动态:一种自动化和独立的软件故障检测方法

A. Gates, P. Teller
{"title":"动态:一种自动化和独立的软件故障检测方法","authors":"A. Gates, P. Teller","doi":"10.1109/HASE.1999.809470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Computers are omnipresent in our society, creating a reliance that demands high-assurance systems. Traditional verification and validation approaches may not be sufficient to identify the existence of software faults. Dynamic Monitoring with Integrity Constraints (DynaMICs) augments existing approaches by including: (1) elicitation of constraints from domain experts and developers that capture knowledge about real-world objects, assumptions and limitations, (2) constraints stored and maintained separate from the program, (3) automatic generation of monitoring code and program instrumentation, (4) performance-friendly monitoring, and (5) tracing among specifications, code and documentation. The primary motivation for DynaMICs is to facilitate the detection of faults, in particular those that result from insufficient communication, changes in intended software use and errors introduced through external interfaces. After presenting related work and an overview of DynaMICs, this paper outlines the methodology used to provide an automated and independent software-fault detection system.","PeriodicalId":369187,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 4th IEEE International Symposium on High-Assurance Systems Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DynaMICs: an automated and independent software-fault detection approach\",\"authors\":\"A. Gates, P. Teller\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HASE.1999.809470\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Computers are omnipresent in our society, creating a reliance that demands high-assurance systems. Traditional verification and validation approaches may not be sufficient to identify the existence of software faults. Dynamic Monitoring with Integrity Constraints (DynaMICs) augments existing approaches by including: (1) elicitation of constraints from domain experts and developers that capture knowledge about real-world objects, assumptions and limitations, (2) constraints stored and maintained separate from the program, (3) automatic generation of monitoring code and program instrumentation, (4) performance-friendly monitoring, and (5) tracing among specifications, code and documentation. The primary motivation for DynaMICs is to facilitate the detection of faults, in particular those that result from insufficient communication, changes in intended software use and errors introduced through external interfaces. After presenting related work and an overview of DynaMICs, this paper outlines the methodology used to provide an automated and independent software-fault detection system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":369187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 4th IEEE International Symposium on High-Assurance Systems Engineering\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 4th IEEE International Symposium on High-Assurance Systems Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HASE.1999.809470\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 4th IEEE International Symposium on High-Assurance Systems Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HASE.1999.809470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

计算机在我们的社会中无处不在,创造了一种对高保证系统的依赖。传统的验证和确认方法可能不足以识别软件故障的存在。带有完整性约束的动态监控(DynaMICs)通过以下方式增强了现有的方法:(1)从领域专家和开发人员那里获取约束,这些约束捕获了关于现实世界对象、假设和限制的知识;(2)与程序分开存储和维护的约束;(3)自动生成监控代码和程序工具;(4)性能友好型监控;(5)规范、代码和文档之间的跟踪。DynaMICs的主要动机是促进故障的检测,特别是那些由于通信不足、预期软件使用的更改和通过外部接口引入的错误而导致的故障。在介绍了相关工作和动力学概述之后,本文概述了用于提供自动化和独立软件故障检测系统的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DynaMICs: an automated and independent software-fault detection approach
Computers are omnipresent in our society, creating a reliance that demands high-assurance systems. Traditional verification and validation approaches may not be sufficient to identify the existence of software faults. Dynamic Monitoring with Integrity Constraints (DynaMICs) augments existing approaches by including: (1) elicitation of constraints from domain experts and developers that capture knowledge about real-world objects, assumptions and limitations, (2) constraints stored and maintained separate from the program, (3) automatic generation of monitoring code and program instrumentation, (4) performance-friendly monitoring, and (5) tracing among specifications, code and documentation. The primary motivation for DynaMICs is to facilitate the detection of faults, in particular those that result from insufficient communication, changes in intended software use and errors introduced through external interfaces. After presenting related work and an overview of DynaMICs, this paper outlines the methodology used to provide an automated and independent software-fault detection system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Why modern systems should minimize the use of safety critical software* Fault detectability analysis for requirements validation of fault tolerant systems UML-based analysis of embedded systems using a mapping to VHDL Using COTS software in high assurance control applications Building high-assurance systems using COTS components: whether, why, when and how?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1