了解澳大利亚悉尼看护者的角色和挑战:一项基于人群的相关队列研究

Ben Harris-Roxas, A. Kabir, M. Barr
{"title":"了解澳大利亚悉尼看护者的角色和挑战:一项基于人群的相关队列研究","authors":"Ben Harris-Roxas, A. Kabir, M. Barr","doi":"10.1370/afm.20.s1.3103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Caregiver comprise a significant portion of the Australian community. In 2015, almost 2.7 million Australians were identified as caregivers, and almost one-third (31.7%) of this group were identified as primary carers. Objective: To investigate the impact of being a caregiver on a person’s health and wellbeing compared to non-caregivers. Study Design: A record linkage study using questionnaire data linked with eight datasets. Dataset: 45 and Up Study, Medicare Benefit Scheme claims, hospitalizations and deaths datasets. Population Studied: 29,489 people in Central and Eastern Sydney aged over 45 were followed over an eight year period. Instrument: Analysis of caregivers and non-caregivers were described and compared. Characteristics of carers who were coping well compared to those who were not, using quality of life as the indicator, were also analysed. Outcome Measures: primary care use, hospitalizations and mortality. Results: Compared with non-caregivers, caregivers in CES were more likely to be: female, married, speak a language other than English, current smoker, engaging in adequate physical activity, have ever had anxiety, psychological distress, heart disease, self-rated poor quality of life and less likely to be older, have higher incomes, and need help with daily activities. Caregivers had higher rates of primary care use than non-caregivers [Adj. HR (95% CI): 1.21(1.13, 1.30)]. However, hospital admissions and mortality were not significantly different. Compared with caregivers who were not coping well, caregivers who were coping well, once adjusted for all of the other covariates, were more likely to self-report good quality of health, and less likely to have high psychological distress. Caregivers who were coping well were 24% less likely to be high primary care users [Adj","PeriodicalId":247815,"journal":{"name":"Population health and epidemiology","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the caregiver role and challenges in Sydney, Australia: A population based linked cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Ben Harris-Roxas, A. Kabir, M. Barr\",\"doi\":\"10.1370/afm.20.s1.3103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Context: Caregiver comprise a significant portion of the Australian community. In 2015, almost 2.7 million Australians were identified as caregivers, and almost one-third (31.7%) of this group were identified as primary carers. Objective: To investigate the impact of being a caregiver on a person’s health and wellbeing compared to non-caregivers. Study Design: A record linkage study using questionnaire data linked with eight datasets. Dataset: 45 and Up Study, Medicare Benefit Scheme claims, hospitalizations and deaths datasets. Population Studied: 29,489 people in Central and Eastern Sydney aged over 45 were followed over an eight year period. Instrument: Analysis of caregivers and non-caregivers were described and compared. Characteristics of carers who were coping well compared to those who were not, using quality of life as the indicator, were also analysed. Outcome Measures: primary care use, hospitalizations and mortality. Results: Compared with non-caregivers, caregivers in CES were more likely to be: female, married, speak a language other than English, current smoker, engaging in adequate physical activity, have ever had anxiety, psychological distress, heart disease, self-rated poor quality of life and less likely to be older, have higher incomes, and need help with daily activities. Caregivers had higher rates of primary care use than non-caregivers [Adj. HR (95% CI): 1.21(1.13, 1.30)]. However, hospital admissions and mortality were not significantly different. Compared with caregivers who were not coping well, caregivers who were coping well, once adjusted for all of the other covariates, were more likely to self-report good quality of health, and less likely to have high psychological distress. Caregivers who were coping well were 24% less likely to be high primary care users [Adj\",\"PeriodicalId\":247815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Population health and epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Population health and epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.20.s1.3103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population health and epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.20.s1.3103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:护理人员构成了澳大利亚社区的重要组成部分。2015年,近270万澳大利亚人被确定为照顾者,其中近三分之一(31.7%)的人被确定为主要照顾者。目的:调查与非照顾者相比,照顾者对一个人的健康和幸福的影响。研究设计:一项记录关联研究,使用与八个数据集相关的问卷数据。数据集:45岁及以上研究,医疗保险福利计划索赔,住院和死亡数据集。人口研究:对悉尼中部和东部年龄在45岁以上的29,489人进行了为期8年的跟踪调查。分析方法:对护理人员和非护理人员进行描述和比较。研究人员还以生活质量为指标,分析了处理得好的护理人员与处理不好的护理人员的特征。结果测量:初级保健使用、住院和死亡率。结果:与非照顾者相比,CES中的照顾者更有可能是:女性,已婚,会说英语以外的语言,目前吸烟,从事适当的体育活动,曾经有过焦虑,心理困扰,心脏病,自评生活质量差,年龄较小,收入较高,并且需要日常活动帮助。护理人员使用初级保健的比例高于非护理人员[j. HR (95% CI): 1.21(1.13, 1.30)]。然而,住院率和死亡率没有显著差异。与应对不好的照顾者相比,一旦调整了所有其他协变量,应对良好的照顾者更有可能自我报告良好的健康质量,而不太可能有高度的心理困扰。应对良好的护理人员成为初级保健高使用者的可能性要低24%
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding the caregiver role and challenges in Sydney, Australia: A population based linked cohort study
Context: Caregiver comprise a significant portion of the Australian community. In 2015, almost 2.7 million Australians were identified as caregivers, and almost one-third (31.7%) of this group were identified as primary carers. Objective: To investigate the impact of being a caregiver on a person’s health and wellbeing compared to non-caregivers. Study Design: A record linkage study using questionnaire data linked with eight datasets. Dataset: 45 and Up Study, Medicare Benefit Scheme claims, hospitalizations and deaths datasets. Population Studied: 29,489 people in Central and Eastern Sydney aged over 45 were followed over an eight year period. Instrument: Analysis of caregivers and non-caregivers were described and compared. Characteristics of carers who were coping well compared to those who were not, using quality of life as the indicator, were also analysed. Outcome Measures: primary care use, hospitalizations and mortality. Results: Compared with non-caregivers, caregivers in CES were more likely to be: female, married, speak a language other than English, current smoker, engaging in adequate physical activity, have ever had anxiety, psychological distress, heart disease, self-rated poor quality of life and less likely to be older, have higher incomes, and need help with daily activities. Caregivers had higher rates of primary care use than non-caregivers [Adj. HR (95% CI): 1.21(1.13, 1.30)]. However, hospital admissions and mortality were not significantly different. Compared with caregivers who were not coping well, caregivers who were coping well, once adjusted for all of the other covariates, were more likely to self-report good quality of health, and less likely to have high psychological distress. Caregivers who were coping well were 24% less likely to be high primary care users [Adj
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Primary Care Data Reports in Ontario, Canada: Comparing primary care attachment rates from 2020 to 2022 Exploring Primary Care Utilization and Emergency Department Visits Using the Virginia All-Payer Claims Database (APCD) Weathering the Seasons: Understanding the Impact on Hospital Readmissions Quality of Life of Men Five-Year after Diagnosis with Low-risk Prostate Cancer in a Population-based Sample Medical vs. Recreational Marijuana in Patients with Non-cancer Pain and Long-term Prescription Opioid Use
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1