当前的建筑实践是否适用于医疗器械的安全方面?探索性调查

Fabio Leite, P. Antonino, Paulo Barbosa, S. Kemmann, Raphael Mendonca
{"title":"当前的建筑实践是否适用于医疗器械的安全方面?探索性调查","authors":"Fabio Leite, P. Antonino, Paulo Barbosa, S. Kemmann, Raphael Mendonca","doi":"10.1109/HealthCom.2014.7001889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have investigated approaches in the literature to assess the quality of the software architectures of medical devices, and have found evidence that there is a lack of methodologies for evaluating the software architecture design aspects of medical devices that might affect system safety. Such evidences were identified when evaluating the software architecture of the FDA Generic Infusion Pump searching for architectural evaluation approaches available in the literature. In order to fill this gap, we propose a set of quality questions that focus on analyzing software architecture design aspects of medical devices aiming safety. We show arguments on why reference projects such as the FDA Generic Infusion Pump system must satisfy our new quality questions. The quality questions were integrated into a quality model commissioned by the Brazilian Health Ministery for the certification of medical devices.","PeriodicalId":269964,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 16th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are the current architectural practices suitable for safety aspects of medical devices? An exploratory investigation\",\"authors\":\"Fabio Leite, P. Antonino, Paulo Barbosa, S. Kemmann, Raphael Mendonca\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HealthCom.2014.7001889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We have investigated approaches in the literature to assess the quality of the software architectures of medical devices, and have found evidence that there is a lack of methodologies for evaluating the software architecture design aspects of medical devices that might affect system safety. Such evidences were identified when evaluating the software architecture of the FDA Generic Infusion Pump searching for architectural evaluation approaches available in the literature. In order to fill this gap, we propose a set of quality questions that focus on analyzing software architecture design aspects of medical devices aiming safety. We show arguments on why reference projects such as the FDA Generic Infusion Pump system must satisfy our new quality questions. The quality questions were integrated into a quality model commissioned by the Brazilian Health Ministery for the certification of medical devices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE 16th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE 16th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HealthCom.2014.7001889\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE 16th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HealthCom.2014.7001889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

我们调查了文献中评估医疗设备软件架构质量的方法,并发现证据表明,缺乏评估可能影响系统安全的医疗设备软件架构设计方面的方法。这些证据是在评估FDA通用输液泵的软件架构时发现的,并在文献中寻找可用的架构评估方法。为了填补这一空白,我们提出了一组质量问题,重点分析医疗设备的软件架构设计方面的安全性。我们展示了为什么参考项目,如FDA通用输液泵系统必须满足我们新的质量问题的争论。质量问题已纳入巴西卫生部委托的医疗器械认证质量模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are the current architectural practices suitable for safety aspects of medical devices? An exploratory investigation
We have investigated approaches in the literature to assess the quality of the software architectures of medical devices, and have found evidence that there is a lack of methodologies for evaluating the software architecture design aspects of medical devices that might affect system safety. Such evidences were identified when evaluating the software architecture of the FDA Generic Infusion Pump searching for architectural evaluation approaches available in the literature. In order to fill this gap, we propose a set of quality questions that focus on analyzing software architecture design aspects of medical devices aiming safety. We show arguments on why reference projects such as the FDA Generic Infusion Pump system must satisfy our new quality questions. The quality questions were integrated into a quality model commissioned by the Brazilian Health Ministery for the certification of medical devices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using online social media platforms for ubiquitous, personal health monitoring Standard-based and distributed health information sharing for mHealth IoT systems Towards health exercise behavior change for teams using life-logging An integrated approach of diet and exercise recommendations for diabetes patients Low complex, programmable FPGA based 8-channel ultrasound transmitter for medical imaging researches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1