鸽子笼中的组织

B. Gould
{"title":"鸽子笼中的组织","authors":"B. Gould","doi":"10.1108/EUM0000000006629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Discusses organizations and their differing theories, as promoted by managers, but wonders whether they are bewildering to managers who may not know where to start. Posits that there are four potentially different theory categories and these are: inside, outside, individuals, and groups. Uses a Figure to aid in explanation of these four basic aspects of organizations. Concludes there is no such thing as good organization ‐ it is relative ‐ good in one context may also be bad in another.","PeriodicalId":178456,"journal":{"name":"The Antidote","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Organizations in pigeonholes\",\"authors\":\"B. Gould\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/EUM0000000006629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Discusses organizations and their differing theories, as promoted by managers, but wonders whether they are bewildering to managers who may not know where to start. Posits that there are four potentially different theory categories and these are: inside, outside, individuals, and groups. Uses a Figure to aid in explanation of these four basic aspects of organizations. Concludes there is no such thing as good organization ‐ it is relative ‐ good in one context may also be bad in another.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Antidote\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Antidote\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006629\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Antidote","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

讨论组织及其不同的理论,正如管理者所提倡的,但想知道他们是否会让那些可能不知道从哪里开始的管理者感到困惑。假设存在四种可能不同的理论类别分别是:内部,外部,个人和群体。使用一个图来帮助解释组织的这四个基本方面。结论是没有好的组织——它是相对的——在一种情况下好的组织可能在另一种情况下也不好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Organizations in pigeonholes
Discusses organizations and their differing theories, as promoted by managers, but wonders whether they are bewildering to managers who may not know where to start. Posits that there are four potentially different theory categories and these are: inside, outside, individuals, and groups. Uses a Figure to aid in explanation of these four basic aspects of organizations. Concludes there is no such thing as good organization ‐ it is relative ‐ good in one context may also be bad in another.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Change that can kill off great, well‐run companies What does it mean to be flexible Two contrasting theories of change: Theory E and Theory O Change just won’t go away The gap between rhetoric and reality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1