{"title":"可行的克隆函数","authors":"C. Boit, Clemens Helfmeier, Dmitry Nedospasov","doi":"10.1145/2517300.2528523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Physically Unclonable Functions (PUF) are continuously being integrated into next generation security products. Nevertheless, their implementations and algorithms are the subject of much debate amongst the security community. One proposed use application for PUFs is replacing secure key storage. Yet the full unique PUF response of the most common type of PUFs can be recovered by using standard failure analysis equipment. SRAM PUFs used as key storage can only be considered to marginally improve security over conventional non-volatile key storage.","PeriodicalId":350304,"journal":{"name":"Workshop on Trustworthy Embedded Devices","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibly clonable functions\",\"authors\":\"C. Boit, Clemens Helfmeier, Dmitry Nedospasov\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2517300.2528523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Physically Unclonable Functions (PUF) are continuously being integrated into next generation security products. Nevertheless, their implementations and algorithms are the subject of much debate amongst the security community. One proposed use application for PUFs is replacing secure key storage. Yet the full unique PUF response of the most common type of PUFs can be recovered by using standard failure analysis equipment. SRAM PUFs used as key storage can only be considered to marginally improve security over conventional non-volatile key storage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":350304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Workshop on Trustworthy Embedded Devices\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Workshop on Trustworthy Embedded Devices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2517300.2528523\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop on Trustworthy Embedded Devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2517300.2528523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Physically Unclonable Functions (PUF) are continuously being integrated into next generation security products. Nevertheless, their implementations and algorithms are the subject of much debate amongst the security community. One proposed use application for PUFs is replacing secure key storage. Yet the full unique PUF response of the most common type of PUFs can be recovered by using standard failure analysis equipment. SRAM PUFs used as key storage can only be considered to marginally improve security over conventional non-volatile key storage.