上帝保佑我们!期刊!日历!歌德和席勒的《生命是循环的干预》

K. Schutjer
{"title":"上帝保佑我们!期刊!日历!歌德和席勒的《生命是循环的干预》","authors":"K. Schutjer","doi":"10.1353/gyr.2021.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In their Xenien project, Goethe and Schiller weaponized the classical epigrammatic distich on behalf of their own vision of a public sphere. In response to an oversaturated market in journals and in the context of falling subscription numbers for their own journal Die Horen, they published hundreds of epigrams attacking rival journals and authors. Taking a cue from new formalist approaches, this article analyzes the specific structural and rhetorical affordances of the distich and the broader formal strategies the authors deploy in this cultural intervention. The generic resources of the epigram are deployed to disrupt a commercial circulation generated by second-rate journals and their networks of \"Philistine\" writers and critics, to deconstruct false paradigms and overblown conceptions, to parody the overaccelerated or excessively sluggish pace of cultural production and exchange, and to expose those forces bent on overturning established social or political hierarchies. At the same time, the epigrams aim to set in motion a more rhythmic circulation that aligns with natural processes and classical antecedents, is shaped by the reciprocal exchange characterizing Goethe and Schiller's own friendship, gives rise to more elastic and internally differentiated conceptions of the whole, and ultimately sustains rather than overturns societal structures.","PeriodicalId":385309,"journal":{"name":"Goethe Yearbook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heaven Help Us! Journals! Calendars!: Goethe and Schiller's Xenien as Circulatory Intervention\",\"authors\":\"K. Schutjer\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/gyr.2021.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:In their Xenien project, Goethe and Schiller weaponized the classical epigrammatic distich on behalf of their own vision of a public sphere. In response to an oversaturated market in journals and in the context of falling subscription numbers for their own journal Die Horen, they published hundreds of epigrams attacking rival journals and authors. Taking a cue from new formalist approaches, this article analyzes the specific structural and rhetorical affordances of the distich and the broader formal strategies the authors deploy in this cultural intervention. The generic resources of the epigram are deployed to disrupt a commercial circulation generated by second-rate journals and their networks of \\\"Philistine\\\" writers and critics, to deconstruct false paradigms and overblown conceptions, to parody the overaccelerated or excessively sluggish pace of cultural production and exchange, and to expose those forces bent on overturning established social or political hierarchies. At the same time, the epigrams aim to set in motion a more rhythmic circulation that aligns with natural processes and classical antecedents, is shaped by the reciprocal exchange characterizing Goethe and Schiller's own friendship, gives rise to more elastic and internally differentiated conceptions of the whole, and ultimately sustains rather than overturns societal structures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":385309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Goethe Yearbook\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Goethe Yearbook\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/gyr.2021.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Goethe Yearbook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gyr.2021.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:在歌德和席勒的《Xenien》项目中,他们将经典警句的论述武器化,以代表他们自己对公共领域的看法。为了应对期刊市场的过度饱和,以及他们自己的期刊《Die Horen》订阅数量的下降,他们发表了数百篇攻击竞争对手期刊和作者的警句。以新的形式主义方法为线索,本文分析了这篇文章的具体结构和修辞启示,以及作者在这种文化干预中采用的更广泛的形式策略。警句的一般资源被用来破坏由二流期刊及其“庸俗”作家和评论家网络产生的商业流通,解构错误的范式和夸大的概念,模仿文化生产和交流的过快或过缓的步伐,并揭露那些倾向于推翻既定社会或政治等级制度的力量。与此同时,这些警句旨在启动一种更有节奏的循环,这种循环与自然过程和古典先例相一致,由歌德和席勒自己的友谊所特有的相互交流所塑造,产生了更有弹性和内部分化的整体概念,最终维持而不是推翻社会结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Heaven Help Us! Journals! Calendars!: Goethe and Schiller's Xenien as Circulatory Intervention
Abstract:In their Xenien project, Goethe and Schiller weaponized the classical epigrammatic distich on behalf of their own vision of a public sphere. In response to an oversaturated market in journals and in the context of falling subscription numbers for their own journal Die Horen, they published hundreds of epigrams attacking rival journals and authors. Taking a cue from new formalist approaches, this article analyzes the specific structural and rhetorical affordances of the distich and the broader formal strategies the authors deploy in this cultural intervention. The generic resources of the epigram are deployed to disrupt a commercial circulation generated by second-rate journals and their networks of "Philistine" writers and critics, to deconstruct false paradigms and overblown conceptions, to parody the overaccelerated or excessively sluggish pace of cultural production and exchange, and to expose those forces bent on overturning established social or political hierarchies. At the same time, the epigrams aim to set in motion a more rhythmic circulation that aligns with natural processes and classical antecedents, is shaped by the reciprocal exchange characterizing Goethe and Schiller's own friendship, gives rise to more elastic and internally differentiated conceptions of the whole, and ultimately sustains rather than overturns societal structures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
La Roche and Goethe: Gender, Genre, and Influence Unexpected Bodies of Water: On the "Blue" Goethezeit Reading Texts Performatively: Disruptive Gestures in Heinrich von Kleist Re-Examining (White) Enlightenment Legacies through a German Lens: An Introduction The Dynastic Imagination: Family and Modernity in Nineteenth-Century Germany by Adrian Daub (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1