硬骨鱼和硬骨鱼

K. H. Andersen
{"title":"硬骨鱼和硬骨鱼","authors":"K. H. Andersen","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvb938mm.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter looks into the differences and similarities between the two groups of fish: the teleosts and the elasmobranchs. In the data analyses done so far in this volume, the fish most considered were the teleosts (Teleostei), which represent by far the dominant group, in terms of both biomass and living number of species. Second in line comes the cartilaginous fishes—the elasmobranchs (sharks, rays, skates, and sawfish). This chapter describes the differences between teleosts and elasmobranchs from a population dynamics perspective. It shows that the main difference between the two groups is in their offspring size strategy: teleosts make small offspring; elasmobranchs make large offspring. The chapter uses this difference to quantify the sensitivity of elasmobranchs to fishing relative to teleosts. It also develops an evolutionary explanation for why the offspring size strategy differs between teleosts and elasmobranchs.","PeriodicalId":162394,"journal":{"name":"Fish Ecology, Evolution, and Exploitation","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teleosts versus Elasmobranchs\",\"authors\":\"K. H. Andersen\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctvb938mm.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter looks into the differences and similarities between the two groups of fish: the teleosts and the elasmobranchs. In the data analyses done so far in this volume, the fish most considered were the teleosts (Teleostei), which represent by far the dominant group, in terms of both biomass and living number of species. Second in line comes the cartilaginous fishes—the elasmobranchs (sharks, rays, skates, and sawfish). This chapter describes the differences between teleosts and elasmobranchs from a population dynamics perspective. It shows that the main difference between the two groups is in their offspring size strategy: teleosts make small offspring; elasmobranchs make large offspring. The chapter uses this difference to quantify the sensitivity of elasmobranchs to fishing relative to teleosts. It also develops an evolutionary explanation for why the offspring size strategy differs between teleosts and elasmobranchs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":162394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fish Ecology, Evolution, and Exploitation\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fish Ecology, Evolution, and Exploitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvb938mm.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fish Ecology, Evolution, and Exploitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvb938mm.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章探讨硬骨鱼和硬骨鱼这两类鱼类之间的异同。在本卷迄今为止所做的数据分析中,考虑最多的鱼类是硬骨鱼(Teleostei),就生物量和活物种数量而言,它代表了迄今为止的优势群体。排在第二位的是软骨鱼——软骨鱼科(鲨鱼、鳐鱼、鳐鱼和锯鳐)。本章从种群动态的角度描述硬骨鱼和板鳃鱼的区别。研究表明,这两种鱼类的主要区别在于它们的后代大小策略:硬骨鱼的后代很小;依拉斯莫科的后代很大。本章使用这种差异来量化硬骨鱼相对于硬骨鱼对捕鱼的敏感性。它还为硬骨鱼和板鳃鱼的后代大小策略不同提供了一种进化解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Teleosts versus Elasmobranchs
This chapter looks into the differences and similarities between the two groups of fish: the teleosts and the elasmobranchs. In the data analyses done so far in this volume, the fish most considered were the teleosts (Teleostei), which represent by far the dominant group, in terms of both biomass and living number of species. Second in line comes the cartilaginous fishes—the elasmobranchs (sharks, rays, skates, and sawfish). This chapter describes the differences between teleosts and elasmobranchs from a population dynamics perspective. It shows that the main difference between the two groups is in their offspring size strategy: teleosts make small offspring; elasmobranchs make large offspring. The chapter uses this difference to quantify the sensitivity of elasmobranchs to fishing relative to teleosts. It also develops an evolutionary explanation for why the offspring size strategy differs between teleosts and elasmobranchs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CHAPTER NINE. Trait-Based Approach to Fish Ecology CHAPTER FIVE. Fishing CHAPTER THIRTEEN. The Size- and Trait-Based Approach Index Frontmatter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1