公司和政府债券基金:投资风格、绩效和现金流分析

George Comer, Javier Rodríguez
{"title":"公司和政府债券基金:投资风格、绩效和现金流分析","authors":"George Comer, Javier Rodríguez","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.929490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine four separate classifications (high quality corporate, general corporate, government Treasury, and general government) of investment grade bond funds over the 1994-2004 period. We verify that distinct differences exist in investment styles across the classifications. We also document significant differences in performance as corporate funds outperform government funds on a risk adjusted basis. The performance results are robust to alternative evaluation metrics. An examination of cash flows to the funds indicates that bond fund investors are aware of the performance difference and have directed their investment dollars accordingly.","PeriodicalId":322512,"journal":{"name":"Georgetown University McDonough School of Business Research Paper Series","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corporate and Government Bond Funds: An Analysis of Investment Style, Performance, and Cash Flows\",\"authors\":\"George Comer, Javier Rodríguez\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.929490\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We examine four separate classifications (high quality corporate, general corporate, government Treasury, and general government) of investment grade bond funds over the 1994-2004 period. We verify that distinct differences exist in investment styles across the classifications. We also document significant differences in performance as corporate funds outperform government funds on a risk adjusted basis. The performance results are robust to alternative evaluation metrics. An examination of cash flows to the funds indicates that bond fund investors are aware of the performance difference and have directed their investment dollars accordingly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":322512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Georgetown University McDonough School of Business Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Georgetown University McDonough School of Business Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.929490\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Georgetown University McDonough School of Business Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.929490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

我们研究了1994-2004年期间投资级债券基金的四个独立类别(高质量公司、一般公司、政府财政部和一般政府)。我们验证了不同类别的投资风格存在明显差异。我们还记录了公司基金在风险调整基础上优于政府基金的显著表现差异。性能结果对其他评估指标具有鲁棒性。对基金现金流量的检查表明,债券基金投资者意识到业绩差异,并相应地指导他们的投资资金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Corporate and Government Bond Funds: An Analysis of Investment Style, Performance, and Cash Flows
We examine four separate classifications (high quality corporate, general corporate, government Treasury, and general government) of investment grade bond funds over the 1994-2004 period. We verify that distinct differences exist in investment styles across the classifications. We also document significant differences in performance as corporate funds outperform government funds on a risk adjusted basis. The performance results are robust to alternative evaluation metrics. An examination of cash flows to the funds indicates that bond fund investors are aware of the performance difference and have directed their investment dollars accordingly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Evolution of Judicial Standards: Evidence from Litigated Merger Trials Labor Force Telework Flexibility and Asset Prices: Evidence from the COVID-19 Pandemic The Pricing of New Corporate Debt Issues Do the Rich Gamble in the Stock Market? Low Risk Anomalies and Wealthy Households Design of Electricity Demand-Response Programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1