应对干预和提供多层次服务以支持学校包容:排斥残疾学生的悖论

Nathalie S. Trépanier
{"title":"应对干预和提供多层次服务以支持学校包容:排斥残疾学生的悖论","authors":"Nathalie S. Trépanier","doi":"10.7202/1065659ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on a scoping review, this paper provides a critical analysis on how the current application of Response to Intervention (RTI) programs and Multi-Tier Systems of Support (MTSS) interfere with inclusive education. Five paradoxical dimensions are thus presented. These include student eligibility for professional services, identification of students with special needs, roles of teachers and of special education, evidence-based interventions and standardized programs, and a limited use of the problem-solving approach. In short, we explain how RTI and MTSS can actually impede the inclusion of students with disabilities.","PeriodicalId":164568,"journal":{"name":"Understanding Exclusion to Better Work Towards Inclusion?","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LA RÉPONSE À L’INTERVENTION ET L’OFFRE DE SERVICES MULTIPALIERS POUR SOUTENIR L’INCLUSION SCOLAIRE : UN PARADOXE À VISÉE D’EXCLUSION DES ÉLÈVES EN SITUATION DE HANDICAP\",\"authors\":\"Nathalie S. Trépanier\",\"doi\":\"10.7202/1065659ar\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on a scoping review, this paper provides a critical analysis on how the current application of Response to Intervention (RTI) programs and Multi-Tier Systems of Support (MTSS) interfere with inclusive education. Five paradoxical dimensions are thus presented. These include student eligibility for professional services, identification of students with special needs, roles of teachers and of special education, evidence-based interventions and standardized programs, and a limited use of the problem-solving approach. In short, we explain how RTI and MTSS can actually impede the inclusion of students with disabilities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":164568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Understanding Exclusion to Better Work Towards Inclusion?\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Understanding Exclusion to Better Work Towards Inclusion?\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7202/1065659ar\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Understanding Exclusion to Better Work Towards Inclusion?","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1065659ar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文在回顾研究范围的基础上,批判性地分析了当前响应干预(RTI)计划和多层支持系统(MTSS)的应用如何干扰全纳教育。这样就提出了五个矛盾的方面。这些问题包括学生获得专业服务的资格、特殊需求学生的识别、教师和特殊教育的角色、基于证据的干预措施和标准化计划,以及问题解决方法的有限使用。简而言之,我们解释了RTI和MTSS实际上如何阻碍残疾学生的融入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LA RÉPONSE À L’INTERVENTION ET L’OFFRE DE SERVICES MULTIPALIERS POUR SOUTENIR L’INCLUSION SCOLAIRE : UN PARADOXE À VISÉE D’EXCLUSION DES ÉLÈVES EN SITUATION DE HANDICAP
Based on a scoping review, this paper provides a critical analysis on how the current application of Response to Intervention (RTI) programs and Multi-Tier Systems of Support (MTSS) interfere with inclusive education. Five paradoxical dimensions are thus presented. These include student eligibility for professional services, identification of students with special needs, roles of teachers and of special education, evidence-based interventions and standardized programs, and a limited use of the problem-solving approach. In short, we explain how RTI and MTSS can actually impede the inclusion of students with disabilities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ÉDITORIAL : COMPRENDRE L’EXCLUSION POUR MIEUX TENDRE VERS L’INCLUSION? ENJEUX DE COLLABORATION ENTOURANT LE PLAN D’ENSEIGNEMENT INDIVIDUALISÉ. ENTRE PROCESSUS D’INCLUSION ET D’EXCLUSION DE LA FABRICATION DE L’EXCLUSION SCOLAIRE EN MILIEU DÉFAVORISÉ ET MULTIETHNIQUE LE PARADIGME INCLUSIF À TRAVERS LE PRISME DES RAPPORTS SOCIAUX INÉGALITAIRES L’EXPÉRIENCE SCOLAIRE DU POINT DE VUE DE JEUNES AYANT UN TROUBLE DÉVELOPPEMENTAL DU LANGAGE ET DE LEURS PARENTS : L’INFLUENCE DE FACTEURS SCOLAIRES ENVIRONNEMENTAUX DANS LA FRAGILISATION DES LIENS AUX AUTRES ET À L’ÉCOLE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1