采样+ DMR:实用且低开销的永久故障检测

Shuou Nomura, Matthew D. Sinclair, C. Ho, Venkatraman Govindaraju, M. Kruijf, K. Sankaralingam
{"title":"采样+ DMR:实用且低开销的永久故障检测","authors":"Shuou Nomura, Matthew D. Sinclair, C. Ho, Venkatraman Govindaraju, M. Kruijf, K. Sankaralingam","doi":"10.1145/2000064.2000089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With technology scaling, manufacture-time and in-field permanent faults are becoming a fundamental problem. Multi-core architectures with spares can tolerate them by detecting and isolating faulty cores, but the required fault detection coverage becomes effectively 100% as the number of permanent faults increases. Dual-modular redundancy(DMR) can provide 100% coverage without assuming device-level fault models, but its overhead is excessive. In this paper, we explore a simple and low-overhead mechanism we call Sampling-DMR: run in DMR mode for a small percentage (1% of the time for example) of each periodic execution window (5 million cycles for example). Although Sampling-DMR can leave some errors undetected, we argue the permanent fault coverage is 100% because it can detect all faults eventually. SamplingDMR thus introduces a system paradigm of restricting all permanent faults' effects to small finite windows of error occurrence. We prove an ultimate upper bound exists on total missed errors and develop a probabilistic model to analyze the distribution of the number of undetected errors and detection latency. The model is validated using full gate-level fault injection experiments for an actual processor running full application software. Sampling-DMR outperforms conventional techniques in terms of fault coverage, sustains similar detection latency guarantees, and limits energy and performance overheads to less than 2%.","PeriodicalId":340732,"journal":{"name":"2011 38th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA)","volume":"239 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"53","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sampling + DMR: Practical and low-overhead permanent fault detection\",\"authors\":\"Shuou Nomura, Matthew D. Sinclair, C. Ho, Venkatraman Govindaraju, M. Kruijf, K. Sankaralingam\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2000064.2000089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With technology scaling, manufacture-time and in-field permanent faults are becoming a fundamental problem. Multi-core architectures with spares can tolerate them by detecting and isolating faulty cores, but the required fault detection coverage becomes effectively 100% as the number of permanent faults increases. Dual-modular redundancy(DMR) can provide 100% coverage without assuming device-level fault models, but its overhead is excessive. In this paper, we explore a simple and low-overhead mechanism we call Sampling-DMR: run in DMR mode for a small percentage (1% of the time for example) of each periodic execution window (5 million cycles for example). Although Sampling-DMR can leave some errors undetected, we argue the permanent fault coverage is 100% because it can detect all faults eventually. SamplingDMR thus introduces a system paradigm of restricting all permanent faults' effects to small finite windows of error occurrence. We prove an ultimate upper bound exists on total missed errors and develop a probabilistic model to analyze the distribution of the number of undetected errors and detection latency. The model is validated using full gate-level fault injection experiments for an actual processor running full application software. Sampling-DMR outperforms conventional techniques in terms of fault coverage, sustains similar detection latency guarantees, and limits energy and performance overheads to less than 2%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 38th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA)\",\"volume\":\"239 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"53\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 38th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2000064.2000089\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 38th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2000064.2000089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

摘要

随着技术的规模化,制造时间和现场永久故障已成为一个基本问题。带有备件的多核架构可以通过检测和隔离故障核来容忍它们,但随着永久故障数量的增加,所需的故障检测覆盖率实际上会达到100%。双模块冗余(DMR)可以在不假设设备级故障模型的情况下提供100%的覆盖,但其开销过大。在本文中,我们探索了一种简单且低开销的机制,我们称之为采样-DMR:在每个周期执行窗口(例如500万个周期)中以DMR模式运行一小部分时间(例如1%的时间)。尽管采样- dmr可能会留下一些未检测到的错误,但我们认为永久故障覆盖率为100%,因为它最终可以检测到所有故障。因此,采样dmr引入了一种系统范例,将所有永久故障的影响限制在错误发生的小有限窗口内。我们证明了总遗漏错误存在一个最终上界,并建立了一个概率模型来分析未检测错误数量和检测延迟的分布。通过运行完整应用软件的实际处理器的全门级故障注入实验,对模型进行了验证。采样- dmr在故障覆盖方面优于传统技术,保持类似的检测延迟保证,并将能量和性能开销限制在2%以下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sampling + DMR: Practical and low-overhead permanent fault detection
With technology scaling, manufacture-time and in-field permanent faults are becoming a fundamental problem. Multi-core architectures with spares can tolerate them by detecting and isolating faulty cores, but the required fault detection coverage becomes effectively 100% as the number of permanent faults increases. Dual-modular redundancy(DMR) can provide 100% coverage without assuming device-level fault models, but its overhead is excessive. In this paper, we explore a simple and low-overhead mechanism we call Sampling-DMR: run in DMR mode for a small percentage (1% of the time for example) of each periodic execution window (5 million cycles for example). Although Sampling-DMR can leave some errors undetected, we argue the permanent fault coverage is 100% because it can detect all faults eventually. SamplingDMR thus introduces a system paradigm of restricting all permanent faults' effects to small finite windows of error occurrence. We prove an ultimate upper bound exists on total missed errors and develop a probabilistic model to analyze the distribution of the number of undetected errors and detection latency. The model is validated using full gate-level fault injection experiments for an actual processor running full application software. Sampling-DMR outperforms conventional techniques in terms of fault coverage, sustains similar detection latency guarantees, and limits energy and performance overheads to less than 2%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Crafting a usable microkernel, processor, and I/O system with strict and provable information flow security Exploring the tradeoffs between programmability and efficiency in data-parallel accelerators Scalable power control for many-core architectures running multi-threaded applications Virtualizing performance asymmetric multi-core systems DBAR: An efficient routing algorithm to support multiple concurrent applications in networks-on-chip
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1