案例说明:People诉Buza

Athanasios Kolovos, J. K. Brewer
{"title":"案例说明:People诉Buza","authors":"Athanasios Kolovos, J. K. Brewer","doi":"10.54648/gplr2022027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This case note discusses People v. Buza, the US State and federal Constitutional issues that it raises, and the potential societal impact from an ethical standpoint. Specifically, this case involving DNA collection of California arrestees raises issues as to the Fourth Amendment which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. The note also examines Buza's progeny which, aside from the DNA collection itself, raises privacy concerns as to the uploading of actual DNA profiles to a common database. Ethical concerns raised include future societal constructions of social class and genetic engineering. The note concludes that the judiciary is lax in its interpretation of cases involving DNA as technological advancements continue to hurdle forward.\nPrivacy, DNA Profile, Fourth Amendment, DNA Identification, Genetic Engineering","PeriodicalId":127582,"journal":{"name":"Global Privacy Law Review","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Case Note: People v. Buza\",\"authors\":\"Athanasios Kolovos, J. K. Brewer\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/gplr2022027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This case note discusses People v. Buza, the US State and federal Constitutional issues that it raises, and the potential societal impact from an ethical standpoint. Specifically, this case involving DNA collection of California arrestees raises issues as to the Fourth Amendment which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. The note also examines Buza's progeny which, aside from the DNA collection itself, raises privacy concerns as to the uploading of actual DNA profiles to a common database. Ethical concerns raised include future societal constructions of social class and genetic engineering. The note concludes that the judiciary is lax in its interpretation of cases involving DNA as technological advancements continue to hurdle forward.\\nPrivacy, DNA Profile, Fourth Amendment, DNA Identification, Genetic Engineering\",\"PeriodicalId\":127582,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Privacy Law Review\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Privacy Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/gplr2022027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Privacy Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/gplr2022027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本案例说明讨论了人民诉布扎案,它所引发的美国州和联邦宪法问题,以及从伦理角度来看潜在的社会影响。具体来说,这起涉及收集加州被捕者DNA的案件引发了有关第四修正案的问题,该修正案保护人们免受不合理的搜查和扣押。这份报告还调查了Buza的后代,除了DNA收集本身,还引起了将实际DNA档案上传到公共数据库的隐私问题。提出的伦理问题包括社会阶层和基因工程的未来社会结构。该报告的结论是,随着技术进步的不断阻碍,司法部门对涉及DNA的案件的解释很松散。隐私,DNA档案,第四修正案,DNA鉴定,基因工程
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Case Note: People v. Buza
This case note discusses People v. Buza, the US State and federal Constitutional issues that it raises, and the potential societal impact from an ethical standpoint. Specifically, this case involving DNA collection of California arrestees raises issues as to the Fourth Amendment which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. The note also examines Buza's progeny which, aside from the DNA collection itself, raises privacy concerns as to the uploading of actual DNA profiles to a common database. Ethical concerns raised include future societal constructions of social class and genetic engineering. The note concludes that the judiciary is lax in its interpretation of cases involving DNA as technological advancements continue to hurdle forward. Privacy, DNA Profile, Fourth Amendment, DNA Identification, Genetic Engineering
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Key Privacy Concepts in the EU and Canada The Personal Data Under the GDPR: Concept, Elements, and Boundaries News: APAC Privacy News Collection of Personal Information in Canadian Law Case Note: Strengthening the Role of Google? Recent Developments in the Right to Be Forgotten Case Law of the CJEU (TU and RE v. Google LLC, C-460/20)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1