越南小学英语学习游戏活动

Pham Hoai Huong Le
{"title":"越南小学英语学习游戏活动","authors":"Pham Hoai Huong Le","doi":"10.5746/LEIA/13/V4/I1/A6/LE","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the play activities that are used in primary English classes in a city in Vietnam. Video recording the classes and interviewing the teachers show that various play activities, for example, bingo, miming, hangman, and TPR (Total Physical Response) activities were employed in these classes. Through the play activities, students practiced vocabulary, simple grammatical structures, and language skills such as listening and speaking. In addition, the students learned to follow game rules, support team members, and lead when necessary. Based on the practical values of play activities, the paper provides suggestions on how to use specific play activities in primary English classes, the language skills / areas to be targeted at with play activities, and how to manage the play activities. The Importance of Play in Learning Play in learning at the primary level. The definitions of play vary, but the emphasis always includes the fun that play brings to young learners. Play is anything done in a playful manner, as play is a “communication style” (Beresin 1993, p. 252). Play includes learning games and games promoting physical play. In this sense, learning is a precondition for and an integrated part of children's play activities (Sorensen & Meyer, 2007). Play promotes learners' active involvement and engagement, both verbally and non-verbally, with materials, peers, and the learning environment (Shipley, 2008). The British Council (2007) pointed out that at primaryschool age, students do not realize of the importance of learning; therefore, teachers should know how to combine learning and playing in group and pair activities to create excitement. In other words, play motivates learners to learn (Cook, 1997; Shipley, 2008), even when learners become frustrated due to losing a competition. Play is also considered as experiential learning (Verenikina, Harris, & Lysaght, 2003); when children participate in play activities, they subconsciously self-reflect and develop abstract thinking as well as social communication skills. In play activities, children learn and have to abide by rules but also feel free to express their emotions. According to Bodrova and Leong (2001), play provides a unique context where children can develop the ability to self-regulate their behavior at the highest attainable level. Sociocultural theorists view play as a vital activity of the early childhood years (Vygotsky, 1978). For Vygotskians, play can be imaginary situations and activities with roles and rules. Language Education in Asia, 2013, 4(1), 76-87.http://dx.doi.org/10.5746/LEiA/13/V4/I1/A6/Le Language Education in Asia, Volume 4, Issue 1, 2013 Le Page 77 The former are usually explicit, but the latter are typically implicit. Children are expected to know the general rules and roles in play activities (Bodrova & Leong, 2001). Play in language learning. Play activities are described in different ways in language learning. They can be small-group discussions, games, and skits in which the creative and playful use of language is facilitated (Pomerantz & Bell, 2007). They can also use music, games, and TPR (Total Physical Response) activities, verbal play, vocabulary building, talking to oneself in the classroom, or even creating “crazy” sentences such as, “The octopus ate the giant purple banana” (Bacha, 2011, Play section, para. 3). There are various reasons to use play in language learning. Play provides a rich, complex environment for learning with both form-focused and meaning-focused activities (Cook, 1997). Play includes types of games which are beneficial in many ways both for learning and the emotions of learners (Gee, 2008). In Gee’s (2008) point of view, play promotes sharing knowledge, collaboration, and problem solving; players become the owners of their actions and language and can situate meanings of words from actions, images, interaction, and the participation of others. Discussing play in more detail, Cook (2000) has said that play in language learning is classified into two groups: patterned sound and pragmatic contextualized meaning. The first group contains verse, speech, and semantic meaning, while the second shows the interaction between interlocutors. Pomerantz and Bell (2007) argued that language play is necessary for language production in EFL classrooms. Instances of spontaneous, creative language play help learners practice various vocabulary and sentence structures. In addition, humorous moments in play provide opportunities for participants to use language, contributing to the growth of learners ’ communicative ability in general. Language play is fun and commonly marked overtly by laughter or other signs of enjoyment. In classrooms where play with language happens, class members develop a sense of community and construct a play frame around utterances or interactions (Sullivan, 2000). In this study, a play activity refers to the actions and language used in learning English by young learners. It could be each member in the class using words to make a sentence when it is his / her turn to do this in competition with another member, acting out a song, or calling out a word starting with a letter of the alphabet. In these play activities, students usually have fun learning simple words and grammar structures or practicing language skills. Primary English in Vietnam English at the primary level in Vietnam has been neglected for years, although English has gained popularity in this country since the Doi Moi (innovation) Policy in the 1980s. According to the Vietnam’s Ministry of Education and Training (2010), Vietnam has a high demand for teachers of English for primary schools (the ministry claims that by 2020 all Grade 3 students will have to study English). However, at present, only a few pedagogical junior colleges and universities in Vietnam offer courses to train English teachers at the primary level. As a result, Vietnam severely lacks primary English teachers (Minh, 2011; Tran & Tran, 2011). Nguyen (2011) revealed that some private schools in the larger cities in Vietnam have started to offer English courses for Grade 1 learners for as many as 12 periods per week; however, the practice of teaching and learning English at the primary level varies across the regions of the country.","PeriodicalId":263152,"journal":{"name":"Language Education in Asia","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Play Activities for Primary English Learners in Vietnam\",\"authors\":\"Pham Hoai Huong Le\",\"doi\":\"10.5746/LEIA/13/V4/I1/A6/LE\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article discusses the play activities that are used in primary English classes in a city in Vietnam. Video recording the classes and interviewing the teachers show that various play activities, for example, bingo, miming, hangman, and TPR (Total Physical Response) activities were employed in these classes. Through the play activities, students practiced vocabulary, simple grammatical structures, and language skills such as listening and speaking. In addition, the students learned to follow game rules, support team members, and lead when necessary. Based on the practical values of play activities, the paper provides suggestions on how to use specific play activities in primary English classes, the language skills / areas to be targeted at with play activities, and how to manage the play activities. The Importance of Play in Learning Play in learning at the primary level. The definitions of play vary, but the emphasis always includes the fun that play brings to young learners. Play is anything done in a playful manner, as play is a “communication style” (Beresin 1993, p. 252). Play includes learning games and games promoting physical play. In this sense, learning is a precondition for and an integrated part of children's play activities (Sorensen & Meyer, 2007). Play promotes learners' active involvement and engagement, both verbally and non-verbally, with materials, peers, and the learning environment (Shipley, 2008). The British Council (2007) pointed out that at primaryschool age, students do not realize of the importance of learning; therefore, teachers should know how to combine learning and playing in group and pair activities to create excitement. In other words, play motivates learners to learn (Cook, 1997; Shipley, 2008), even when learners become frustrated due to losing a competition. Play is also considered as experiential learning (Verenikina, Harris, & Lysaght, 2003); when children participate in play activities, they subconsciously self-reflect and develop abstract thinking as well as social communication skills. In play activities, children learn and have to abide by rules but also feel free to express their emotions. According to Bodrova and Leong (2001), play provides a unique context where children can develop the ability to self-regulate their behavior at the highest attainable level. Sociocultural theorists view play as a vital activity of the early childhood years (Vygotsky, 1978). For Vygotskians, play can be imaginary situations and activities with roles and rules. Language Education in Asia, 2013, 4(1), 76-87.http://dx.doi.org/10.5746/LEiA/13/V4/I1/A6/Le Language Education in Asia, Volume 4, Issue 1, 2013 Le Page 77 The former are usually explicit, but the latter are typically implicit. Children are expected to know the general rules and roles in play activities (Bodrova & Leong, 2001). Play in language learning. Play activities are described in different ways in language learning. They can be small-group discussions, games, and skits in which the creative and playful use of language is facilitated (Pomerantz & Bell, 2007). They can also use music, games, and TPR (Total Physical Response) activities, verbal play, vocabulary building, talking to oneself in the classroom, or even creating “crazy” sentences such as, “The octopus ate the giant purple banana” (Bacha, 2011, Play section, para. 3). There are various reasons to use play in language learning. Play provides a rich, complex environment for learning with both form-focused and meaning-focused activities (Cook, 1997). Play includes types of games which are beneficial in many ways both for learning and the emotions of learners (Gee, 2008). In Gee’s (2008) point of view, play promotes sharing knowledge, collaboration, and problem solving; players become the owners of their actions and language and can situate meanings of words from actions, images, interaction, and the participation of others. Discussing play in more detail, Cook (2000) has said that play in language learning is classified into two groups: patterned sound and pragmatic contextualized meaning. The first group contains verse, speech, and semantic meaning, while the second shows the interaction between interlocutors. Pomerantz and Bell (2007) argued that language play is necessary for language production in EFL classrooms. Instances of spontaneous, creative language play help learners practice various vocabulary and sentence structures. In addition, humorous moments in play provide opportunities for participants to use language, contributing to the growth of learners ’ communicative ability in general. Language play is fun and commonly marked overtly by laughter or other signs of enjoyment. In classrooms where play with language happens, class members develop a sense of community and construct a play frame around utterances or interactions (Sullivan, 2000). In this study, a play activity refers to the actions and language used in learning English by young learners. It could be each member in the class using words to make a sentence when it is his / her turn to do this in competition with another member, acting out a song, or calling out a word starting with a letter of the alphabet. In these play activities, students usually have fun learning simple words and grammar structures or practicing language skills. Primary English in Vietnam English at the primary level in Vietnam has been neglected for years, although English has gained popularity in this country since the Doi Moi (innovation) Policy in the 1980s. According to the Vietnam’s Ministry of Education and Training (2010), Vietnam has a high demand for teachers of English for primary schools (the ministry claims that by 2020 all Grade 3 students will have to study English). However, at present, only a few pedagogical junior colleges and universities in Vietnam offer courses to train English teachers at the primary level. As a result, Vietnam severely lacks primary English teachers (Minh, 2011; Tran & Tran, 2011). Nguyen (2011) revealed that some private schools in the larger cities in Vietnam have started to offer English courses for Grade 1 learners for as many as 12 periods per week; however, the practice of teaching and learning English at the primary level varies across the regions of the country.\",\"PeriodicalId\":263152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Education in Asia\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Education in Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5746/LEIA/13/V4/I1/A6/LE\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Education in Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5746/LEIA/13/V4/I1/A6/LE","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了越南某城市小学英语课堂中使用的游戏活动。通过对课堂的录像和对教师的采访,我们发现课堂上有各种各样的游戏活动,如宾果游戏、哑剧、绞刑、TPR (Total Physical Response)活动。通过游戏活动,学生们练习了词汇、简单的语法结构以及听、说等语言技能。此外,学生们学会了遵守游戏规则,支持团队成员,并在必要时领导。基于游戏活动的实用价值,本文就如何在小学英语课堂中运用特定的游戏活动、游戏活动应针对的语言技能/领域以及如何管理游戏活动提出了建议。游戏在学习中的重要性在小学阶段,游戏在学习中的作用。游戏的定义各不相同,但重点总是包括游戏给年轻学习者带来的乐趣。游戏是任何以好玩的方式完成的事情,因为游戏是一种“沟通风格”(Beresin 1993, p. 252)。游戏包括学习游戏和促进身体游戏的游戏。从这个意义上说,学习是儿童游戏活动的前提和组成部分(Sorensen & Meyer, 2007)。游戏促进学习者在语言和非语言方面对材料、同伴和学习环境的积极参与和投入(Shipley, 2008)。英国文化协会(2007)指出,在小学阶段,学生没有意识到学习的重要性;因此,教师应该知道如何在小组和结对活动中结合学习和游戏来创造兴奋。换句话说,游戏能够激励学习者去学习(Cook, 1997;Shipley, 2008),即使学习者因为输掉竞争而感到沮丧。游戏也被认为是一种体验式学习(Verenikina, Harris, & Lysaght, 2003);儿童在参与游戏活动时,会下意识地进行自我反思,培养抽象思维和社会沟通能力。在游戏活动中,孩子们学习,必须遵守规则,但也可以自由地表达自己的情绪。根据Bodrova和Leong(2001)的观点,游戏提供了一个独特的环境,在这个环境中,儿童可以在最高水平上发展自我调节行为的能力。社会文化理论家认为游戏是儿童早期的一项重要活动(Vygotsky, 1978)。对于维果茨基主义者来说,游戏可以是虚构的情境和有角色和规则的活动。亚洲语言教育,2013,4(1),76-87.http://dx.doi.org/10.5746/LEiA/13/V4/I1/A6/Le亚洲语言教育,第4卷,第1期,2013,Le Page 77前者通常是显性的,后者通常是隐性的。孩子们应该知道游戏活动中的一般规则和角色(Bodrova & Leong, 2001)。在语言学习中玩耍。游戏活动在语言学习中有不同的描述方式。它们可以是小组讨论、游戏和短剧,其中可以促进创造性和有趣的语言使用(Pomerantz & Bell, 2007)。他们还可以使用音乐、游戏、TPR (Total Physical Response)活动、语言游戏、词汇积累、在教室里自言自语,甚至创造“疯狂”的句子,如“章鱼吃了巨大的紫色香蕉”(Bacha, 2011, play部分,第6段)。在语言学习中使用游戏的原因有很多。游戏为学习提供了丰富而复杂的环境,其中既有形式导向型活动,也有意义导向型活动(Cook, 1997)。玩游戏包括在许多方面对学习和学习者的情感都有益的游戏类型。在Gee(2008)的观点中,游戏促进了知识共享、协作和问题解决;玩家成为自己行动和语言的主人,可以从行动、图像、互动和其他人的参与中定位词语的含义。Cook(2000)更详细地讨论了游戏,他说语言学习中的游戏分为两类:模式声音和语用语境化意义。第一组包含诗句、言语和语义,第二组显示对话者之间的互动。Pomerantz和Bell(2007)认为,在英语课堂中,语言游戏对于语言生产是必要的。自发的、创造性的语言游戏有助于学习者练习各种词汇和句子结构。此外,游戏中的幽默时刻为参与者提供了使用语言的机会,有助于学习者整体交际能力的增长。语言游戏很有趣,通常以笑声或其他享受的迹象为明显标志。在进行语言游戏的教室里,班级成员会形成一种社区意识,并围绕话语或互动构建一个游戏框架(Sullivan, 2000)。在本研究中,游戏活动是指青少年学习者在英语学习中使用的动作和语言。 它可以是班上的每个成员在轮到他/她和另一个成员比赛的时候用单词造句,表演一首歌,或者喊出字母表中以字母开头的单词。在这些游戏活动中,学生们通常很高兴地学习简单的单词和语法结构或练习语言技能。越南的初级英语多年来一直被忽视,尽管自20世纪80年代的创新政策以来,英语在这个国家得到了普及。根据越南教育培训部(2010年)的数据,越南对小学英语教师的需求很高(该部门声称,到2020年,所有三年级学生都必须学习英语)。然而,目前,越南只有少数师范大专院校提供初级英语教师培训课程。因此,越南严重缺乏小学英语教师(Minh, 2011;Tran & Tran, 2011)。Nguyen(2011)透露,越南大城市的一些私立学校已经开始为一年级学生提供每周多达12节的英语课程;然而,在小学阶段教英语和学英语的做法在全国各地各不相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Play Activities for Primary English Learners in Vietnam
This article discusses the play activities that are used in primary English classes in a city in Vietnam. Video recording the classes and interviewing the teachers show that various play activities, for example, bingo, miming, hangman, and TPR (Total Physical Response) activities were employed in these classes. Through the play activities, students practiced vocabulary, simple grammatical structures, and language skills such as listening and speaking. In addition, the students learned to follow game rules, support team members, and lead when necessary. Based on the practical values of play activities, the paper provides suggestions on how to use specific play activities in primary English classes, the language skills / areas to be targeted at with play activities, and how to manage the play activities. The Importance of Play in Learning Play in learning at the primary level. The definitions of play vary, but the emphasis always includes the fun that play brings to young learners. Play is anything done in a playful manner, as play is a “communication style” (Beresin 1993, p. 252). Play includes learning games and games promoting physical play. In this sense, learning is a precondition for and an integrated part of children's play activities (Sorensen & Meyer, 2007). Play promotes learners' active involvement and engagement, both verbally and non-verbally, with materials, peers, and the learning environment (Shipley, 2008). The British Council (2007) pointed out that at primaryschool age, students do not realize of the importance of learning; therefore, teachers should know how to combine learning and playing in group and pair activities to create excitement. In other words, play motivates learners to learn (Cook, 1997; Shipley, 2008), even when learners become frustrated due to losing a competition. Play is also considered as experiential learning (Verenikina, Harris, & Lysaght, 2003); when children participate in play activities, they subconsciously self-reflect and develop abstract thinking as well as social communication skills. In play activities, children learn and have to abide by rules but also feel free to express their emotions. According to Bodrova and Leong (2001), play provides a unique context where children can develop the ability to self-regulate their behavior at the highest attainable level. Sociocultural theorists view play as a vital activity of the early childhood years (Vygotsky, 1978). For Vygotskians, play can be imaginary situations and activities with roles and rules. Language Education in Asia, 2013, 4(1), 76-87.http://dx.doi.org/10.5746/LEiA/13/V4/I1/A6/Le Language Education in Asia, Volume 4, Issue 1, 2013 Le Page 77 The former are usually explicit, but the latter are typically implicit. Children are expected to know the general rules and roles in play activities (Bodrova & Leong, 2001). Play in language learning. Play activities are described in different ways in language learning. They can be small-group discussions, games, and skits in which the creative and playful use of language is facilitated (Pomerantz & Bell, 2007). They can also use music, games, and TPR (Total Physical Response) activities, verbal play, vocabulary building, talking to oneself in the classroom, or even creating “crazy” sentences such as, “The octopus ate the giant purple banana” (Bacha, 2011, Play section, para. 3). There are various reasons to use play in language learning. Play provides a rich, complex environment for learning with both form-focused and meaning-focused activities (Cook, 1997). Play includes types of games which are beneficial in many ways both for learning and the emotions of learners (Gee, 2008). In Gee’s (2008) point of view, play promotes sharing knowledge, collaboration, and problem solving; players become the owners of their actions and language and can situate meanings of words from actions, images, interaction, and the participation of others. Discussing play in more detail, Cook (2000) has said that play in language learning is classified into two groups: patterned sound and pragmatic contextualized meaning. The first group contains verse, speech, and semantic meaning, while the second shows the interaction between interlocutors. Pomerantz and Bell (2007) argued that language play is necessary for language production in EFL classrooms. Instances of spontaneous, creative language play help learners practice various vocabulary and sentence structures. In addition, humorous moments in play provide opportunities for participants to use language, contributing to the growth of learners ’ communicative ability in general. Language play is fun and commonly marked overtly by laughter or other signs of enjoyment. In classrooms where play with language happens, class members develop a sense of community and construct a play frame around utterances or interactions (Sullivan, 2000). In this study, a play activity refers to the actions and language used in learning English by young learners. It could be each member in the class using words to make a sentence when it is his / her turn to do this in competition with another member, acting out a song, or calling out a word starting with a letter of the alphabet. In these play activities, students usually have fun learning simple words and grammar structures or practicing language skills. Primary English in Vietnam English at the primary level in Vietnam has been neglected for years, although English has gained popularity in this country since the Doi Moi (innovation) Policy in the 1980s. According to the Vietnam’s Ministry of Education and Training (2010), Vietnam has a high demand for teachers of English for primary schools (the ministry claims that by 2020 all Grade 3 students will have to study English). However, at present, only a few pedagogical junior colleges and universities in Vietnam offer courses to train English teachers at the primary level. As a result, Vietnam severely lacks primary English teachers (Minh, 2011; Tran & Tran, 2011). Nguyen (2011) revealed that some private schools in the larger cities in Vietnam have started to offer English courses for Grade 1 learners for as many as 12 periods per week; however, the practice of teaching and learning English at the primary level varies across the regions of the country.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Teaching Writing Using Genre-Based Approach: A Study at a Vietnamese University Investigating the Influence of Webinar Participation on Professional Development of English Language Teachers in Rural Vietnam Effective Use of Peer-feedback in Developing Academic Writing Skills of Undergraduate Students Paraphrasing in Academic Writing: a Case Study of Vietnamese Learners of English The Emergence of Cultural Learning Shift in English Language Pedagogy and Teacher Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1