美国北达科他州Broom Creek组区域模拟地震数据的地质统计学分析

A. Livers-Douglas, Matthew Burton-Kelly, B. Oster, Wesley D. Peck
{"title":"美国北达科他州Broom Creek组区域模拟地震数据的地质统计学分析","authors":"A. Livers-Douglas, Matthew Burton-Kelly, B. Oster, Wesley D. Peck","doi":"10.3997/2214-4609.201902261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary The Energy & Environmental Research Center is investigating the feasibility of safely and permanently storing at least 50 million tonnes of CO2 in North Dakota, United States. A regional geologic model of the injection target was created: the eolian sandstones of the Permian Broom Creek Formation. This study demonstrates how seismic data, covering a subset of the overall model region, were integrated using both multiple-point statistics (MPS) and variogram analysis. Seismic geobody interpretation enabled MPS training image development to define a lithofacies distribution, which was then used to constrain petrophysical property distributions. Alternatively, a seismic porosity inversion volume was used to calculate variograms, which were then applied in property distributions throughout the greater region. The mean and standard deviation of the porosity distributions were nearly identical in both, but porosity in the MPS case was bimodal (attributed to the facies model) versus a unimodal distribution in the variogram analysis case. These results do not indicate one approach is altogether better than the other, but geologic characteristics and control point density may make one approach more suitable. Relative agreement between the methods indicates the biggest overall benefit to a project occurs simply in having seismic data to inform model construction.","PeriodicalId":186806,"journal":{"name":"Petroleum Geostatistics 2019","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geostatistical Analysis of Seismic Data for Regional Modeling of the Broom Creek Formation, North Dakota, USA\",\"authors\":\"A. Livers-Douglas, Matthew Burton-Kelly, B. Oster, Wesley D. Peck\",\"doi\":\"10.3997/2214-4609.201902261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary The Energy & Environmental Research Center is investigating the feasibility of safely and permanently storing at least 50 million tonnes of CO2 in North Dakota, United States. A regional geologic model of the injection target was created: the eolian sandstones of the Permian Broom Creek Formation. This study demonstrates how seismic data, covering a subset of the overall model region, were integrated using both multiple-point statistics (MPS) and variogram analysis. Seismic geobody interpretation enabled MPS training image development to define a lithofacies distribution, which was then used to constrain petrophysical property distributions. Alternatively, a seismic porosity inversion volume was used to calculate variograms, which were then applied in property distributions throughout the greater region. The mean and standard deviation of the porosity distributions were nearly identical in both, but porosity in the MPS case was bimodal (attributed to the facies model) versus a unimodal distribution in the variogram analysis case. These results do not indicate one approach is altogether better than the other, but geologic characteristics and control point density may make one approach more suitable. Relative agreement between the methods indicates the biggest overall benefit to a project occurs simply in having seismic data to inform model construction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Petroleum Geostatistics 2019\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Petroleum Geostatistics 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201902261\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petroleum Geostatistics 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201902261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

能源与环境研究中心正在调查在美国北达科他州安全永久储存至少5000万吨二氧化碳的可行性。建立了注入目标的区域地质模型:二叠纪扫帚溪组风成砂岩。本研究展示了如何使用多点统计(MPS)和方差分析来整合地震数据,这些数据覆盖了整个模型区域的一个子集。地震地质体解释使MPS训练图像开发能够定义岩相分布,然后用于约束岩石物性分布。或者,使用地震孔隙度反演体积来计算变异函数,然后将其应用于整个大区域的属性分布。两者孔隙度分布的平均值和标准差几乎相同,但MPS情况下的孔隙度是双峰分布(归因于相模型),而方差分析情况下的孔隙度是单峰分布。这些结果并不表明一种方法完全优于另一种方法,但地质特征和控制点密度可能使一种方法更适合。这些方法之间的相对一致性表明,项目的最大总体效益仅仅在于拥有地震数据来为模型构建提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Geostatistical Analysis of Seismic Data for Regional Modeling of the Broom Creek Formation, North Dakota, USA
Summary The Energy & Environmental Research Center is investigating the feasibility of safely and permanently storing at least 50 million tonnes of CO2 in North Dakota, United States. A regional geologic model of the injection target was created: the eolian sandstones of the Permian Broom Creek Formation. This study demonstrates how seismic data, covering a subset of the overall model region, were integrated using both multiple-point statistics (MPS) and variogram analysis. Seismic geobody interpretation enabled MPS training image development to define a lithofacies distribution, which was then used to constrain petrophysical property distributions. Alternatively, a seismic porosity inversion volume was used to calculate variograms, which were then applied in property distributions throughout the greater region. The mean and standard deviation of the porosity distributions were nearly identical in both, but porosity in the MPS case was bimodal (attributed to the facies model) versus a unimodal distribution in the variogram analysis case. These results do not indicate one approach is altogether better than the other, but geologic characteristics and control point density may make one approach more suitable. Relative agreement between the methods indicates the biggest overall benefit to a project occurs simply in having seismic data to inform model construction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Forward Model Applied to Channelized Turbidite Systems: A Case Study of the Benin Major Valley Fill Stochastic Seismic Inversion Based on a Fuzzy Model A Bayesian Approach for Full-waveform Inversion Using Wide-aperture Seismic Data Ensemble-based Kernel Learning to Handle Rock-physics-model Imperfection in Seismic History Matching: A Real Field Case Study Features of Factor Models in Seismic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1