有学习障碍的成人关系中依恋生活经验的系统回顾

Rowan Hevesi, K. Theodore
{"title":"有学习障碍的成人关系中依恋生活经验的系统回顾","authors":"Rowan Hevesi, K. Theodore","doi":"10.53841/bpsfpid.2022.20.3.64","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research has shown that people with learning disabilities are vulnerable to attachment difficulties, have smaller networks, and experience high levels of isolation and marginalisation. The need for a review gaining people’s subjective perspectives was indicated to offer insight into the lived experience of how attachment develops and what challenges are faced. Objectives: This paper aimed to systematically review and synthesise qualitative studies exploring people with learning disabilities’ experiences of attachment in relationships. Methods: Three databases were accessed to retrieve articles by using relevant search terms. Thematic synthesis was conducted to synthesis the findings across 25 papers using Thomas and Harden’s (2008) three-stage method. Results: In total, 25 studies met the inclusion criteria, with data from 456 people with learning disabilities, with a diverse range of background and levels of functioning. All the studies were classified as moderate to high quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP, 2018) criteria. Thematic synthesis generated four themes: (1) ‘I feel safe’: Attachment safety and significance of relationships (2) Challenges and constraints to attachment, (3) Experiencing loss of attachment and (4) Hopes and desires of attachments within relationships. Conclusions: The findings indicate how caregivers and services could use trauma-informed and attachment-focused approaches. Further research on adult attachment representations is required to build the evidence-base for adults with learning disabilities.","PeriodicalId":302131,"journal":{"name":"FPID Bulletin: The Bulletin of the Faculty for People with Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of the lived experiences of attachment in relationships for adults with learning disabilities\",\"authors\":\"Rowan Hevesi, K. Theodore\",\"doi\":\"10.53841/bpsfpid.2022.20.3.64\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Research has shown that people with learning disabilities are vulnerable to attachment difficulties, have smaller networks, and experience high levels of isolation and marginalisation. The need for a review gaining people’s subjective perspectives was indicated to offer insight into the lived experience of how attachment develops and what challenges are faced. Objectives: This paper aimed to systematically review and synthesise qualitative studies exploring people with learning disabilities’ experiences of attachment in relationships. Methods: Three databases were accessed to retrieve articles by using relevant search terms. Thematic synthesis was conducted to synthesis the findings across 25 papers using Thomas and Harden’s (2008) three-stage method. Results: In total, 25 studies met the inclusion criteria, with data from 456 people with learning disabilities, with a diverse range of background and levels of functioning. All the studies were classified as moderate to high quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP, 2018) criteria. Thematic synthesis generated four themes: (1) ‘I feel safe’: Attachment safety and significance of relationships (2) Challenges and constraints to attachment, (3) Experiencing loss of attachment and (4) Hopes and desires of attachments within relationships. Conclusions: The findings indicate how caregivers and services could use trauma-informed and attachment-focused approaches. Further research on adult attachment representations is required to build the evidence-base for adults with learning disabilities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":302131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FPID Bulletin: The Bulletin of the Faculty for People with Intellectual Disabilities\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FPID Bulletin: The Bulletin of the Faculty for People with Intellectual Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsfpid.2022.20.3.64\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FPID Bulletin: The Bulletin of the Faculty for People with Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsfpid.2022.20.3.64","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究表明,有学习障碍的人容易出现依恋困难,拥有较小的网络,并经历高度的孤立和边缘化。研究人员指出,需要进行一项评估,以获得人们的主观观点,从而深入了解依恋是如何发展的,以及面临哪些挑战。目的:本研究旨在系统地回顾和综合探讨学习障碍人士在人际关系中的依恋体验的定性研究。方法:使用相关检索词对三个数据库进行检索。使用Thomas和Harden(2008)的三阶段方法进行主题综合,以综合25篇论文的发现。结果:总共有25项研究符合纳入标准,数据来自456名学习障碍患者,他们的背景和功能水平各不相同。使用关键评估技能计划(CASP, 2018)标准,所有研究都被归类为中等至高质量。主题综合产生了四个主题:(1)“我感到安全”:依恋安全和关系的重要性;(2)对依恋的挑战和约束;(3)经历依恋的丧失;(4)在关系中对依恋的希望和渴望。结论:研究结果表明,护理人员和服务人员如何使用创伤知情和依恋为重点的方法。成人依恋表征需要进一步的研究来建立成人学习障碍的证据基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A systematic review of the lived experiences of attachment in relationships for adults with learning disabilities
Research has shown that people with learning disabilities are vulnerable to attachment difficulties, have smaller networks, and experience high levels of isolation and marginalisation. The need for a review gaining people’s subjective perspectives was indicated to offer insight into the lived experience of how attachment develops and what challenges are faced. Objectives: This paper aimed to systematically review and synthesise qualitative studies exploring people with learning disabilities’ experiences of attachment in relationships. Methods: Three databases were accessed to retrieve articles by using relevant search terms. Thematic synthesis was conducted to synthesis the findings across 25 papers using Thomas and Harden’s (2008) three-stage method. Results: In total, 25 studies met the inclusion criteria, with data from 456 people with learning disabilities, with a diverse range of background and levels of functioning. All the studies were classified as moderate to high quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP, 2018) criteria. Thematic synthesis generated four themes: (1) ‘I feel safe’: Attachment safety and significance of relationships (2) Challenges and constraints to attachment, (3) Experiencing loss of attachment and (4) Hopes and desires of attachments within relationships. Conclusions: The findings indicate how caregivers and services could use trauma-informed and attachment-focused approaches. Further research on adult attachment representations is required to build the evidence-base for adults with learning disabilities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of the revised Neuropsychological Assessment of Dementia in Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities (NAID-R) What are the experiences of people with learning disabilities, and their support workers, when negotiating access to opportunities for developing relationships and intimacy? Staff wellbeing interventions and its impact on levels of physical intervention in an inpatient unit for individuals with a learning disability: A feasibility study Empirical Project: Investigating the onset and trajectory of Alzheimer’s disease in Down syndrome Does psychological distress impact Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale performance in adults with intellectual disabilities? A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1