{"title":"议题冲突:网撒得太广?","authors":"Francisco González de Cossío","doi":"10.54648/bcdr2021007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The possibility that arbitrators entrusted with resolving investment disputes may have so-called ‘issue-conflicts’ has provoked some angry criticism, contentious debate, awardannulments, and fledgling prohibitions. The discussion and current thinking appear to overlook the consequences stemming from adopting general prohibitions which are not justified in many cases. This essay calls for calm, sober, analysis to frame the matter objectively and to ensure that the measures adopted are not overly and unnecessarily prohibitive: a net cast too wide.","PeriodicalId":166341,"journal":{"name":"BCDR International Arbitration Review","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Issue Conflicts: A Net Cast Too Wide?\",\"authors\":\"Francisco González de Cossío\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/bcdr2021007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The possibility that arbitrators entrusted with resolving investment disputes may have so-called ‘issue-conflicts’ has provoked some angry criticism, contentious debate, awardannulments, and fledgling prohibitions. The discussion and current thinking appear to overlook the consequences stemming from adopting general prohibitions which are not justified in many cases. This essay calls for calm, sober, analysis to frame the matter objectively and to ensure that the measures adopted are not overly and unnecessarily prohibitive: a net cast too wide.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BCDR International Arbitration Review\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BCDR International Arbitration Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/bcdr2021007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BCDR International Arbitration Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/bcdr2021007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The possibility that arbitrators entrusted with resolving investment disputes may have so-called ‘issue-conflicts’ has provoked some angry criticism, contentious debate, awardannulments, and fledgling prohibitions. The discussion and current thinking appear to overlook the consequences stemming from adopting general prohibitions which are not justified in many cases. This essay calls for calm, sober, analysis to frame the matter objectively and to ensure that the measures adopted are not overly and unnecessarily prohibitive: a net cast too wide.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
