE的制造商,因为在过去十年中,有五种类型的CE,包括Given Imaging(以色列Yokneam), Olympus EndoCapsule(日本东京Olympus), OMOM pill(中国重庆金山),MiroCam(韩国首尔)和CapsoCam(加利福尼亚州萨拉托加),每种类型的CE在尺寸,视场,图像存储速度和数据传输模式上可能有所不同。其次,在本研究中,比较了CE保留患者和对照组的CT或CTE,并在CE前6个月内进行CT或CTE检查;然而,小肠的状况和通畅可能在不超过6个月的时间内发生变化,特别是对于克罗恩病患者。第三,在他们的研究中如表2所示,17例保留物中有2例保留在胃中,实际上保留在胃中的病例可以通过CE的跟踪系统进行检查。在我科,对于保留在胃内的病例,如果CE在2小时内没有进入十二指肠,则使用胃镜帮助将CE推入十二指肠。最后,我们同意作者的观点,即CE前仔细回顾手术史和影像学可能有助于减少胶囊潴留。然而,即使CT正常,也可能发生囊潴留。传统的CT常常错过了重要的狭窄,并且不能很好地预测胶囊潴留,CTE和磁共振肠造影改善小肠膨胀可能更有效地预测胶囊潴留。综上所述,到目前为止,还没有准确的方法可以完全避免胶囊潴留。我们认为,CE前的放射学评估,如CTE和磁共振肠造影,可能有助于预测胶囊潴留。需要进一步的大型前瞻性研究来证实预测胶囊潴留的放射学评估的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reply to: Can Radiologic Evaluation Before Capsule Endoscopy Predict Capsule Retention?
To the Editor: We read with interest the recent article published by Al-Bawardy et al. The authors presented a large cohort of 5593 cases undergoing capsule endoscopy (CE), of whom 0.3% retentions occurred and they concluded that small bowel anastomosis and obstruction may be radiologic predictors of capsule retention. We would like to commend the authors on reporting the large study and endeavoring to define radiologic findings predictive of retention. However, we believe that there are several limitations in this study to which we wish to add our consideration. First, the manufacturers of the CE were not presented in the article, as over the last decade, there were 5 types of CE, including Given Imaging (Yokneam, Israel), Olympus EndoCapsule (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), OMOM pill (Jinshan, Chongqing, China), MiroCam (Seoul, Korea), and CapsoCam (Saratoga, CA), each of which may differ in dimension, field of view, image storing speed, and mode of data transmission. Second, in this study, computed tomography (CT) or computed tomography enterography (CTE) for patients with CE retention and for controls was compared, and CT or CTE was performed within 6 months before CE; however, the condition and patency of the small bowel may change during the period not more than 6 months, especially for those with Crohn’s disease. Third, as shown in Table 2 in their study, 2 cases were retained in the stomach of the 17 retentions, actually cases retained in the stomach can be checked with the tracking system of the CE. In our department, for cases retained in the stomach, gastroscope is used to help pushing the CE into the duodenum if the CE does not enter the duodenum within 2 hours. Finally, we do agree with the authors that careful review of surgical history and imaging before CE may help reduce capsule retention. Nevertheless, capsule retention can also occur even when the CT was normal. Conventional CT often missed the significant strictures and were poor predictors of capsule retention, CTE, and magnetic resonance enterography improving distention of small bowel may be more effective in predicting capsule retention. In summary, until now, no accurate methods can avoid capsule retention absolutely. We believe that previous radiologic evaluation before CE, such as CTE and magnetic resonance enterography, may help predict capsule retention. Further large prospective study is needed to confirm the accuracy of radiologic evaluation predictive of capsule retention.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inactivation of Digestive Proteases and Degradation of Mucus: The Possible Key Factors That Determined the Different Effects on the Gut by Antibiotics. P-099 Impact of Inflammatory Bowel Disease on Sexual Function of Patients in a Mexican Population Damage of the Mucus Layer: The Possible Shared Critical Common Cause for Both Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). P-104 Association Between pANCA Status and Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Ulcerative Colitis: A Meta-analysis The Ileitis of Ulcerative Colitis. Why Is It Not Crohn's Disease?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1