从密度计算干雪介电常数:一个重要的回顾

F. Di Paolo, B. Cosciotti, S. Lauro, E. Mattei, E. Pettinelli
{"title":"从密度计算干雪介电常数:一个重要的回顾","authors":"F. Di Paolo, B. Cosciotti, S. Lauro, E. Mattei, E. Pettinelli","doi":"10.1109/ICGPR.2018.8441610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) surveys on alpine snow enable a rapid evaluation of snow thickness but necessitate a measurement of the wave velocity in the snowpack. Such quantity is often evaluated from density measurements, using the relationships connecting snow permittivity and density present in literature. Unfortunately such equations provide different results and are rarely reported with an associated uncertainty, making the choice between different models pretty difficult. In the present work we compare all the equations with uncertainties (when reported), suggesting which model can be considered as the most reliable in the extraction of the wave velocity from snow density measurements. Such choice has also been corroborated by the analysis of experimental data.","PeriodicalId":269482,"journal":{"name":"2018 17th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dry snow permittivity evaluation from density: A critical review\",\"authors\":\"F. Di Paolo, B. Cosciotti, S. Lauro, E. Mattei, E. Pettinelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICGPR.2018.8441610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) surveys on alpine snow enable a rapid evaluation of snow thickness but necessitate a measurement of the wave velocity in the snowpack. Such quantity is often evaluated from density measurements, using the relationships connecting snow permittivity and density present in literature. Unfortunately such equations provide different results and are rarely reported with an associated uncertainty, making the choice between different models pretty difficult. In the present work we compare all the equations with uncertainties (when reported), suggesting which model can be considered as the most reliable in the extraction of the wave velocity from snow density measurements. Such choice has also been corroborated by the analysis of experimental data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 17th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 17th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGPR.2018.8441610\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 17th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGPR.2018.8441610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

探地雷达(GPR)对高山积雪的调查能够快速评估积雪厚度,但需要测量积雪中的波速。这种量通常通过密度测量来评估,使用文献中存在的雪介电常数和密度之间的关系。不幸的是,这些方程提供了不同的结果,并且很少有与不确定性相关的报道,这使得在不同模型之间进行选择非常困难。在目前的工作中,我们比较了所有不确定的方程(当报告时),建议哪个模型在从雪密度测量中提取波速时可以被认为是最可靠的。实验数据的分析也证实了这种选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dry snow permittivity evaluation from density: A critical review
Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) surveys on alpine snow enable a rapid evaluation of snow thickness but necessitate a measurement of the wave velocity in the snowpack. Such quantity is often evaluated from density measurements, using the relationships connecting snow permittivity and density present in literature. Unfortunately such equations provide different results and are rarely reported with an associated uncertainty, making the choice between different models pretty difficult. In the present work we compare all the equations with uncertainties (when reported), suggesting which model can be considered as the most reliable in the extraction of the wave velocity from snow density measurements. Such choice has also been corroborated by the analysis of experimental data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A high-stability dual-chip GPR for cooperative target probing Ice volume estimates of Swiss glaciers using helicopter-borne GPR — an example from the Glacier de la Plaine Morte Detection of Top Coal by Conductively-Guided Borehole Radar Waves: Results from Numerical Modelling Investigating karst cave sediments of unroofed caves with GPR, XRF and XRD Comparison of GPR and Capacitance Probe laboratory experiments in sandy soils
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1