使用屏障材料数据的污染物迁移模型的比较分析

J. L. Daniels, C. Chien, V. Ogunro, H. Inyang
{"title":"使用屏障材料数据的污染物迁移模型的比较分析","authors":"J. L. Daniels, C. Chien, V. Ogunro, H. Inyang","doi":"10.1080/10588330091134365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Waste containment facilities are often composed of barriers such as liners, grout curtains, and slurry walls. The primary design objective for such systems is to mitigate against the release and transport of contaminants. It is often necessary to quantify barrier effectiveness in order to conduct risk and exposure assessments. The extent to which a barrier material is effective can be assessed using analytical methods, laboratory testing, and field monitoring. Obviously, there is a great deal of time and expense associated with both laboratory and field monitoring, making modeling an attractive first alternative. There are, however, numerous solutions to the well-known advection-dispersion equation that vary in accuracy and applicability, depending on initial and boundary conditions. Moreover, most of the equations formulated for transport through porous media were developed for use in aquifer rather than barrier material. Prudent model selection involves matching the conditions to be analyzed with the appropriate mathematical description. In this article, five transport equations are analyzed and compared with laboratory results and projected field conditions for the migration of Pb2+ through soil-bentonite. After 30 days of continuous source injection, measurable concentrations of lead were only detected in the first 0.5 cm of a column of soil-bentonite. All five solutions predicted approximately the same level of penetration for the column tests; however, significant differences emerged after extrapolation to field conditions. For barrier design purposes, the only equations recommended are Equation 3 (the complete solution from Ogata and Banks [1961]) and Equation 6 (Crank's [1956] solution to Fick's Second Law).","PeriodicalId":433778,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Soil Contamination","volume":"2004 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Analysis of Contaminant Migration Models Using Barrier Material Data\",\"authors\":\"J. L. Daniels, C. Chien, V. Ogunro, H. Inyang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10588330091134365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Waste containment facilities are often composed of barriers such as liners, grout curtains, and slurry walls. The primary design objective for such systems is to mitigate against the release and transport of contaminants. It is often necessary to quantify barrier effectiveness in order to conduct risk and exposure assessments. The extent to which a barrier material is effective can be assessed using analytical methods, laboratory testing, and field monitoring. Obviously, there is a great deal of time and expense associated with both laboratory and field monitoring, making modeling an attractive first alternative. There are, however, numerous solutions to the well-known advection-dispersion equation that vary in accuracy and applicability, depending on initial and boundary conditions. Moreover, most of the equations formulated for transport through porous media were developed for use in aquifer rather than barrier material. Prudent model selection involves matching the conditions to be analyzed with the appropriate mathematical description. In this article, five transport equations are analyzed and compared with laboratory results and projected field conditions for the migration of Pb2+ through soil-bentonite. After 30 days of continuous source injection, measurable concentrations of lead were only detected in the first 0.5 cm of a column of soil-bentonite. All five solutions predicted approximately the same level of penetration for the column tests; however, significant differences emerged after extrapolation to field conditions. For barrier design purposes, the only equations recommended are Equation 3 (the complete solution from Ogata and Banks [1961]) and Equation 6 (Crank's [1956] solution to Fick's Second Law).\",\"PeriodicalId\":433778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Soil Contamination\",\"volume\":\"2004 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Soil Contamination\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10588330091134365\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Soil Contamination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10588330091134365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

废物控制设施通常由衬垫、灌浆幕和泥浆墙等屏障组成。这种系统的主要设计目标是减轻污染物的释放和运输。为了进行风险和暴露评估,通常有必要量化屏障的有效性。阻隔材料的有效程度可以通过分析方法、实验室测试和现场监测来评估。显然,实验室和现场监测都需要花费大量的时间和费用,这使得建模成为有吸引力的首选方案。然而,众所周知的平流-色散方程有许多解,它们的精度和适用性各不相同,取决于初始条件和边界条件。此外,大多数关于多孔介质输运的公式都是针对含水层而不是屏障材料而制定的。谨慎的模型选择包括将要分析的条件与适当的数学描述相匹配。本文对Pb2+在土壤-膨润土中迁移的5种输运方程进行了分析,并与实验室结果和预测的现场条件进行了比较。连续源注入30天后,仅在土壤-膨润土柱的前0.5 cm处检测到可测量浓度的铅。在柱测试中,所有五种解决方案预测的渗透水平大致相同;然而,根据现场条件外推后,出现了显著差异。出于屏障设计的目的,唯一推荐的方程是方程3(绪方和班克斯[1961]的完整解)和方程6(克兰克[1956]对菲克第二定律的解)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparative Analysis of Contaminant Migration Models Using Barrier Material Data
Waste containment facilities are often composed of barriers such as liners, grout curtains, and slurry walls. The primary design objective for such systems is to mitigate against the release and transport of contaminants. It is often necessary to quantify barrier effectiveness in order to conduct risk and exposure assessments. The extent to which a barrier material is effective can be assessed using analytical methods, laboratory testing, and field monitoring. Obviously, there is a great deal of time and expense associated with both laboratory and field monitoring, making modeling an attractive first alternative. There are, however, numerous solutions to the well-known advection-dispersion equation that vary in accuracy and applicability, depending on initial and boundary conditions. Moreover, most of the equations formulated for transport through porous media were developed for use in aquifer rather than barrier material. Prudent model selection involves matching the conditions to be analyzed with the appropriate mathematical description. In this article, five transport equations are analyzed and compared with laboratory results and projected field conditions for the migration of Pb2+ through soil-bentonite. After 30 days of continuous source injection, measurable concentrations of lead were only detected in the first 0.5 cm of a column of soil-bentonite. All five solutions predicted approximately the same level of penetration for the column tests; however, significant differences emerged after extrapolation to field conditions. For barrier design purposes, the only equations recommended are Equation 3 (the complete solution from Ogata and Banks [1961]) and Equation 6 (Crank's [1956] solution to Fick's Second Law).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bioremediation of Soil Contaminated with Explosives at the Naval Weapons Station Yorktown Settlement Prediction for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills Using Power Creep Law Quantification of Compositional Changes of Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID and GC/MS during a Long-Term Bioremediation Experiment A Method for Assessing Leaching Potential for Petroleum Hydrocarbons Release Sites: Multiphase and Multisubstance Equilibrium Partitioning Monte Carlo Vadose Zone Model for Soil Remedial Criteria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1