科学核心学校学生STEM职业动机的纵向研究

Sein Shin, A. Rachmatullah, M. Ha, Jun-Ki Lee
{"title":"科学核心学校学生STEM职业动机的纵向研究","authors":"Sein Shin, A. Rachmatullah, M. Ha, Jun-Ki Lee","doi":"10.14697/JKASE.2016.36.6.0835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the present study is to analyze the trajectory of science core school students’ STEM career motivation and to examine the relationship between the trajectory patterns and students’ tracks. Longitudinal STEM career motivation data with seven constructs were collected from 256 students for five semesters and the data were analyzed by using group-based trajectory modelling analysis. In order to examine the relationship between trajectory pattern groups and the tracks, chi-square tests were conducted. Based on our findings, we found that students are likely to have similar trajectory patterns in STEM career education experience and in their perception towards STEM career value. In terms of parents’ support, academic self-efficacy and STEM career motivation aspects are divided into two distinctive trajectory groups (‘high’ and ‘low’ group), while two other variables, STEM career self-efficacy and STEM career interest, are divided into three trajectory groups (‘moderate declining’, ‘high declining’, ‘increasing’ group). Most of the trajectory groups are shown the pattern that the level of each constructs increase until their second academic year, then after that, the patterns started going down. Moreover, there are significant relationship between track and each trajectory groups. Science track and science-core track students have similar trajectory patterns. In contrast, humanities track students have different trajectory groups in some constructs. Based on these findings, we suggest that STEM career education environment should consider various patterns of students’ STEM career development.","PeriodicalId":107400,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Longitudinal Study of Science Core School Students' STEM Career Motivation\",\"authors\":\"Sein Shin, A. Rachmatullah, M. Ha, Jun-Ki Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.14697/JKASE.2016.36.6.0835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of the present study is to analyze the trajectory of science core school students’ STEM career motivation and to examine the relationship between the trajectory patterns and students’ tracks. Longitudinal STEM career motivation data with seven constructs were collected from 256 students for five semesters and the data were analyzed by using group-based trajectory modelling analysis. In order to examine the relationship between trajectory pattern groups and the tracks, chi-square tests were conducted. Based on our findings, we found that students are likely to have similar trajectory patterns in STEM career education experience and in their perception towards STEM career value. In terms of parents’ support, academic self-efficacy and STEM career motivation aspects are divided into two distinctive trajectory groups (‘high’ and ‘low’ group), while two other variables, STEM career self-efficacy and STEM career interest, are divided into three trajectory groups (‘moderate declining’, ‘high declining’, ‘increasing’ group). Most of the trajectory groups are shown the pattern that the level of each constructs increase until their second academic year, then after that, the patterns started going down. Moreover, there are significant relationship between track and each trajectory groups. Science track and science-core track students have similar trajectory patterns. In contrast, humanities track students have different trajectory groups in some constructs. Based on these findings, we suggest that STEM career education environment should consider various patterns of students’ STEM career development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":107400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2016.36.6.0835\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2016.36.6.0835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在分析科学核心学校学生STEM职业动机的轨迹,并探讨轨迹模式与学生轨迹之间的关系。采用基于群体的轨迹模型分析方法,对256名大学生5个学期的STEM职业动机数据进行了分析。为了检验轨迹模式组与轨迹之间的关系,我们进行了卡方检验。根据我们的研究结果,我们发现学生在STEM职业教育经历和对STEM职业价值的看法上可能有相似的轨迹模式。在父母支持方面,学术自我效能感和STEM职业动机方面被分为两个不同的轨迹组(“高”和“低”组),STEM职业自我效能感和STEM职业兴趣两个变量被分为三个轨迹组(“中度下降”、“高度下降”、“上升”组)。大多数轨迹组的模式是每个构念的水平都在上升,直到他们的第二学年,然后,模式开始下降。此外,轨迹与各轨迹组之间存在显著的相关关系。科学轨道和科学核心轨道学生的轨迹模式相似。人文学科学生在某些构念上存在不同的轨迹群体。基于这些发现,我们建议STEM职业教育环境应该考虑学生STEM职业发展的各种模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Longitudinal Study of Science Core School Students' STEM Career Motivation
The purpose of the present study is to analyze the trajectory of science core school students’ STEM career motivation and to examine the relationship between the trajectory patterns and students’ tracks. Longitudinal STEM career motivation data with seven constructs were collected from 256 students for five semesters and the data were analyzed by using group-based trajectory modelling analysis. In order to examine the relationship between trajectory pattern groups and the tracks, chi-square tests were conducted. Based on our findings, we found that students are likely to have similar trajectory patterns in STEM career education experience and in their perception towards STEM career value. In terms of parents’ support, academic self-efficacy and STEM career motivation aspects are divided into two distinctive trajectory groups (‘high’ and ‘low’ group), while two other variables, STEM career self-efficacy and STEM career interest, are divided into three trajectory groups (‘moderate declining’, ‘high declining’, ‘increasing’ group). Most of the trajectory groups are shown the pattern that the level of each constructs increase until their second academic year, then after that, the patterns started going down. Moreover, there are significant relationship between track and each trajectory groups. Science track and science-core track students have similar trajectory patterns. In contrast, humanities track students have different trajectory groups in some constructs. Based on these findings, we suggest that STEM career education environment should consider various patterns of students’ STEM career development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
2015 개정 과학과 교육과정의 적용에 대한 초·중학교 교사의 인식과 요구 STEAM 기반 학생 연구 활동 분석을 통한 과학 교육에 대한 시사점 고찰 한국, 미국, 영국, 싱가포르의 과학 교육과정 비교 - 에너지 개념을 중심으로 - A Case Study on Application of the NABI Program to Realize the 'Practice Centered Mechanism of Manifesting Character' Item Response Analysis of Energy as a Cross-Cutting Concept for Grades 3 to 9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1