{"title":"哈利·伯利的隐身与成名:回顾与展望","authors":"Samuel A. Floyd","doi":"10.2307/4145490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"April 2, 2003, saw the opening of a three-day conference, The Heritage and Legacy of Harry T. Burleigh (1866-1949), designed to address and celebrate the contributions of this singer, composer, vocal coach, pianist, teacher, editor, and producer. (1) The presenters explored issues ranging from who influenced Burleigh's career to whom he influenced; from his musical prowess to his work as a composer; from his arranging to his singing; from his songs to his choral works; from his spirituals to his popular and concert music. This occasion was the first to address comprehensively so many aspects of this individual's career and to provide interpretations that reach beneath the surface of previous writings to support his status as a key figure in the history of American music; for over the decades, discussions of his contributions to American music have been virtually absent in the tomes that document and extol that history. There are acceptable reasons for this silence, including the fact that until recently there have existed serious gaps in our knowledge about African-American music and musicians and a dearth of the kind of information that would reveal Burleigh as even semisignificant in the history of American music. In fact, in the large majority of cases, Burleigh's name does not appear unless Antonin Dvorak's does, not even in most black-oriented, black-authored, and black-produced publications. When his name is mentioned without Dvorak's, the context in which it appears carries the implication that Burleigh must have been a great singer since he was a featured soloist at a white church--St. George's Episcopal Church in New York--for fifty years, from 1894 to 1946. (2) Not even in my edited Black Music in the Harlem Renaissance (Floyd 1990) was Burleigh given more than a modicum of space, scattered throughout the volume. In order to place my observations in context, I will divert for a moment. The late musicologist Eileen Southern has told of colleagues at NYU questioning her decision to write a book about black music, one asking, \"What is there to learn about black music? There's nothing there--just jazz and spirituals. How could you possibly find enough material to make a course?\" (Wright 1992, 6). Well, she certainly proved his assumption to be wrong, producing a massive musicological tome about black music and black music making that ranges chronologically from pre-nineteenth-century American slave music to contemporary European-derived and American-based concert music, The Music of Black Americans. Since that landmark work first appeared, in 1971, an abundance of information has been revealed in scholarly journals, including her own trailblazing journal The Black Perspective in Music, Jon Michael Spencer's Journal of Black Sacred Music, and my own Black Music Research Journal, and in research tools and monographs on black music. A second edition of Southern's book was published in 1983, and a third in 1997. Each new edition contained much more information than in its previous incarnation and reflected an enlarged perspective, advanced by Southern's observation and study of developments that had taken place in the intervening years. Nevertheless, in the subsequent editions Burleigh remained underexposed, receiving only seven passing mentions in 1983 and seven in 1997; nor is he given much space in the second edition of Southern's edited Readings in Black American Music (1983), in which the authors of the book's essays gave him but five passing mentions. In The Power of Black Music (Floyd 1995), my treatment of him was not much better, for while I identified him there as a \"highly significant figure,\" my four passing mentions are now an embarrassment. A powerful exception to such omission is Reid Badger's biography of James Reese Europe, A Life in Ragtime (1995), which gives significant attention to Burleigh. All in all, however, while progress in the recognition of black music and musicians has been steadily consistent, Burleigh has been virtually disregarded. …","PeriodicalId":354930,"journal":{"name":"Black Music Research Journal","volume":"444 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Invisibility and Fame of Harry T. Burleigh: Retrospect and Prospect\",\"authors\":\"Samuel A. Floyd\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/4145490\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"April 2, 2003, saw the opening of a three-day conference, The Heritage and Legacy of Harry T. Burleigh (1866-1949), designed to address and celebrate the contributions of this singer, composer, vocal coach, pianist, teacher, editor, and producer. (1) The presenters explored issues ranging from who influenced Burleigh's career to whom he influenced; from his musical prowess to his work as a composer; from his arranging to his singing; from his songs to his choral works; from his spirituals to his popular and concert music. This occasion was the first to address comprehensively so many aspects of this individual's career and to provide interpretations that reach beneath the surface of previous writings to support his status as a key figure in the history of American music; for over the decades, discussions of his contributions to American music have been virtually absent in the tomes that document and extol that history. There are acceptable reasons for this silence, including the fact that until recently there have existed serious gaps in our knowledge about African-American music and musicians and a dearth of the kind of information that would reveal Burleigh as even semisignificant in the history of American music. In fact, in the large majority of cases, Burleigh's name does not appear unless Antonin Dvorak's does, not even in most black-oriented, black-authored, and black-produced publications. When his name is mentioned without Dvorak's, the context in which it appears carries the implication that Burleigh must have been a great singer since he was a featured soloist at a white church--St. George's Episcopal Church in New York--for fifty years, from 1894 to 1946. (2) Not even in my edited Black Music in the Harlem Renaissance (Floyd 1990) was Burleigh given more than a modicum of space, scattered throughout the volume. In order to place my observations in context, I will divert for a moment. The late musicologist Eileen Southern has told of colleagues at NYU questioning her decision to write a book about black music, one asking, \\\"What is there to learn about black music? There's nothing there--just jazz and spirituals. How could you possibly find enough material to make a course?\\\" (Wright 1992, 6). Well, she certainly proved his assumption to be wrong, producing a massive musicological tome about black music and black music making that ranges chronologically from pre-nineteenth-century American slave music to contemporary European-derived and American-based concert music, The Music of Black Americans. Since that landmark work first appeared, in 1971, an abundance of information has been revealed in scholarly journals, including her own trailblazing journal The Black Perspective in Music, Jon Michael Spencer's Journal of Black Sacred Music, and my own Black Music Research Journal, and in research tools and monographs on black music. A second edition of Southern's book was published in 1983, and a third in 1997. Each new edition contained much more information than in its previous incarnation and reflected an enlarged perspective, advanced by Southern's observation and study of developments that had taken place in the intervening years. Nevertheless, in the subsequent editions Burleigh remained underexposed, receiving only seven passing mentions in 1983 and seven in 1997; nor is he given much space in the second edition of Southern's edited Readings in Black American Music (1983), in which the authors of the book's essays gave him but five passing mentions. In The Power of Black Music (Floyd 1995), my treatment of him was not much better, for while I identified him there as a \\\"highly significant figure,\\\" my four passing mentions are now an embarrassment. A powerful exception to such omission is Reid Badger's biography of James Reese Europe, A Life in Ragtime (1995), which gives significant attention to Burleigh. All in all, however, while progress in the recognition of black music and musicians has been steadily consistent, Burleigh has been virtually disregarded. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":354930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Black Music Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"444 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Black Music Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/4145490\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Black Music Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/4145490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
摘要
2003年4月2日,为期三天的会议开幕,主题是哈利·t·伯利(1866-1949)的遗产和遗产,旨在讨论和庆祝这位歌手、作曲家、声乐教练、钢琴家、教师、编辑和制作人的贡献。(1)主持人探讨了从谁影响了伯利的职业生涯到他影响了谁的问题;从他的音乐才能到他作为作曲家的工作;从他的编排到他的歌唱;从他的歌曲到他的合唱作品;从他的灵歌到流行音乐和音乐会音乐。这是第一次全面探讨这个人的职业生涯的许多方面,并提供深入到以前的作品表面下的解释,以支持他作为美国音乐史上关键人物的地位;几十年来,关于他对美国音乐的贡献的讨论,在记录和颂扬这段历史的大部头著作中几乎是缺失的。这种沉默有一些可以接受的原因,包括直到最近我们对非裔美国人音乐和音乐家的了解还存在严重的差距,以及缺乏能够揭示伯利在美国音乐史上甚至是半重要的信息。事实上,在大多数情况下,伯利的名字不会出现,除非安东宁·德沃夏克的名字出现,甚至在大多数面向黑人、黑人作者和黑人出版的出版物中也不会出现。当伯利的名字在没有德沃夏克的情况下被提及时,它出现的背景暗示着伯利一定是一个伟大的歌手,因为他是一个白人教堂的独奏家。乔治圣公会教堂——从1894年到1946年的50年里。(2)即使在我编辑过的《哈莱姆文艺复兴时期的黑人音乐》(弗洛伊德1990)中,伯利的作品也只占了很少的篇幅,分散在整本书中。为了把我的观察放在上下文中,我要转移一下话题。已故的音乐学家艾琳·索瑟恩(Eileen Southern)曾说,纽约大学的同事质疑她写一本关于黑人音乐的书的决定,其中一位问道:“关于黑人音乐,我们能学到什么?”什么都没有,只有爵士乐和灵歌。你怎么可能找到足够的材料来开一门课呢?”(Wright 1992,6)嗯,她当然证明了他的假设是错误的,她制作了一本关于黑人音乐和黑人音乐制作的大型音乐学巨著,按时间顺序从19世纪前的美国奴隶音乐到当代源自欧洲和美国的音乐会音乐,《美国黑人音乐》。自从1971年这一具有里程碑意义的作品首次出现以来,学术期刊上已经披露了大量的信息,包括她自己的开创性期刊《音乐中的黑人视角》、乔恩·迈克尔·斯宾塞的《黑人神圣音乐期刊》和我自己的《黑人音乐研究期刊》,以及关于黑人音乐的研究工具和专著。萨南的书于1983年出版了第二版,1997年出版了第三版。每一个新版本都比之前的版本包含了更多的信息,反映了一个扩大的视角,这是Southern对其间几年发生的事态发展的观察和研究所带来的。然而,在随后的版本中,伯利的曝光仍然不足,1983年和1997年分别只有7次和7次被提及;在Southern编辑的《美国黑人音乐读本》(1983)的第二版中,他也没有得到太多的篇幅,在这本书的随笔中,作者们只提到了他五次。在《黑人音乐的力量》(The Power of Black Music, Floyd 1995)一书中,我对他的描述也好不到哪里去,因为虽然我在书中把他视为一个“非常重要的人物”,但我四次偶然提到他,现在却让人感到尴尬。里德·巴杰为詹姆斯·里斯·欧斯写的传记《拉格泰姆生活》(1995)是一个强有力的例外,该书对伯利给予了极大的关注。然而,总而言之,尽管对黑人音乐和音乐家的认可一直在稳步推进,但伯利实际上一直被忽视。…
The Invisibility and Fame of Harry T. Burleigh: Retrospect and Prospect
April 2, 2003, saw the opening of a three-day conference, The Heritage and Legacy of Harry T. Burleigh (1866-1949), designed to address and celebrate the contributions of this singer, composer, vocal coach, pianist, teacher, editor, and producer. (1) The presenters explored issues ranging from who influenced Burleigh's career to whom he influenced; from his musical prowess to his work as a composer; from his arranging to his singing; from his songs to his choral works; from his spirituals to his popular and concert music. This occasion was the first to address comprehensively so many aspects of this individual's career and to provide interpretations that reach beneath the surface of previous writings to support his status as a key figure in the history of American music; for over the decades, discussions of his contributions to American music have been virtually absent in the tomes that document and extol that history. There are acceptable reasons for this silence, including the fact that until recently there have existed serious gaps in our knowledge about African-American music and musicians and a dearth of the kind of information that would reveal Burleigh as even semisignificant in the history of American music. In fact, in the large majority of cases, Burleigh's name does not appear unless Antonin Dvorak's does, not even in most black-oriented, black-authored, and black-produced publications. When his name is mentioned without Dvorak's, the context in which it appears carries the implication that Burleigh must have been a great singer since he was a featured soloist at a white church--St. George's Episcopal Church in New York--for fifty years, from 1894 to 1946. (2) Not even in my edited Black Music in the Harlem Renaissance (Floyd 1990) was Burleigh given more than a modicum of space, scattered throughout the volume. In order to place my observations in context, I will divert for a moment. The late musicologist Eileen Southern has told of colleagues at NYU questioning her decision to write a book about black music, one asking, "What is there to learn about black music? There's nothing there--just jazz and spirituals. How could you possibly find enough material to make a course?" (Wright 1992, 6). Well, she certainly proved his assumption to be wrong, producing a massive musicological tome about black music and black music making that ranges chronologically from pre-nineteenth-century American slave music to contemporary European-derived and American-based concert music, The Music of Black Americans. Since that landmark work first appeared, in 1971, an abundance of information has been revealed in scholarly journals, including her own trailblazing journal The Black Perspective in Music, Jon Michael Spencer's Journal of Black Sacred Music, and my own Black Music Research Journal, and in research tools and monographs on black music. A second edition of Southern's book was published in 1983, and a third in 1997. Each new edition contained much more information than in its previous incarnation and reflected an enlarged perspective, advanced by Southern's observation and study of developments that had taken place in the intervening years. Nevertheless, in the subsequent editions Burleigh remained underexposed, receiving only seven passing mentions in 1983 and seven in 1997; nor is he given much space in the second edition of Southern's edited Readings in Black American Music (1983), in which the authors of the book's essays gave him but five passing mentions. In The Power of Black Music (Floyd 1995), my treatment of him was not much better, for while I identified him there as a "highly significant figure," my four passing mentions are now an embarrassment. A powerful exception to such omission is Reid Badger's biography of James Reese Europe, A Life in Ragtime (1995), which gives significant attention to Burleigh. All in all, however, while progress in the recognition of black music and musicians has been steadily consistent, Burleigh has been virtually disregarded. …