Joffrey Decourselle, F. Duchateau, Trond Aalberg, Naimdjon Takhirov, Nicolas Lumineau
{"title":"用于评估书目记录解释的开放数据集","authors":"Joffrey Decourselle, F. Duchateau, Trond Aalberg, Naimdjon Takhirov, Nicolas Lumineau","doi":"10.1145/2910896.2925457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The transformation of legacy MARC catalogs to FRBR catalogs (FRBRization) is a complex and important challenge for libraries. Although many FRBRization tools have provided experimental validation, it is difficult to evaluate and compare these systems on a fair basis due to a lack of common datasets. This poster presents two public datasets (T42 and BIB-RCAT) intended to support the validation of the FRBRization process.","PeriodicalId":109613,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open datasets for evaluating the interpretation of bibliographic records\",\"authors\":\"Joffrey Decourselle, F. Duchateau, Trond Aalberg, Naimdjon Takhirov, Nicolas Lumineau\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2910896.2925457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The transformation of legacy MARC catalogs to FRBR catalogs (FRBRization) is a complex and important challenge for libraries. Although many FRBRization tools have provided experimental validation, it is difficult to evaluate and compare these systems on a fair basis due to a lack of common datasets. This poster presents two public datasets (T42 and BIB-RCAT) intended to support the validation of the FRBRization process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":109613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL)\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2910896.2925457\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2910896.2925457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Open datasets for evaluating the interpretation of bibliographic records
The transformation of legacy MARC catalogs to FRBR catalogs (FRBRization) is a complex and important challenge for libraries. Although many FRBRization tools have provided experimental validation, it is difficult to evaluate and compare these systems on a fair basis due to a lack of common datasets. This poster presents two public datasets (T42 and BIB-RCAT) intended to support the validation of the FRBRization process.