在混合式学习环境中练习苏格拉底式提问:促进批判性思维的创新策略

Zahra Shahsavar
{"title":"在混合式学习环境中练习苏格拉底式提问:促进批判性思维的创新策略","authors":"Zahra Shahsavar","doi":"10.1504/IJSMILE.2013.053597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine if practicing Socratic questioning (SQ) can promote students’ critical thinking (CT). Participants were an intact class of undergraduate students enrolled in a course blog. To expand students’ understanding of using thoughtful questions, the researcher used a systematic step-by-step process to teach SQ in a blended learning environment. The main purpose of face-to-face sessions was to prepare students to practice Socratic discussions on the blog. The study employs a mixed-method design to integrate qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis. Students’ questions in four Socratic discussions were collected and coded by using a content analysis approach. The Cornell Critical Thinking Test Level X (CCTT-X) was applied to assess students’ CT ability. The results indicate that practicing SQ in a blended learning environment was significantly effective in fostering students’ CT.","PeriodicalId":275398,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Soc. Media Interact. Learn. Environ.","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practicing Socratic questioning in a blended learning environment: an innovative strategy to promote critical thinking\",\"authors\":\"Zahra Shahsavar\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJSMILE.2013.053597\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to determine if practicing Socratic questioning (SQ) can promote students’ critical thinking (CT). Participants were an intact class of undergraduate students enrolled in a course blog. To expand students’ understanding of using thoughtful questions, the researcher used a systematic step-by-step process to teach SQ in a blended learning environment. The main purpose of face-to-face sessions was to prepare students to practice Socratic discussions on the blog. The study employs a mixed-method design to integrate qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis. Students’ questions in four Socratic discussions were collected and coded by using a content analysis approach. The Cornell Critical Thinking Test Level X (CCTT-X) was applied to assess students’ CT ability. The results indicate that practicing SQ in a blended learning environment was significantly effective in fostering students’ CT.\",\"PeriodicalId\":275398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Soc. Media Interact. Learn. Environ.\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Soc. Media Interact. Learn. Environ.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMILE.2013.053597\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Soc. Media Interact. Learn. Environ.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMILE.2013.053597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本研究旨在探讨练习苏格拉底式提问是否能促进学生的批判性思维。参与者是一个完整的本科班级,他们注册了一个课程博客。为了扩大学生对使用深思熟虑的问题的理解,研究人员在混合学习环境中使用了系统的一步一步的过程来教授SQ。面对面课程的主要目的是让学生准备在博客上练习苏格拉底式的讨论。本研究采用混合方法设计,将定性和定量数据收集和分析相结合。采用内容分析方法,收集学生在四次苏格拉底式讨论中的问题并进行编码。采用康奈尔批判性思维测试X级(CCTT-X)评估学生的批判性思维能力。结果表明,在混合式学习环境中进行心理素质训练对培养学生的心理素质有显著的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Practicing Socratic questioning in a blended learning environment: an innovative strategy to promote critical thinking
This study aims to determine if practicing Socratic questioning (SQ) can promote students’ critical thinking (CT). Participants were an intact class of undergraduate students enrolled in a course blog. To expand students’ understanding of using thoughtful questions, the researcher used a systematic step-by-step process to teach SQ in a blended learning environment. The main purpose of face-to-face sessions was to prepare students to practice Socratic discussions on the blog. The study employs a mixed-method design to integrate qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis. Students’ questions in four Socratic discussions were collected and coded by using a content analysis approach. The Cornell Critical Thinking Test Level X (CCTT-X) was applied to assess students’ CT ability. The results indicate that practicing SQ in a blended learning environment was significantly effective in fostering students’ CT.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How to change the world: the relationship between social media and social change in the classroom Learning ecologies in online language learning social networks: a netnographic study of EFL learners using italki Most versus least used social media: undergraduate students' preferences, participation, lurking, and motivational factors Star Wars science on social media! Using pop culture to improve STEM skills Applying a modified technology acceptance model to qualitatively analyse the factors affecting microblogging integration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1