利用主成分分析和帕累托最优选择柔性制造系统

K. Rezaie, A. Haeri
{"title":"利用主成分分析和帕累托最优选择柔性制造系统","authors":"K. Rezaie, A. Haeri","doi":"10.1109/SYSCON.2011.5929062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Flexible manufacturing systems (FMS) attract more attention in recent years. Design and establishing of a FMS need much investment. So it is necessary to make best decision for selection of a FMS alternative. In this paper an approach for selecting a FMS alternative on the basis of the performance criteria is presented. Six input and output factors are used for FMS selection. Initially the approach use Principle Component Analysis (PCA) for decreasing number of criteria. After performing PCA two criteria are generated instead of initial six criteria. After that Pareto optimality and Pareto front concepts are used for rank FMS alternatives on the basis of the two new criteria. The proposed approach is performed on a data set that contains specification of 12 FMS alternatives. At the end suggestions for future research is mentioned.","PeriodicalId":109868,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE International Systems Conference","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using PCA and Pareto optimality to select flexible manufacturing systems\",\"authors\":\"K. Rezaie, A. Haeri\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SYSCON.2011.5929062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Flexible manufacturing systems (FMS) attract more attention in recent years. Design and establishing of a FMS need much investment. So it is necessary to make best decision for selection of a FMS alternative. In this paper an approach for selecting a FMS alternative on the basis of the performance criteria is presented. Six input and output factors are used for FMS selection. Initially the approach use Principle Component Analysis (PCA) for decreasing number of criteria. After performing PCA two criteria are generated instead of initial six criteria. After that Pareto optimality and Pareto front concepts are used for rank FMS alternatives on the basis of the two new criteria. The proposed approach is performed on a data set that contains specification of 12 FMS alternatives. At the end suggestions for future research is mentioned.\",\"PeriodicalId\":109868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE International Systems Conference\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE International Systems Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSCON.2011.5929062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE International Systems Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSCON.2011.5929062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

柔性制造系统(FMS)近年来受到越来越多的关注。FMS的设计和建立需要大量的投资。因此,有必要对FMS方案的选择进行最佳决策。本文提出了一种基于性能标准的FMS备选方案的选择方法。6个输入和输出因素用于FMS选择。最初,该方法使用主成分分析(PCA)来减少标准的数量。执行PCA后,生成两个标准,而不是最初的六个标准。在此基础上,利用Pareto最优性和Pareto前沿概念对FMS备选方案进行排序。提出的方法在包含12个FMS备选方案规范的数据集上执行。最后对今后的研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using PCA and Pareto optimality to select flexible manufacturing systems
Flexible manufacturing systems (FMS) attract more attention in recent years. Design and establishing of a FMS need much investment. So it is necessary to make best decision for selection of a FMS alternative. In this paper an approach for selecting a FMS alternative on the basis of the performance criteria is presented. Six input and output factors are used for FMS selection. Initially the approach use Principle Component Analysis (PCA) for decreasing number of criteria. After performing PCA two criteria are generated instead of initial six criteria. After that Pareto optimality and Pareto front concepts are used for rank FMS alternatives on the basis of the two new criteria. The proposed approach is performed on a data set that contains specification of 12 FMS alternatives. At the end suggestions for future research is mentioned.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Developing a business case for Systems Engineering A systemic approach to managing risks of SoS Need for a framework for the assessment, evaluation and measurement of System Maturity, System Readiness and Capability Readiness A Petri Net-T3SD policy driven method for IT infrastructure selection in smart grid Enterprise governance and boundary decisions: The case of wireless technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1