Bruno Costa, Paulo F. Pires, Flávia Coimbra Delicato, P. Merson
{"title":"评估具象状态转移(REST)体系结构:REST在我的体系结构中的影响是什么?","authors":"Bruno Costa, Paulo F. Pires, Flávia Coimbra Delicato, P. Merson","doi":"10.1109/WICSA.2014.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of Representational State Transfer (REST) as an architectural style for integrating services and applications brings several benefits, but also poses new challenges and risks. Particularly important among those risks are failures to effectively address quality attribute requirements such as security, reliability, and performance. An architecture evaluation early in the software life cycle can identify and help mitigate those risks. In this paper we present guidelines to assist architecture evaluation activities in REST-based systems. These guidelines can be systematically used in conjunction with scenario-based evaluation methods to reason about design considerations and trade-offs. This paper also presents a proof of concept to describe how to use the guidelines in the context of an Architecture Trade-off Analysis Method (ATAM) evaluation.","PeriodicalId":346971,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating a Representational State Transfer (REST) Architecture: What is the Impact of REST in My Architecture?\",\"authors\":\"Bruno Costa, Paulo F. Pires, Flávia Coimbra Delicato, P. Merson\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WICSA.2014.29\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of Representational State Transfer (REST) as an architectural style for integrating services and applications brings several benefits, but also poses new challenges and risks. Particularly important among those risks are failures to effectively address quality attribute requirements such as security, reliability, and performance. An architecture evaluation early in the software life cycle can identify and help mitigate those risks. In this paper we present guidelines to assist architecture evaluation activities in REST-based systems. These guidelines can be systematically used in conjunction with scenario-based evaluation methods to reason about design considerations and trade-offs. This paper also presents a proof of concept to describe how to use the guidelines in the context of an Architecture Trade-off Analysis Method (ATAM) evaluation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WICSA.2014.29\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WICSA.2014.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25
摘要
使用具象状态传输(Representational State Transfer, REST)作为集成服务和应用程序的架构风格带来了一些好处,但也带来了新的挑战和风险。在这些风险中,特别重要的是未能有效地处理质量属性需求,如安全性、可靠性和性能。在软件生命周期的早期进行架构评估可以识别并帮助减轻这些风险。在本文中,我们提出了指导方针,以帮助基于rest的系统中的体系结构评估活动。这些指导方针可以系统地与基于场景的评估方法结合使用,以对设计考虑和权衡进行推理。本文还提供了一个概念证明,以描述如何在架构权衡分析方法(ATAM)评估的上下文中使用指南。
Evaluating a Representational State Transfer (REST) Architecture: What is the Impact of REST in My Architecture?
The use of Representational State Transfer (REST) as an architectural style for integrating services and applications brings several benefits, but also poses new challenges and risks. Particularly important among those risks are failures to effectively address quality attribute requirements such as security, reliability, and performance. An architecture evaluation early in the software life cycle can identify and help mitigate those risks. In this paper we present guidelines to assist architecture evaluation activities in REST-based systems. These guidelines can be systematically used in conjunction with scenario-based evaluation methods to reason about design considerations and trade-offs. This paper also presents a proof of concept to describe how to use the guidelines in the context of an Architecture Trade-off Analysis Method (ATAM) evaluation.