仿人机器人全身人造皮肤的空间标定:比较自接触、三维重建和基于cad的标定

Lukas Rustler, Bohumila Potočná, Michal Polic, K. Štěpánová, M. Hoffmann
{"title":"仿人机器人全身人造皮肤的空间标定:比较自接触、三维重建和基于cad的标定","authors":"Lukas Rustler, Bohumila Potočná, Michal Polic, K. Štěpánová, M. Hoffmann","doi":"10.1109/HUMANOIDS47582.2021.9555806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Robots were largely missing the sense of touch for decades. As artificial sensitive skins covering large areas of robot bodies are starting to appear, to be useful to the machines, sensor positions on the robot body are needed. In this work, a Nao humanoid robot was retrofitted with pressure-sensitive skin on the head, torso, and arms. We experimentally compare the accuracy and effort associated with the following skin spatial calibration approaches and their combinations: (i) combining CAD models and skin layout in 2D, (ii) 3D reconstruction from images, (iii) using robot kinematics to calibrate skin by self-contact. To acquire 3D positions of taxels on individual skin parts, methods (i) and (ii) were similarly laborious but 3D reconstruction was more accurate. To align these 3D point clouds with the robot kinematics, two variants of self-contact were employed: skin-on-skin and utilization of a custom end effector (finger). In combination with the 3D reconstruction data, mean calibration errors below the radius of individual sensors were achieved (2 mm). Significant perturbation of more than 100 torso taxel positions could be corrected using self-contact calibration, reaching approx. 3 mm mean error. This work is not a proof of concept but deployment of the approaches at scale: the outcome is actual spatial calibration of all 970 taxels on the robot body. As the different calibration approaches are evaluated in isolation as well as in different combinations, this work provides a guideline applicable to spatial calibration of different sensor arrays.","PeriodicalId":320510,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE-RAS 20th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spatial calibration of whole-body artificial skin on a humanoid robot: comparing self-contact, 3D reconstruction, and CAD-based calibration\",\"authors\":\"Lukas Rustler, Bohumila Potočná, Michal Polic, K. Štěpánová, M. Hoffmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HUMANOIDS47582.2021.9555806\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Robots were largely missing the sense of touch for decades. As artificial sensitive skins covering large areas of robot bodies are starting to appear, to be useful to the machines, sensor positions on the robot body are needed. In this work, a Nao humanoid robot was retrofitted with pressure-sensitive skin on the head, torso, and arms. We experimentally compare the accuracy and effort associated with the following skin spatial calibration approaches and their combinations: (i) combining CAD models and skin layout in 2D, (ii) 3D reconstruction from images, (iii) using robot kinematics to calibrate skin by self-contact. To acquire 3D positions of taxels on individual skin parts, methods (i) and (ii) were similarly laborious but 3D reconstruction was more accurate. To align these 3D point clouds with the robot kinematics, two variants of self-contact were employed: skin-on-skin and utilization of a custom end effector (finger). In combination with the 3D reconstruction data, mean calibration errors below the radius of individual sensors were achieved (2 mm). Significant perturbation of more than 100 torso taxel positions could be corrected using self-contact calibration, reaching approx. 3 mm mean error. This work is not a proof of concept but deployment of the approaches at scale: the outcome is actual spatial calibration of all 970 taxels on the robot body. As the different calibration approaches are evaluated in isolation as well as in different combinations, this work provides a guideline applicable to spatial calibration of different sensor arrays.\",\"PeriodicalId\":320510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE-RAS 20th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids)\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE-RAS 20th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HUMANOIDS47582.2021.9555806\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE-RAS 20th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HUMANOIDS47582.2021.9555806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

几十年来,机器人在很大程度上失去了触觉。随着覆盖大面积机器人身体的人工敏感皮肤开始出现,为了使机器人有用,需要在机器人身体上安装传感器位置。在这项工作中,一个Nao人形机器人在头部、躯干和手臂上安装了压力敏感皮肤。我们通过实验比较了以下皮肤空间校准方法及其组合的准确性和工作量:(i)结合CAD模型和2D皮肤布局,(ii)从图像中重建3D, (iii)使用机器人运动学通过自接触校准皮肤。为了获得taxels在单个皮肤部位上的三维位置,方法(i)和(ii)同样费力,但3D重建更准确。为了将这些3D点云与机器人运动学对齐,采用了两种自接触:皮肤对皮肤和使用自定义末端执行器(手指)。结合三维重建数据,获得了单个传感器半径以下的平均校准误差(2mm)。超过100个躯干taxel位置的显著摄动可以使用自接触校准进行校正,达到约。平均误差3毫米。这项工作不是概念验证,而是大规模部署方法:结果是机器人身体上所有970个taxels的实际空间校准。由于对不同的校准方法分别进行了单独和不同组合的评估,本工作提供了适用于不同传感器阵列空间校准的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Spatial calibration of whole-body artificial skin on a humanoid robot: comparing self-contact, 3D reconstruction, and CAD-based calibration
Robots were largely missing the sense of touch for decades. As artificial sensitive skins covering large areas of robot bodies are starting to appear, to be useful to the machines, sensor positions on the robot body are needed. In this work, a Nao humanoid robot was retrofitted with pressure-sensitive skin on the head, torso, and arms. We experimentally compare the accuracy and effort associated with the following skin spatial calibration approaches and their combinations: (i) combining CAD models and skin layout in 2D, (ii) 3D reconstruction from images, (iii) using robot kinematics to calibrate skin by self-contact. To acquire 3D positions of taxels on individual skin parts, methods (i) and (ii) were similarly laborious but 3D reconstruction was more accurate. To align these 3D point clouds with the robot kinematics, two variants of self-contact were employed: skin-on-skin and utilization of a custom end effector (finger). In combination with the 3D reconstruction data, mean calibration errors below the radius of individual sensors were achieved (2 mm). Significant perturbation of more than 100 torso taxel positions could be corrected using self-contact calibration, reaching approx. 3 mm mean error. This work is not a proof of concept but deployment of the approaches at scale: the outcome is actual spatial calibration of all 970 taxels on the robot body. As the different calibration approaches are evaluated in isolation as well as in different combinations, this work provides a guideline applicable to spatial calibration of different sensor arrays.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Android Printing: Towards On-Demand Android Development Employing Multi-Material 3-D Printer An Integrated, Force-Sensitive, Impedance Controlled, Tendon-Driven Wrist: Design, Modeling, and Control Identification of Common Force-based Robot Skills from the Human and Robot Perspective Safe Data-Driven Contact-Rich Manipulation Multi-Fidelity Receding Horizon Planning for Multi-Contact Locomotion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1