{"title":"赤池信息标准","authors":"P. Larrañaga, C. Bielza","doi":"10.1002/9780471650126.DOB0802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Akaike Information Criterion is one of a range of ways of choosing between different types of models that seek an appropriate trade-off between goodness of fit and model complexity. The more complicated a model is the better generally will be its apparent goodness of fit, if the parameters are selected to optimise goodness of fit, but this does not necessarily make it a ‘better’ model overall for identifying how new data might behave.","PeriodicalId":103269,"journal":{"name":"Dictionary of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"162","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Akaike Information Criterion\",\"authors\":\"P. Larrañaga, C. Bielza\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/9780471650126.DOB0802\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Akaike Information Criterion is one of a range of ways of choosing between different types of models that seek an appropriate trade-off between goodness of fit and model complexity. The more complicated a model is the better generally will be its apparent goodness of fit, if the parameters are selected to optimise goodness of fit, but this does not necessarily make it a ‘better’ model overall for identifying how new data might behave.\",\"PeriodicalId\":103269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dictionary of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"162\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dictionary of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/9780471650126.DOB0802\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dictionary of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9780471650126.DOB0802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Akaike Information Criterion is one of a range of ways of choosing between different types of models that seek an appropriate trade-off between goodness of fit and model complexity. The more complicated a model is the better generally will be its apparent goodness of fit, if the parameters are selected to optimise goodness of fit, but this does not necessarily make it a ‘better’ model overall for identifying how new data might behave.