立法教育作为民主公民教育的意义——从“博伊特尔舍巴赫共识”的角度看。

Ji-won Jeong
{"title":"立法教育作为民主公民教育的意义——从“博伊特尔舍巴赫共识”的角度看。","authors":"Ji-won Jeong","doi":"10.58555/li.2022.1.171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Even though they are members of a country where the ideology of democracy is protected by the constitution, it is extremely rare for e ach citizen to actually feel that he or she is exercising sovereignty except for voting. Existing forms of participation, such as public hearings, had to invest a lot of time and effort. However, as ‘the Blue Hous e Shinmungo’ and ‘Public Petition’ have recently been activated, the arena where people can express their thought to urge social change is expanding. Nevertheless, the role of the people is only to suggest opinions and not to participate in the process of finding a solution, so it is extremely rare for the people to feel a sense of efficacy as a sovereign. In the educational field, various educational activities are being conducted to develop competence as a democratic citizen, but the y face various limitations, such as non-cooperative attitudes of relat ed institutions, and debates over the political neutrality of teachers. \nIn order to overcome these limitations, legislative education is drawi ng attention as an alternative to realizing democratic citizenship edu cation. \n'Beurelsbacher Konsens', which is the basis of democratic citizens hip education, is based on Prohibition against Overwhelming the Pupil, Treating Controversial Subjects as Controversial the principle of controversy, and Giving Weight to the Personal Interests of Pupils. Af ter the consensus was released, various criticisms were raised, such as the possibility of overwhelming and edification in a covert way, the passive attitude of teachers to avoid overwhelming and edification, the extent of controversy in actual classroom situations, and indiffere nce to the development of the community. In order to overcome criticism and realize consensus-based democratic citizenship education, teachers should be aware of the possibility of overwhelming and edif ication, but as a guide, they should introduce various viewpoints on the issues so that students develop their ability to analyze them based on individual perspectives and interests. Furthermore, it is necessary to provide various opportunities for social participation while gradually expanding the scope to classes, schools, local communities, and countries so that they can seek symbiosis with the community, not just making decisions for the realization of individual interests. …","PeriodicalId":115318,"journal":{"name":"Center for Legislative Studies, Gyeongin National University of Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implications of Legislative Education as Democratic Citizenship Education from the Point of View of the ‘Beutelsbacher Konsens’.\",\"authors\":\"Ji-won Jeong\",\"doi\":\"10.58555/li.2022.1.171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Even though they are members of a country where the ideology of democracy is protected by the constitution, it is extremely rare for e ach citizen to actually feel that he or she is exercising sovereignty except for voting. Existing forms of participation, such as public hearings, had to invest a lot of time and effort. However, as ‘the Blue Hous e Shinmungo’ and ‘Public Petition’ have recently been activated, the arena where people can express their thought to urge social change is expanding. Nevertheless, the role of the people is only to suggest opinions and not to participate in the process of finding a solution, so it is extremely rare for the people to feel a sense of efficacy as a sovereign. In the educational field, various educational activities are being conducted to develop competence as a democratic citizen, but the y face various limitations, such as non-cooperative attitudes of relat ed institutions, and debates over the political neutrality of teachers. \\nIn order to overcome these limitations, legislative education is drawi ng attention as an alternative to realizing democratic citizenship edu cation. \\n'Beurelsbacher Konsens', which is the basis of democratic citizens hip education, is based on Prohibition against Overwhelming the Pupil, Treating Controversial Subjects as Controversial the principle of controversy, and Giving Weight to the Personal Interests of Pupils. Af ter the consensus was released, various criticisms were raised, such as the possibility of overwhelming and edification in a covert way, the passive attitude of teachers to avoid overwhelming and edification, the extent of controversy in actual classroom situations, and indiffere nce to the development of the community. In order to overcome criticism and realize consensus-based democratic citizenship education, teachers should be aware of the possibility of overwhelming and edif ication, but as a guide, they should introduce various viewpoints on the issues so that students develop their ability to analyze them based on individual perspectives and interests. Furthermore, it is necessary to provide various opportunities for social participation while gradually expanding the scope to classes, schools, local communities, and countries so that they can seek symbiosis with the community, not just making decisions for the realization of individual interests. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":115318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Center for Legislative Studies, Gyeongin National University of Education\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Center for Legislative Studies, Gyeongin National University of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58555/li.2022.1.171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Center for Legislative Studies, Gyeongin National University of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58555/li.2022.1.171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然是民主主义意识形态受到宪法保护的国家的一员,但除了投票之外,每个公民真正感受到自己行使主权的情况非常罕见。现有的参与形式,如公开听证会,必须投入大量的时间和精力。但是最近,随着“青瓦台-新门”和“国民请愿”的活跃,为敦促社会变化而表达意见的舞台正在扩大。然而,人民的作用只是提出意见,而不是参与寻找解决方案的过程,因此人民很少有作为主权者的效能感。在教育领域,为了培养民主公民的能力,正在进行各种各样的教育活动,但相关机构的不合作态度、教师的政治中立性争论等种种限制使他们望而却步。为了克服这些局限性,立法教育作为实现民主公民教育的一种替代方式正受到人们的关注。民主公民教育的基础“Beurelsbacher Konsens”以“禁止压倒学生”、“把有争议的话题当作有争议的话题”、“重视学生的个人利益”为基础。共识发布后,各种批评纷纷提出,如可能以隐蔽的方式压倒和熏陶,教师对避免压倒和熏陶的被动态度,课堂实际情况的争议程度,以及对社区发展的漠不关心。为了克服批评,实现基于共识的民主公民教育,教师应该意识到压倒和启发的可能性,但作为一个向导,他们应该介绍各种观点的问题,以培养学生从个人的角度和兴趣来分析问题的能力。其次,要提供各种社会参与的机会,并逐步将范围扩大到班级、学校、地方社区和国家,使他们能够寻求与社区的共生,而不仅仅是为了实现个人利益而做出决策。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implications of Legislative Education as Democratic Citizenship Education from the Point of View of the ‘Beutelsbacher Konsens’.
Even though they are members of a country where the ideology of democracy is protected by the constitution, it is extremely rare for e ach citizen to actually feel that he or she is exercising sovereignty except for voting. Existing forms of participation, such as public hearings, had to invest a lot of time and effort. However, as ‘the Blue Hous e Shinmungo’ and ‘Public Petition’ have recently been activated, the arena where people can express their thought to urge social change is expanding. Nevertheless, the role of the people is only to suggest opinions and not to participate in the process of finding a solution, so it is extremely rare for the people to feel a sense of efficacy as a sovereign. In the educational field, various educational activities are being conducted to develop competence as a democratic citizen, but the y face various limitations, such as non-cooperative attitudes of relat ed institutions, and debates over the political neutrality of teachers. In order to overcome these limitations, legislative education is drawi ng attention as an alternative to realizing democratic citizenship edu cation. 'Beurelsbacher Konsens', which is the basis of democratic citizens hip education, is based on Prohibition against Overwhelming the Pupil, Treating Controversial Subjects as Controversial the principle of controversy, and Giving Weight to the Personal Interests of Pupils. Af ter the consensus was released, various criticisms were raised, such as the possibility of overwhelming and edification in a covert way, the passive attitude of teachers to avoid overwhelming and edification, the extent of controversy in actual classroom situations, and indiffere nce to the development of the community. In order to overcome criticism and realize consensus-based democratic citizenship education, teachers should be aware of the possibility of overwhelming and edif ication, but as a guide, they should introduce various viewpoints on the issues so that students develop their ability to analyze them based on individual perspectives and interests. Furthermore, it is necessary to provide various opportunities for social participation while gradually expanding the scope to classes, schools, local communities, and countries so that they can seek symbiosis with the community, not just making decisions for the realization of individual interests. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
입법영향분석 어떻게 할 것인가? Principles and Limitations of Using Personal Location Data for Public Interest: Implications for Legislative Technology of Personal Data Protection Act A study on the revision of the “Security Guard Act” and the establishment of 'Congestion Guard' in Japan The Normative Power of the Inter-Korean Agreement The Gap in the Legal Texts and the Supplementation by Interpretation - Focusing on the provisions and interpretations of property rights under Article 23 of the Constitution -
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1