在防御规划中确定最佳联合火力的量化风险

M. Fang
{"title":"在防御规划中确定最佳联合火力的量化风险","authors":"M. Fang","doi":"10.1109/WARTIA.2014.6976179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the first step for a NATO System Analysis Study task on Methods to Support Decision Making in Joint Fires, this paper identifies the critical element of this task and develops a method for quantifying the risk of Collateral Damage. As a supplement to the current NATO Collateral Damage Estimation, this quantification methodology recognizes that the risk of Collateral Damage may vary with usage of different weapon and ammunition combinations even though the target is the same. Therefore, the weapon and ammunition characteristic properties were considered for this Collateral Damage quantification. This risk quantification methodology will help inform decision making on selecting optimal Joint Fires in Defence Planning.","PeriodicalId":288854,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Research and Technology in Industry Applications (WARTIA)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying risk for determining optimal joint fires in defence planning\",\"authors\":\"M. Fang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WARTIA.2014.6976179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As the first step for a NATO System Analysis Study task on Methods to Support Decision Making in Joint Fires, this paper identifies the critical element of this task and develops a method for quantifying the risk of Collateral Damage. As a supplement to the current NATO Collateral Damage Estimation, this quantification methodology recognizes that the risk of Collateral Damage may vary with usage of different weapon and ammunition combinations even though the target is the same. Therefore, the weapon and ammunition characteristic properties were considered for this Collateral Damage quantification. This risk quantification methodology will help inform decision making on selecting optimal Joint Fires in Defence Planning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":288854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Research and Technology in Industry Applications (WARTIA)\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Research and Technology in Industry Applications (WARTIA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WARTIA.2014.6976179\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Research and Technology in Industry Applications (WARTIA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WARTIA.2014.6976179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为北约联合火力支持决策方法系统分析研究任务的第一步,本文确定了该任务的关键要素,并开发了一种量化附带损害风险的方法。作为当前北约附带损害评估的补充,这种量化方法认识到附带损害的风险可能随着使用不同的武器和弹药组合而变化,即使目标是相同的。因此,在对附带伤害进行量化时,需要考虑武器弹药的特性。这种风险量化方法将有助于为防务规划中选择最佳联合火力的决策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quantifying risk for determining optimal joint fires in defence planning
As the first step for a NATO System Analysis Study task on Methods to Support Decision Making in Joint Fires, this paper identifies the critical element of this task and develops a method for quantifying the risk of Collateral Damage. As a supplement to the current NATO Collateral Damage Estimation, this quantification methodology recognizes that the risk of Collateral Damage may vary with usage of different weapon and ammunition combinations even though the target is the same. Therefore, the weapon and ammunition characteristic properties were considered for this Collateral Damage quantification. This risk quantification methodology will help inform decision making on selecting optimal Joint Fires in Defence Planning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hospital digital library based on cloud computing Design and actualization of management system in sports teaching A topology control algorithm for ribbon wireless sensor network From the user experience to optimization design in App development process Research on communication network architecture of energy internet based on SDN
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1