变革设计实践:比较工程专业学生面对面和技术中介的设计经验

James J. Pembridge, A. Johri, Christopher B. Williams
{"title":"变革设计实践:比较工程专业学生面对面和技术中介的设计经验","authors":"James J. Pembridge, A. Johri, Christopher B. Williams","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2009.5350623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital technology has become a central element of how students learn and engineers work. This paper presents findings from a naturally occurring quasi-experiment that compares the design experience of two sophomore-level engineering design teams and their use of technology. Both teams met regularly during normal class hours, but outside of class one team exclusively used technology for collaboration whereas the second team met face-to-face. The collection of data occurred over the course of a semester and included in-class and out-of-class video, logs and transcripts of online interaction, and focus groups. Analysis consisted of an iterative examination of the data followed by grounded analysis to identify students' collaborative practices. It was determined that the interaction patterns among the teams lead to designs that were similar in nature but were reached through varying processes. While there were reports of several benefits for collaboration, technology was seen to affect students' thinking and design process. The results from the study shed new light on role technology plays not only in supporting traditional design processes but also in creating novel practices. It highlights the support technology can provide to designers in industry and the classroom.","PeriodicalId":129330,"journal":{"name":"2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transformative design practices: Comparing face-to-face and technology-mediated design experiences among engineering students\",\"authors\":\"James J. Pembridge, A. Johri, Christopher B. Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FIE.2009.5350623\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Digital technology has become a central element of how students learn and engineers work. This paper presents findings from a naturally occurring quasi-experiment that compares the design experience of two sophomore-level engineering design teams and their use of technology. Both teams met regularly during normal class hours, but outside of class one team exclusively used technology for collaboration whereas the second team met face-to-face. The collection of data occurred over the course of a semester and included in-class and out-of-class video, logs and transcripts of online interaction, and focus groups. Analysis consisted of an iterative examination of the data followed by grounded analysis to identify students' collaborative practices. It was determined that the interaction patterns among the teams lead to designs that were similar in nature but were reached through varying processes. While there were reports of several benefits for collaboration, technology was seen to affect students' thinking and design process. The results from the study shed new light on role technology plays not only in supporting traditional design processes but also in creating novel practices. It highlights the support technology can provide to designers in industry and the classroom.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2009.5350623\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2009.5350623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

数字技术已经成为学生学习和工程师工作的核心要素。本文介绍了一个自然发生的准实验的结果,比较了两个二年级工程设计团队的设计经验和他们对技术的使用。两个团队在正常上课时间定期会面,但在课堂之外,一个团队专门使用技术进行协作,而第二个团队则面对面会面。数据收集发生在一个学期的课程中,包括课堂内和课外视频,在线互动的日志和成绩单,以及焦点小组。分析包括对数据的反复检查,然后进行有根据的分析,以确定学生的合作实践。确定了团队之间的交互模式导致了本质上相似的设计,但通过不同的过程实现。虽然有报道称合作有几个好处,但技术被认为会影响学生的思维和设计过程。这项研究的结果揭示了技术不仅在支持传统设计过程中发挥了新的作用,而且在创造新的实践中也发挥了作用。它强调了技术可以为工业和课堂上的设计师提供的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Transformative design practices: Comparing face-to-face and technology-mediated design experiences among engineering students
Digital technology has become a central element of how students learn and engineers work. This paper presents findings from a naturally occurring quasi-experiment that compares the design experience of two sophomore-level engineering design teams and their use of technology. Both teams met regularly during normal class hours, but outside of class one team exclusively used technology for collaboration whereas the second team met face-to-face. The collection of data occurred over the course of a semester and included in-class and out-of-class video, logs and transcripts of online interaction, and focus groups. Analysis consisted of an iterative examination of the data followed by grounded analysis to identify students' collaborative practices. It was determined that the interaction patterns among the teams lead to designs that were similar in nature but were reached through varying processes. While there were reports of several benefits for collaboration, technology was seen to affect students' thinking and design process. The results from the study shed new light on role technology plays not only in supporting traditional design processes but also in creating novel practices. It highlights the support technology can provide to designers in industry and the classroom.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Work in progress - use of a system for evaluation of learning and formative feedback in fluid mechanics Special session - developing engineering student's philosophical inquiry skills The business of Service Learning Work in progress: iComb Project - a mathematical widget for teaching and learning combinatorics through exercises Work in progress - integrating energy issues and technologies into an electrical or computer engineering curriculum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1