改进学生小组项目的风险框架

Diana Kirk, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, E. Tempero
{"title":"改进学生小组项目的风险框架","authors":"Diana Kirk, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, E. Tempero","doi":"10.1145/3564721.3564730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tertiary educators in software related topics experience issues during project-based group assessments. Our long term goal is to help educators manage the challenges that inevitably occur by providing a risk planning mechanism for students that suits the needs of the course. In this paper, we describe the first iteration of an action research study to trial a risk framework for academic group projects. Our aims were to understand how educators appropriate the framework to suit their course, gain insight into students’ understanding of risk concepts and refine the framework. A questionnaire based on the framework was distributed to students in three 12-week computer science (CS) courses. We found that most students reported few issues. Participating courses used the framework in different ways. Students lacked a holistic understanding of risk management concepts, implying the need to formally introduce these. Our study progresses the understanding of the issues experienced in academic group projects and contributes a revised framework to help manage these. In future iterations, we will investigate links between issues and project characteristics and establish a repository of mitigation strategies that is project-specific.","PeriodicalId":149708,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 22nd Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refining a Risk Framework for Student Group Projects\",\"authors\":\"Diana Kirk, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, E. Tempero\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3564721.3564730\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Tertiary educators in software related topics experience issues during project-based group assessments. Our long term goal is to help educators manage the challenges that inevitably occur by providing a risk planning mechanism for students that suits the needs of the course. In this paper, we describe the first iteration of an action research study to trial a risk framework for academic group projects. Our aims were to understand how educators appropriate the framework to suit their course, gain insight into students’ understanding of risk concepts and refine the framework. A questionnaire based on the framework was distributed to students in three 12-week computer science (CS) courses. We found that most students reported few issues. Participating courses used the framework in different ways. Students lacked a holistic understanding of risk management concepts, implying the need to formally introduce these. Our study progresses the understanding of the issues experienced in academic group projects and contributes a revised framework to help manage these. In future iterations, we will investigate links between issues and project characteristics and establish a repository of mitigation strategies that is project-specific.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 22nd Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 22nd Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3564721.3564730\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 22nd Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3564721.3564730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在基于项目的小组评估中,软件相关主题的高等教育工作者会遇到问题。我们的长期目标是通过为学生提供适合课程需要的风险规划机制,帮助教育工作者应对不可避免的挑战。在本文中,我们描述了一项行动研究的第一次迭代,以试验学术小组项目的风险框架。我们的目标是了解教育工作者如何使框架适合他们的课程,深入了解学生对风险概念的理解并完善框架。在三个为期12周的计算机科学(CS)课程中,一份基于该框架的问卷被分发给学生。我们发现大多数学生报告的问题很少。参与课程以不同的方式使用该框架。学生缺乏对风险管理概念的全面理解,这意味着需要正式介绍这些概念。我们的研究促进了对学术小组项目中遇到的问题的理解,并提供了一个修订的框架来帮助管理这些问题。在未来的迭代中,我们将研究问题与项目特征之间的联系,并建立一个特定于项目的缓解策略存储库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Refining a Risk Framework for Student Group Projects
Tertiary educators in software related topics experience issues during project-based group assessments. Our long term goal is to help educators manage the challenges that inevitably occur by providing a risk planning mechanism for students that suits the needs of the course. In this paper, we describe the first iteration of an action research study to trial a risk framework for academic group projects. Our aims were to understand how educators appropriate the framework to suit their course, gain insight into students’ understanding of risk concepts and refine the framework. A questionnaire based on the framework was distributed to students in three 12-week computer science (CS) courses. We found that most students reported few issues. Participating courses used the framework in different ways. Students lacked a holistic understanding of risk management concepts, implying the need to formally introduce these. Our study progresses the understanding of the issues experienced in academic group projects and contributes a revised framework to help manage these. In future iterations, we will investigate links between issues and project characteristics and establish a repository of mitigation strategies that is project-specific.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Examining the Use of Computational Thinking Skills When Solving Bebras Tasks Trends From Computing Education Research Conferences: Increasing Submissions and Decreasing Acceptance Rates An Algorithm for Generating Explainable Corrections to Student Code High School Students’ Sense-making of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning The Impact of Solving Adaptive Parsons Problems with Common and Uncommon Solutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1