提高数据中心现货市场收益、效率和可靠性:一种真实的机制

Kai Song, Y. Yao, L. Golubchik
{"title":"提高数据中心现货市场收益、效率和可靠性:一种真实的机制","authors":"Kai Song, Y. Yao, L. Golubchik","doi":"10.1109/MASCOTS.2013.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data centers are typically over-provisioned, in order to meet certain service level agreements (SLAs) under worst-case scenarios (e.g., peak loads). Selling unused instances at discounted prices thus is a reasonable approach for data center providers to off-set the maintenance and operation costs. Spot market models are widely used for pricing and allocating unused instances. In this paper, we focus on mechanism design for a data center spot market (DCSM). Particularly, we propose a mechanism based on a repeated uniform price auction, and prove its truthfulness. In the mechanism, to achieve better quality of service, the flexibility of adjusting bids during job execution is provided, and a bidding adjustment model is also discussed. Four metrics are used to evaluate the mechanism: in addition to the commonly used metrics in auction theory, namely, revenue, efficiency, slowdown and waste are defined to capture the Quality of Service (QoS) provided by DCSMs. We prove that a uniform price action achieves optimal efficiency among all single-price auctions in DCSMs. We also conduct comprehensive simulations to explore the performance of the resulting DCSM. The result show that (1) the bidding adjustment model helps increase the revenue by an average of 5%, and decrease the slowdown and waste by average of 5% and 6%, respectively, (2) our model with repeated uniform price auction outperforms the current Amazon Spot Market by an average of 14% in revenue, 24% in efficiency, 13% in slowdown, and by 14% in waste. Parameter tuning studies are also performed to refine the performance of our mechanism.","PeriodicalId":385538,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE 21st International Symposium on Modelling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the Revenue, Efficiency and Reliability in Data Center Spot Market: A Truthful Mechanism\",\"authors\":\"Kai Song, Y. Yao, L. Golubchik\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MASCOTS.2013.30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Data centers are typically over-provisioned, in order to meet certain service level agreements (SLAs) under worst-case scenarios (e.g., peak loads). Selling unused instances at discounted prices thus is a reasonable approach for data center providers to off-set the maintenance and operation costs. Spot market models are widely used for pricing and allocating unused instances. In this paper, we focus on mechanism design for a data center spot market (DCSM). Particularly, we propose a mechanism based on a repeated uniform price auction, and prove its truthfulness. In the mechanism, to achieve better quality of service, the flexibility of adjusting bids during job execution is provided, and a bidding adjustment model is also discussed. Four metrics are used to evaluate the mechanism: in addition to the commonly used metrics in auction theory, namely, revenue, efficiency, slowdown and waste are defined to capture the Quality of Service (QoS) provided by DCSMs. We prove that a uniform price action achieves optimal efficiency among all single-price auctions in DCSMs. We also conduct comprehensive simulations to explore the performance of the resulting DCSM. The result show that (1) the bidding adjustment model helps increase the revenue by an average of 5%, and decrease the slowdown and waste by average of 5% and 6%, respectively, (2) our model with repeated uniform price auction outperforms the current Amazon Spot Market by an average of 14% in revenue, 24% in efficiency, 13% in slowdown, and by 14% in waste. Parameter tuning studies are also performed to refine the performance of our mechanism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":385538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 IEEE 21st International Symposium on Modelling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 IEEE 21st International Symposium on Modelling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MASCOTS.2013.30\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE 21st International Symposium on Modelling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MASCOTS.2013.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

为了在最坏情况下(例如,峰值负载)满足某些服务水平协议(sla),数据中心通常会过度供应。因此,以折扣价出售未使用的实例是数据中心提供商抵消维护和操作成本的合理方法。现货市场模型被广泛用于定价和分配未使用的实例。本文主要研究数据中心现货市场(DCSM)的机制设计。具体地说,我们提出了一种基于重复统一价格拍卖的机制,并证明了其真实性。在该机制中,为获得更好的服务质量,提供了在工作执行过程中调整投标的灵活性,并讨论了投标调整模型。使用四个指标来评估该机制:除了拍卖理论中常用的指标外,还定义了收入、效率、速度放缓和浪费,以捕获dcsm提供的服务质量(QoS)。我们证明了统一价格行为在dcsm的所有单一价格拍卖中达到了最优的效率。我们还进行了全面的仿真来探索所得的DCSM的性能。结果表明:(1)竞价调整模型使亚马逊现货市场的收益平均增加5%,慢速和浪费平均减少5%和6%;(2)我们的重复统一价格拍卖模型的收益、效率、慢速和浪费分别平均高出当前亚马逊现货市场14%、24%、13%和14%。还进行了参数调优研究,以改进我们的机制的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improving the Revenue, Efficiency and Reliability in Data Center Spot Market: A Truthful Mechanism
Data centers are typically over-provisioned, in order to meet certain service level agreements (SLAs) under worst-case scenarios (e.g., peak loads). Selling unused instances at discounted prices thus is a reasonable approach for data center providers to off-set the maintenance and operation costs. Spot market models are widely used for pricing and allocating unused instances. In this paper, we focus on mechanism design for a data center spot market (DCSM). Particularly, we propose a mechanism based on a repeated uniform price auction, and prove its truthfulness. In the mechanism, to achieve better quality of service, the flexibility of adjusting bids during job execution is provided, and a bidding adjustment model is also discussed. Four metrics are used to evaluate the mechanism: in addition to the commonly used metrics in auction theory, namely, revenue, efficiency, slowdown and waste are defined to capture the Quality of Service (QoS) provided by DCSMs. We prove that a uniform price action achieves optimal efficiency among all single-price auctions in DCSMs. We also conduct comprehensive simulations to explore the performance of the resulting DCSM. The result show that (1) the bidding adjustment model helps increase the revenue by an average of 5%, and decrease the slowdown and waste by average of 5% and 6%, respectively, (2) our model with repeated uniform price auction outperforms the current Amazon Spot Market by an average of 14% in revenue, 24% in efficiency, 13% in slowdown, and by 14% in waste. Parameter tuning studies are also performed to refine the performance of our mechanism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On Modeling Low-Power Wireless Protocols Based on Synchronous Packet Transmissions Analysis of a Simple Approach to Modeling Performance for Streaming Data Applications On the Accuracy of Trace Replay Methods for File System Evaluation A Fix-and-Relax Model for Heterogeneous LTE-Based Networks Making JavaScript Better by Making It Even Slower
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1