基于模型的CD-SEM计量的局限性

Jordan Belissard, J. Hazart, S. Labbé, Faouzi Triki
{"title":"基于模型的CD-SEM计量的局限性","authors":"Jordan Belissard, J. Hazart, S. Labbé, Faouzi Triki","doi":"10.1117/12.2323696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the critical dimension (CD) is getting smaller following the ITRS roadmap, the scanning electron microscope (CD-SEM) is still the most general purpose tool used for non-destructive metrology in the semiconductor industry. However, we are now dealing with patterns whose dimensions are of the same order of magnitude as the electron interaction volume and therefore, the usual edge-based metrology methods fail. Like scatterometry has extended the resolution of optical imaging metrology through complex modeling of light-matter interaction, some electrons-matter simulation models have been proposed. They could be used to improve accuracy and precision of CD-SEM metrology. However, these model-based approaches also face to fundamental limits mainly due to probe size with respect to the considered structure and noise. This paper analyses these limits assuming the model is perfect and the microscope has no systematic defect. In this simulation study, we have used the model proposed by D. Nyyssonen, assuming to perfectly represent the SEM effects in the image. The feature of interest is limited to isolated trapezoidal lines with various CD, sidewall angles (SWA) and heights. We have carried out the study with several beam energies, tilts and probe sizes. Surprisingly enough, sensitivity analysis shows that with typical noise amplitude, sidewall angle can be determined with a reasonable precision using SEM images. Single tilted beam SEM images can also bring advantage to measure patterns height. Since these precision figures depend on the geometries, we provide useful graphs giving the ultimate precision for various dimensions (CD, height, SWA).","PeriodicalId":287066,"journal":{"name":"European Mask and Lithography Conference","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Limits of model-based CD-SEM metrology\",\"authors\":\"Jordan Belissard, J. Hazart, S. Labbé, Faouzi Triki\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/12.2323696\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although the critical dimension (CD) is getting smaller following the ITRS roadmap, the scanning electron microscope (CD-SEM) is still the most general purpose tool used for non-destructive metrology in the semiconductor industry. However, we are now dealing with patterns whose dimensions are of the same order of magnitude as the electron interaction volume and therefore, the usual edge-based metrology methods fail. Like scatterometry has extended the resolution of optical imaging metrology through complex modeling of light-matter interaction, some electrons-matter simulation models have been proposed. They could be used to improve accuracy and precision of CD-SEM metrology. However, these model-based approaches also face to fundamental limits mainly due to probe size with respect to the considered structure and noise. This paper analyses these limits assuming the model is perfect and the microscope has no systematic defect. In this simulation study, we have used the model proposed by D. Nyyssonen, assuming to perfectly represent the SEM effects in the image. The feature of interest is limited to isolated trapezoidal lines with various CD, sidewall angles (SWA) and heights. We have carried out the study with several beam energies, tilts and probe sizes. Surprisingly enough, sensitivity analysis shows that with typical noise amplitude, sidewall angle can be determined with a reasonable precision using SEM images. Single tilted beam SEM images can also bring advantage to measure patterns height. Since these precision figures depend on the geometries, we provide useful graphs giving the ultimate precision for various dimensions (CD, height, SWA).\",\"PeriodicalId\":287066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Mask and Lithography Conference\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Mask and Lithography Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2323696\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Mask and Lithography Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2323696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

尽管随着ITRS的发展,关键尺寸(CD)越来越小,但扫描电子显微镜(CD- sem)仍然是半导体行业中用于无损测量的最通用工具。然而,我们现在处理的模式的尺寸与电子相互作用体积的数量级相同,因此,通常的基于边缘的测量方法失败了。散射测量通过对光-物质相互作用的复杂建模扩展了光学成像计量的分辨率,一些电子-物质模拟模型也被提出。它们可用于提高CD-SEM计量的准确度和精密度。然而,这些基于模型的方法也面临着基本的限制,主要是由于相对于所考虑的结构和噪声的探针尺寸。本文在假设模型是完善的,显微镜没有系统缺陷的情况下对这些限制进行了分析。在本次模拟研究中,我们使用了D. Nyyssonen提出的模型,假设能很好地代表图像中的SEM效应。感兴趣的特征仅限于具有不同CD,侧壁角(SWA)和高度的孤立梯形线。我们用不同的光束能量、倾斜角度和探针尺寸进行了研究。令人惊讶的是,灵敏度分析表明,在典型的噪声幅值下,利用SEM图像可以以合理的精度确定侧壁角。单倾斜光束扫描电镜图像也具有测量图案高度的优势。由于这些精度数字取决于几何形状,我们提供了有用的图表,给出了各种尺寸(CD、高度、SWA)的最终精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Limits of model-based CD-SEM metrology
Although the critical dimension (CD) is getting smaller following the ITRS roadmap, the scanning electron microscope (CD-SEM) is still the most general purpose tool used for non-destructive metrology in the semiconductor industry. However, we are now dealing with patterns whose dimensions are of the same order of magnitude as the electron interaction volume and therefore, the usual edge-based metrology methods fail. Like scatterometry has extended the resolution of optical imaging metrology through complex modeling of light-matter interaction, some electrons-matter simulation models have been proposed. They could be used to improve accuracy and precision of CD-SEM metrology. However, these model-based approaches also face to fundamental limits mainly due to probe size with respect to the considered structure and noise. This paper analyses these limits assuming the model is perfect and the microscope has no systematic defect. In this simulation study, we have used the model proposed by D. Nyyssonen, assuming to perfectly represent the SEM effects in the image. The feature of interest is limited to isolated trapezoidal lines with various CD, sidewall angles (SWA) and heights. We have carried out the study with several beam energies, tilts and probe sizes. Surprisingly enough, sensitivity analysis shows that with typical noise amplitude, sidewall angle can be determined with a reasonable precision using SEM images. Single tilted beam SEM images can also bring advantage to measure patterns height. Since these precision figures depend on the geometries, we provide useful graphs giving the ultimate precision for various dimensions (CD, height, SWA).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Synergy between quantum computing and semiconductor technology New registration calibration strategies for MBMW tools by PROVE measurements OPC flow for non-conventional layouts: specific application to optical diffusers Lithographic performance of resist ma-N 1402 in an e-beam/i-line stepper intra-level mix and match approach High-precision optical constant characterization of materials in the EUV spectral range: from large research facilities to laboratory-based instruments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1