{"title":"欧共体香蕉争端与关贸总协定/世贸组织","authors":"Norio Komuro","doi":"10.5135/EUSJ1997.2000.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The notorious banana saga has been dealt with on three levels : the GATT/WTO, the EC Court of Justice(\"ECJ\")and EC Member States' courts. These different f ora did not render convergent decisions, but rather complicated the matter further. Clearly, the EC banana regime favoured EC and ACP bananas to the detriment of third-country bananas. GATT/ WTO panels supported arguments by non-ACP parties and found the banana regime to be inconsistent with EC's obligations under GATT/WTO nondiscrimination rules. However, the ECJ has rejected legal challenges against the EC regime, thus giving rise to conflicts with GATT /WTO findings and national courts. This paper reviews the banana dispute before the GATT/WTO, the ECJ and national courts to compare each judicial control over the EC trade","PeriodicalId":299812,"journal":{"name":"EU Studies in Japan","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EC Banana Dispute and the GATT/WTO\",\"authors\":\"Norio Komuro\",\"doi\":\"10.5135/EUSJ1997.2000.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The notorious banana saga has been dealt with on three levels : the GATT/WTO, the EC Court of Justice(\\\"ECJ\\\")and EC Member States' courts. These different f ora did not render convergent decisions, but rather complicated the matter further. Clearly, the EC banana regime favoured EC and ACP bananas to the detriment of third-country bananas. GATT/ WTO panels supported arguments by non-ACP parties and found the banana regime to be inconsistent with EC's obligations under GATT/WTO nondiscrimination rules. However, the ECJ has rejected legal challenges against the EC regime, thus giving rise to conflicts with GATT /WTO findings and national courts. This paper reviews the banana dispute before the GATT/WTO, the ECJ and national courts to compare each judicial control over the EC trade\",\"PeriodicalId\":299812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EU Studies in Japan\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EU Studies in Japan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5135/EUSJ1997.2000.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EU Studies in Japan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5135/EUSJ1997.2000.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The notorious banana saga has been dealt with on three levels : the GATT/WTO, the EC Court of Justice("ECJ")and EC Member States' courts. These different f ora did not render convergent decisions, but rather complicated the matter further. Clearly, the EC banana regime favoured EC and ACP bananas to the detriment of third-country bananas. GATT/ WTO panels supported arguments by non-ACP parties and found the banana regime to be inconsistent with EC's obligations under GATT/WTO nondiscrimination rules. However, the ECJ has rejected legal challenges against the EC regime, thus giving rise to conflicts with GATT /WTO findings and national courts. This paper reviews the banana dispute before the GATT/WTO, the ECJ and national courts to compare each judicial control over the EC trade