超声引导下经皮肾造口术在ESWL前后的应用:4年经验。

E Montanari, G Zanetti, A Guarneri, A Trinchieri, M Seveso, E Austoni
{"title":"超声引导下经皮肾造口术在ESWL前后的应用:4年经验。","authors":"E Montanari,&nbsp;G Zanetti,&nbsp;A Guarneri,&nbsp;A Trinchieri,&nbsp;M Seveso,&nbsp;E Austoni","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We evaluated the usefulness of percutaneous nephrostomy in 1700 patients treated for reno-ureteral stones by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). Out of this group 81 patients (5.8%) underwent echo-guided percutaneous nephrostomy (EPCN): the procedure has been performed in local anesthesia in 38% of the cases (31 pts) before SWL and in 62% (50 pts) after. The majority of EPCN were carried out for the presence of acute or chronic ureteral obstruction with echographic evaluable dilation of pyelocaliceal system when retrograde ureteral manipulations failed or were considered unsuitable. EPCN before SWL was performed because of ureteral stone and uncomplicated pyelocalyceal dilation (19 pts); ureteral stone, pyelocaliceal dilation and fever > 38 degrees C (3 pts); ureteral stone, pyelocalyceal dilation and functional IVP exclusion (5 pts); pyelic stone in solitary kidney (1 pts); ureteral stones in pregnancy (2 pts). EPCN after SWL was performed because of uncomplicated, persistent pile-up (31 pts); ureteral pile-up complicated by fever and colics (9 pts); ureteral obstructing fragments (2 pts); double J obstruction by stone dust (3 pts); persistent ureteral pile-up around double J (3 pts); anuria in solitary kidney (1 pt). Out of the patients who underwent EPCN before SWL 13% were stone free and without drainage at discharge, 77% had passable stone fragments at discharge and drainage has been taken out at 15-30 days check up, 10% had unbroken stone and underwent with drainage to ureterolithotripsy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":8343,"journal":{"name":"Archivio italiano di urologia, nefrologia, andrologia : organo ufficiale dell'Associazione per la ricerca in urologia = Urological, nephrological, and andrological sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Use of ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrostomy before and after ESWL: 4 years of experience].\",\"authors\":\"E Montanari,&nbsp;G Zanetti,&nbsp;A Guarneri,&nbsp;A Trinchieri,&nbsp;M Seveso,&nbsp;E Austoni\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We evaluated the usefulness of percutaneous nephrostomy in 1700 patients treated for reno-ureteral stones by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). Out of this group 81 patients (5.8%) underwent echo-guided percutaneous nephrostomy (EPCN): the procedure has been performed in local anesthesia in 38% of the cases (31 pts) before SWL and in 62% (50 pts) after. The majority of EPCN were carried out for the presence of acute or chronic ureteral obstruction with echographic evaluable dilation of pyelocaliceal system when retrograde ureteral manipulations failed or were considered unsuitable. EPCN before SWL was performed because of ureteral stone and uncomplicated pyelocalyceal dilation (19 pts); ureteral stone, pyelocaliceal dilation and fever > 38 degrees C (3 pts); ureteral stone, pyelocalyceal dilation and functional IVP exclusion (5 pts); pyelic stone in solitary kidney (1 pts); ureteral stones in pregnancy (2 pts). EPCN after SWL was performed because of uncomplicated, persistent pile-up (31 pts); ureteral pile-up complicated by fever and colics (9 pts); ureteral obstructing fragments (2 pts); double J obstruction by stone dust (3 pts); persistent ureteral pile-up around double J (3 pts); anuria in solitary kidney (1 pt). Out of the patients who underwent EPCN before SWL 13% were stone free and without drainage at discharge, 77% had passable stone fragments at discharge and drainage has been taken out at 15-30 days check up, 10% had unbroken stone and underwent with drainage to ureterolithotripsy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archivio italiano di urologia, nefrologia, andrologia : organo ufficiale dell'Associazione per la ricerca in urologia = Urological, nephrological, and andrological sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archivio italiano di urologia, nefrologia, andrologia : organo ufficiale dell'Associazione per la ricerca in urologia = Urological, nephrological, and andrological sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivio italiano di urologia, nefrologia, andrologia : organo ufficiale dell'Associazione per la ricerca in urologia = Urological, nephrological, and andrological sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们评估经皮肾造口术在1700例经体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石的有效性。在本组中,81例患者(5.8%)接受了超声引导下的经皮肾造口术(EPCN): SWL前和SWL后分别有38%(31例)和62%(50例)的患者在局麻下进行了该手术。大多数EPCN是在输尿管逆行操作失败或被认为不合适时,出现急性或慢性输尿管梗阻并伴有肾盂局部系统超声可评估扩张的情况下进行的。由于输尿管结石和无并发症的肾盂扩张,在SWL前进行EPCN(19例);输尿管结石、肾盂扩张、发热> 38℃(3例);输尿管结石、肾盂扩张和功能性IVP排除(5例);孤立肾肾盂结石(1例);妊娠期输尿管结石(2例)。由于不复杂的持续性堆积,SWL后进行EPCN(31例);输尿管堆积并发发热和绞痛(9例);输尿管阻塞碎片(2例);双J石尘阻塞(3分);双J周围持续性输尿管堆积(3分);单肾无尿(1例)。在SWL前行EPCN的患者中,13%的患者在出院时无结石且无引流,77%的患者在出院时有可通过的结石碎片,在15-30天检查时已抽出引流,10%的患者结石未破裂并行引流至输尿管碎石术。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Use of ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrostomy before and after ESWL: 4 years of experience].

We evaluated the usefulness of percutaneous nephrostomy in 1700 patients treated for reno-ureteral stones by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). Out of this group 81 patients (5.8%) underwent echo-guided percutaneous nephrostomy (EPCN): the procedure has been performed in local anesthesia in 38% of the cases (31 pts) before SWL and in 62% (50 pts) after. The majority of EPCN were carried out for the presence of acute or chronic ureteral obstruction with echographic evaluable dilation of pyelocaliceal system when retrograde ureteral manipulations failed or were considered unsuitable. EPCN before SWL was performed because of ureteral stone and uncomplicated pyelocalyceal dilation (19 pts); ureteral stone, pyelocaliceal dilation and fever > 38 degrees C (3 pts); ureteral stone, pyelocalyceal dilation and functional IVP exclusion (5 pts); pyelic stone in solitary kidney (1 pts); ureteral stones in pregnancy (2 pts). EPCN after SWL was performed because of uncomplicated, persistent pile-up (31 pts); ureteral pile-up complicated by fever and colics (9 pts); ureteral obstructing fragments (2 pts); double J obstruction by stone dust (3 pts); persistent ureteral pile-up around double J (3 pts); anuria in solitary kidney (1 pt). Out of the patients who underwent EPCN before SWL 13% were stone free and without drainage at discharge, 77% had passable stone fragments at discharge and drainage has been taken out at 15-30 days check up, 10% had unbroken stone and underwent with drainage to ureterolithotripsy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Ureteritis]. [Structure, physiology and physiopathology of the ureter]. [Ureteral malformations in the adult]. [Ureteritis]. [Primary ureteral neoplasia].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1