旁观者干预以防止激进化

Loo Seng Neo, J. Pang, Jeffery Chin
{"title":"旁观者干预以防止激进化","authors":"Loo Seng Neo, J. Pang, Jeffery Chin","doi":"10.1142/9789813275447_0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The literature is replete with striking cases of individuals who have witnessed signs of radicalisation to violence but failed to report or intervene. A review of literature reveals cases of such bystander behaviour such as the 2009 Fort Hood attack, where Nidal Hassan’s colleagues noticed a drastic change in his worldview (McKinley & Dao, 2009), and the 2016 Orlando Pulse nightclub shooting where the wife of Omar Mateen knew about her husband’s intention to commit the attack (Tacopino, 2018). In both cases, reports suggest that the individuals in question failed to intervene. The drastic consequences and the nature of the bystanders’ non-reporting behaviours have continued to perplex authorities and raised new","PeriodicalId":422975,"journal":{"name":"Learning from Violent Extremist Attacks","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bystander Intervention to Prevent Radicalisation\",\"authors\":\"Loo Seng Neo, J. Pang, Jeffery Chin\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/9789813275447_0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The literature is replete with striking cases of individuals who have witnessed signs of radicalisation to violence but failed to report or intervene. A review of literature reveals cases of such bystander behaviour such as the 2009 Fort Hood attack, where Nidal Hassan’s colleagues noticed a drastic change in his worldview (McKinley & Dao, 2009), and the 2016 Orlando Pulse nightclub shooting where the wife of Omar Mateen knew about her husband’s intention to commit the attack (Tacopino, 2018). In both cases, reports suggest that the individuals in question failed to intervene. The drastic consequences and the nature of the bystanders’ non-reporting behaviours have continued to perplex authorities and raised new\",\"PeriodicalId\":422975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning from Violent Extremist Attacks\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning from Violent Extremist Attacks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813275447_0010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning from Violent Extremist Attacks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813275447_0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

文献中充斥着一些令人震惊的案例,有些人目睹了暴力激进化的迹象,但却没有报告或干预。对文献的回顾揭示了这种旁观者行为的案例,如2009年胡德堡袭击事件,Nidal Hassan的同事注意到他的世界观发生了巨大变化(McKinley & Dao, 2009),以及2016年奥兰多脉冲夜总会枪击案,奥马尔·马丁的妻子知道她丈夫的意图进行袭击(Tacopino, 2018)。在这两起案件中,报告都表明相关个人未能进行干预。严重的后果和旁观者不报告行为的性质继续困扰着当局,并引发了新的问题
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bystander Intervention to Prevent Radicalisation
The literature is replete with striking cases of individuals who have witnessed signs of radicalisation to violence but failed to report or intervene. A review of literature reveals cases of such bystander behaviour such as the 2009 Fort Hood attack, where Nidal Hassan’s colleagues noticed a drastic change in his worldview (McKinley & Dao, 2009), and the 2016 Orlando Pulse nightclub shooting where the wife of Omar Mateen knew about her husband’s intention to commit the attack (Tacopino, 2018). In both cases, reports suggest that the individuals in question failed to intervene. The drastic consequences and the nature of the bystanders’ non-reporting behaviours have continued to perplex authorities and raised new
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Responding to a Violent Extremist Attack: Insights from the 2016 Orlando Shooting Incident Preparing for the Day After Terror: Five Things to Do to Build National Resilience The 4M Strategy of Combating Violent Extremism: An Analysis Insights for Dealing with At-Risk Population Engaging Youths in Counter-Violent Extremism (CVE) Initiatives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1