护理路径:从临床路径到护理创新

M. Panella, K. Vanhaecht, W. Sermeus
{"title":"护理路径:从临床路径到护理创新","authors":"M. Panella, K. Vanhaecht, W. Sermeus","doi":"10.1258/JICP.2009.009014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is the first issue of the International Journal of Care Pathways (IJCP) that has been edited by the European Pathway Association team. The European Pathway Association (ivzw) is an international not-for-profit association. The goal of our association is to perform international research, to organize international knowledge sharing, to support international collaboration and to advise policy-makers on care pathways. Therefore, in this issue, we have decided to focus on presenting different international experiences on care pathways inside and outside Europe. The articles in this issue of the IJCP originate from a conference that took place on 28 May 2009 in Leuven, Belgium, held to mark 10 years of care pathways in Belgium. The conference was a landmark in showing that the developments in care pathways, although still quite recent, are growing fast. Kathy Bower, principal and co-owner of the Center for Case Management in the USA, was one of the first keynote speakers, and talked about the very first beginnings of care pathways, 25 years ago, in the New England Medical Center (now Tufts Medical Center) in 1984. Their origin coincided with the onset of Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) in the USA as a method of cost-containment. DRGs were used to define homogeneous patient groups for which a prospective payment rate was set. It forced managers and clinicians to start organizing the care they were providing. In Belgium, research on care pathways began in 1996, mainly based on the experiences in the USA and in the meantime also in the UK. It was the basis for launching the Belgian–Dutch Clinical Pathway Network (www.nkp. be) in March 1999. The Network was defined as a knowledge-sharing network between academia and health-care facilities. The aim of the Network was to improve the effectiveness of developing, implementing and evaluating care pathways. The Network started with eight corporate members (all hospitals). In 2009, the number of members increased to up to more than 100 health-care organizations, broadening the scope from hospitals to home care organizations, rehabilitation centres and mental health organizations. The number of care pathways that are in development or up and running in these organizations has grown to more than 1000 different projects. The top of this list is led by conditions with a high predictive flow of care such as total hip and knee arthroplasty and normal delivery. But the list of conditions for which care pathways have been built is long and varies from simple to complex procedures, and high to low predictability. About 9% of all care pathways are crossing the boundary of their own organization, mainly in bridging the continuum between primary and secondary care. The Network in 2000 was mainly focusing on Flemish acute hospital care. As there was interest from the Netherlands and French-speaking Belgian hospitals, the Network looked for collaboration with the Dutch Institute for Quality improvement and the Université Catholic de Louvain as care pathway facilitating centres, for The Netherlands and the French-speaking region of Belgium, respectively. In 2004 the European Pathway Association (www.E-P-A.org) was launched and opened the way for international collaboration. It was exactly this Belgian and international history line that the Leuven conference of May 2009 was planned to show, as there has been incredible development during these last 10 years in pathways. At the same time, the actual care pathways do not look familiar anymore to their relatives from the early days. Although the first aim of care pathways was costcontainment, the actual focus is on quality and safety. Cost-efficiency has almost become the byproduct of wellorganized care. The main purpose is to give the right care to meet the needs of patients. Although the care pathways of the early days were very focused in bringing a team together and enhancing communication and coordination, the new care pathways are focused on integrating guidelines and evidence-based care. The care pathway is seen more and more as a means to how guidelines can be put in practice by interdisciplinary teams. The care pathway approach realize that interdisciplinary teams, often varying from a few to more than 100 members, will have the same focus, where roles are discussed and set, communication channels are discussed and most importantly, where they adhere to the same evidence-based standards. During the conference Thomas Rotter, research fellow and lead of the German–Australian Cochrane group, gave a first overview of the results of their work. Massimiliano Panella, professor in Public Health at the University of Piemonte Orientale ‘Amedeo Avogadro’ and president of the European Pathway Association, shows in his paper in this issue, the effect of working with a well-designed pathway, built based on state-of-the-art evidence on mortality and patient outcomes. The early care pathways were put on paper, which sometimes led to more administrative burden for health professionals. The new pathways of the future will be digital. They will require uniform digital platforms, communication and documentation standards, and integration of care pathways in patient records and clinical documentation systems, determining access rights. Ricard Rosique, head of the medical department of B-Braun in Spain, shows in his paper in this issue how these digital systems can be designed and work. The early pathways put a lot of their effort in organizing care by defining the team members’ role, but it still depended highly on the individual professional if these arrangements were to be put in practice. These pathways were not embedded in systems. The new care pathways will code these organizational arrangements into the systems, such as scheduling and workflow systems. Professor Martin Elliot, a paediatric","PeriodicalId":114083,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Care Pathways","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Care pathways: from clinical pathways to care innovation\",\"authors\":\"M. Panella, K. Vanhaecht, W. Sermeus\",\"doi\":\"10.1258/JICP.2009.009014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This is the first issue of the International Journal of Care Pathways (IJCP) that has been edited by the European Pathway Association team. The European Pathway Association (ivzw) is an international not-for-profit association. The goal of our association is to perform international research, to organize international knowledge sharing, to support international collaboration and to advise policy-makers on care pathways. Therefore, in this issue, we have decided to focus on presenting different international experiences on care pathways inside and outside Europe. The articles in this issue of the IJCP originate from a conference that took place on 28 May 2009 in Leuven, Belgium, held to mark 10 years of care pathways in Belgium. The conference was a landmark in showing that the developments in care pathways, although still quite recent, are growing fast. Kathy Bower, principal and co-owner of the Center for Case Management in the USA, was one of the first keynote speakers, and talked about the very first beginnings of care pathways, 25 years ago, in the New England Medical Center (now Tufts Medical Center) in 1984. Their origin coincided with the onset of Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) in the USA as a method of cost-containment. DRGs were used to define homogeneous patient groups for which a prospective payment rate was set. It forced managers and clinicians to start organizing the care they were providing. In Belgium, research on care pathways began in 1996, mainly based on the experiences in the USA and in the meantime also in the UK. It was the basis for launching the Belgian–Dutch Clinical Pathway Network (www.nkp. be) in March 1999. The Network was defined as a knowledge-sharing network between academia and health-care facilities. The aim of the Network was to improve the effectiveness of developing, implementing and evaluating care pathways. The Network started with eight corporate members (all hospitals). In 2009, the number of members increased to up to more than 100 health-care organizations, broadening the scope from hospitals to home care organizations, rehabilitation centres and mental health organizations. The number of care pathways that are in development or up and running in these organizations has grown to more than 1000 different projects. The top of this list is led by conditions with a high predictive flow of care such as total hip and knee arthroplasty and normal delivery. But the list of conditions for which care pathways have been built is long and varies from simple to complex procedures, and high to low predictability. About 9% of all care pathways are crossing the boundary of their own organization, mainly in bridging the continuum between primary and secondary care. The Network in 2000 was mainly focusing on Flemish acute hospital care. As there was interest from the Netherlands and French-speaking Belgian hospitals, the Network looked for collaboration with the Dutch Institute for Quality improvement and the Université Catholic de Louvain as care pathway facilitating centres, for The Netherlands and the French-speaking region of Belgium, respectively. In 2004 the European Pathway Association (www.E-P-A.org) was launched and opened the way for international collaboration. It was exactly this Belgian and international history line that the Leuven conference of May 2009 was planned to show, as there has been incredible development during these last 10 years in pathways. At the same time, the actual care pathways do not look familiar anymore to their relatives from the early days. Although the first aim of care pathways was costcontainment, the actual focus is on quality and safety. Cost-efficiency has almost become the byproduct of wellorganized care. The main purpose is to give the right care to meet the needs of patients. Although the care pathways of the early days were very focused in bringing a team together and enhancing communication and coordination, the new care pathways are focused on integrating guidelines and evidence-based care. The care pathway is seen more and more as a means to how guidelines can be put in practice by interdisciplinary teams. The care pathway approach realize that interdisciplinary teams, often varying from a few to more than 100 members, will have the same focus, where roles are discussed and set, communication channels are discussed and most importantly, where they adhere to the same evidence-based standards. During the conference Thomas Rotter, research fellow and lead of the German–Australian Cochrane group, gave a first overview of the results of their work. Massimiliano Panella, professor in Public Health at the University of Piemonte Orientale ‘Amedeo Avogadro’ and president of the European Pathway Association, shows in his paper in this issue, the effect of working with a well-designed pathway, built based on state-of-the-art evidence on mortality and patient outcomes. The early care pathways were put on paper, which sometimes led to more administrative burden for health professionals. The new pathways of the future will be digital. They will require uniform digital platforms, communication and documentation standards, and integration of care pathways in patient records and clinical documentation systems, determining access rights. Ricard Rosique, head of the medical department of B-Braun in Spain, shows in his paper in this issue how these digital systems can be designed and work. The early pathways put a lot of their effort in organizing care by defining the team members’ role, but it still depended highly on the individual professional if these arrangements were to be put in practice. These pathways were not embedded in systems. The new care pathways will code these organizational arrangements into the systems, such as scheduling and workflow systems. Professor Martin Elliot, a paediatric\",\"PeriodicalId\":114083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Care Pathways\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Care Pathways\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1258/JICP.2009.009014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Care Pathways","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1258/JICP.2009.009014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

这是由欧洲途径协会团队编辑的《国际护理途径杂志》(IJCP)的第一期。欧洲途径协会(ivzw)是一个国际非营利性协会。我们协会的目标是开展国际研究,组织国际知识共享,支持国际合作,并就护理途径向决策者提供建议。因此,在本期中,我们决定重点介绍欧洲内外关于护理途径的不同国际经验。本期IJCP的文章源于2009年5月28日在比利时鲁汶举行的一次会议,该会议是为纪念比利时护理途径10周年而举行的。这次会议是一个里程碑,表明护理途径的发展,尽管仍然是最近才出现的,但正在迅速发展。Kathy Bower,美国病例管理中心的负责人和共同所有人,是第一批主讲人之一,她在25年前的1984年在新英格兰医学中心(现在的塔夫茨医学中心)谈到了护理途径的最初开始。它们的起源与美国作为成本控制方法的诊断相关组(DRGs)的开始相吻合。DRGs用于定义同质患者组,并为其设定预期支付率。它迫使管理人员和临床医生开始组织他们所提供的护理。比利时对护理路径的研究始于1996年,主要借鉴了美国的经验,同时也借鉴了英国的经验。它是启动比利时-荷兰临床途径网络(www.nkp)的基础。1999年3月。该网络被定义为学术界与卫生保健机构之间的知识共享网络。该网络的目的是提高制定、实施和评估护理途径的有效性。该网络最初有8个公司成员(都是医院)。2009年,成员数量增加到100多个保健组织,范围从医院扩大到家庭护理组织、康复中心和精神健康组织。在这些组织中,正在开发或正在运行的护理途径的数量已经增长到1000多个不同的项目。排在这一榜单首位的是具有高预测流程的护理条件,如全髋关节和膝关节置换术和正常分娩。但是,已经建立的护理途径的条件清单很长,从简单到复杂的程序,从高到低的可预测性各不相同。在所有护理途径中,约有9%跨越了其所在组织的边界,主要是在初级和二级保健之间架起桥梁。2000年,该网络主要侧重于佛兰德急症医院护理。由于荷兰和讲法语的比利时医院有兴趣,该网络分别寻求与荷兰质量改进研究所和鲁汶天主教大学合作,作为荷兰和比利时法语地区的护理途径促进中心。2004年,欧洲途径协会(www.E-P-A.org)成立,为国际合作开辟了道路。2009年5月的鲁汶会议计划展示的正是这条比利时和国际的历史路线,因为在过去的10年里,道路取得了令人难以置信的发展。与此同时,从早期开始,实际的护理途径对他们的亲属来说不再熟悉。虽然护理路径的首要目标是控制成本,但实际的重点是质量和安全。成本效益几乎已经成为组织良好的护理的副产品。其主要目的是提供正确的护理,以满足患者的需要。虽然早期的护理途径非常注重将一个团队聚集在一起并加强沟通和协调,但新的护理途径侧重于将指南和循证护理结合起来。护理途径越来越被视为跨学科团队如何将指导方针付诸实践的一种手段。护理路径方法认识到跨学科团队,通常从几个到100多个成员不等,将有相同的重点,在那里讨论和设置角色,讨论沟通渠道,最重要的是,他们坚持相同的循证标准。会议期间,德国-澳大利亚Cochrane研究小组的研究员兼负责人托马斯·罗特(Thomas Rotter)首次概述了他们的工作成果。Massimiliano Panella是Piemonte Orientale ' Amedeo Avogadro大学的公共卫生教授,也是欧洲途径协会的主席,他在这期的论文中展示了设计良好的途径的效果,这种途径是基于最先进的死亡率和患者结果的证据而建立的。 早期护理途径被写在纸上,这有时会给卫生专业人员带来更多的行政负担。未来的新途径将是数字化的。它们将需要统一的数字平台、通信和文件标准,以及在患者记录和临床文件系统中整合护理途径,以确定访问权限。西班牙B-Braun医疗部门的负责人Ricard Rosique在本期的论文中展示了这些数字系统是如何设计和工作的。早期的路径通过定义团队成员的角色来组织护理,但是如果这些安排被付诸实践,它仍然高度依赖于个人专业人员。这些途径并没有嵌入系统中。新的护理途径将把这些组织安排编码到系统中,例如调度和工作流程系统。马丁·艾略特教授,儿科医生
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Care pathways: from clinical pathways to care innovation
This is the first issue of the International Journal of Care Pathways (IJCP) that has been edited by the European Pathway Association team. The European Pathway Association (ivzw) is an international not-for-profit association. The goal of our association is to perform international research, to organize international knowledge sharing, to support international collaboration and to advise policy-makers on care pathways. Therefore, in this issue, we have decided to focus on presenting different international experiences on care pathways inside and outside Europe. The articles in this issue of the IJCP originate from a conference that took place on 28 May 2009 in Leuven, Belgium, held to mark 10 years of care pathways in Belgium. The conference was a landmark in showing that the developments in care pathways, although still quite recent, are growing fast. Kathy Bower, principal and co-owner of the Center for Case Management in the USA, was one of the first keynote speakers, and talked about the very first beginnings of care pathways, 25 years ago, in the New England Medical Center (now Tufts Medical Center) in 1984. Their origin coincided with the onset of Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) in the USA as a method of cost-containment. DRGs were used to define homogeneous patient groups for which a prospective payment rate was set. It forced managers and clinicians to start organizing the care they were providing. In Belgium, research on care pathways began in 1996, mainly based on the experiences in the USA and in the meantime also in the UK. It was the basis for launching the Belgian–Dutch Clinical Pathway Network (www.nkp. be) in March 1999. The Network was defined as a knowledge-sharing network between academia and health-care facilities. The aim of the Network was to improve the effectiveness of developing, implementing and evaluating care pathways. The Network started with eight corporate members (all hospitals). In 2009, the number of members increased to up to more than 100 health-care organizations, broadening the scope from hospitals to home care organizations, rehabilitation centres and mental health organizations. The number of care pathways that are in development or up and running in these organizations has grown to more than 1000 different projects. The top of this list is led by conditions with a high predictive flow of care such as total hip and knee arthroplasty and normal delivery. But the list of conditions for which care pathways have been built is long and varies from simple to complex procedures, and high to low predictability. About 9% of all care pathways are crossing the boundary of their own organization, mainly in bridging the continuum between primary and secondary care. The Network in 2000 was mainly focusing on Flemish acute hospital care. As there was interest from the Netherlands and French-speaking Belgian hospitals, the Network looked for collaboration with the Dutch Institute for Quality improvement and the Université Catholic de Louvain as care pathway facilitating centres, for The Netherlands and the French-speaking region of Belgium, respectively. In 2004 the European Pathway Association (www.E-P-A.org) was launched and opened the way for international collaboration. It was exactly this Belgian and international history line that the Leuven conference of May 2009 was planned to show, as there has been incredible development during these last 10 years in pathways. At the same time, the actual care pathways do not look familiar anymore to their relatives from the early days. Although the first aim of care pathways was costcontainment, the actual focus is on quality and safety. Cost-efficiency has almost become the byproduct of wellorganized care. The main purpose is to give the right care to meet the needs of patients. Although the care pathways of the early days were very focused in bringing a team together and enhancing communication and coordination, the new care pathways are focused on integrating guidelines and evidence-based care. The care pathway is seen more and more as a means to how guidelines can be put in practice by interdisciplinary teams. The care pathway approach realize that interdisciplinary teams, often varying from a few to more than 100 members, will have the same focus, where roles are discussed and set, communication channels are discussed and most importantly, where they adhere to the same evidence-based standards. During the conference Thomas Rotter, research fellow and lead of the German–Australian Cochrane group, gave a first overview of the results of their work. Massimiliano Panella, professor in Public Health at the University of Piemonte Orientale ‘Amedeo Avogadro’ and president of the European Pathway Association, shows in his paper in this issue, the effect of working with a well-designed pathway, built based on state-of-the-art evidence on mortality and patient outcomes. The early care pathways were put on paper, which sometimes led to more administrative burden for health professionals. The new pathways of the future will be digital. They will require uniform digital platforms, communication and documentation standards, and integration of care pathways in patient records and clinical documentation systems, determining access rights. Ricard Rosique, head of the medical department of B-Braun in Spain, shows in his paper in this issue how these digital systems can be designed and work. The early pathways put a lot of their effort in organizing care by defining the team members’ role, but it still depended highly on the individual professional if these arrangements were to be put in practice. These pathways were not embedded in systems. The new care pathways will code these organizational arrangements into the systems, such as scheduling and workflow systems. Professor Martin Elliot, a paediatric
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Developing a clinical pathway for non-invasive ventilation Effects of care pathways in Dutch child and adolescent mental health care: a preliminary study Lean Thinking and Six Sigma: proven techniques in industry. Can they help health care? Care pathways for prostate cancer The impact of health policy: the extreme case of Abruzzo, Italy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1