强制锁定期过长对ipo承销的影响

Riccardo Bazan
{"title":"强制锁定期过长对ipo承销的影响","authors":"Riccardo Bazan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3514886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Underwriting is the most common allocation mechanism for IPOs. Despite its diffusion, underwriting suffers from underpricing which is ultimately “money left on the table” that negatively influences the health of a company. For this reason, capital markets have identified some tools to reduce underpricing. The lockup period provision is one of them. Notwithstanding its widespread use during IPOs, lockups are neither regulated nor fixed by any financial authorities. This paper investigates the reasons why financial regulators should make the lockup clause a compulsory requirement for listing and should extend its length further than the current average.","PeriodicalId":414741,"journal":{"name":"Econometric Modeling: Financial Markets Regulation eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of a Long Mandatory Lockup Period on IPOs Underwriting\",\"authors\":\"Riccardo Bazan\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3514886\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Underwriting is the most common allocation mechanism for IPOs. Despite its diffusion, underwriting suffers from underpricing which is ultimately “money left on the table” that negatively influences the health of a company. For this reason, capital markets have identified some tools to reduce underpricing. The lockup period provision is one of them. Notwithstanding its widespread use during IPOs, lockups are neither regulated nor fixed by any financial authorities. This paper investigates the reasons why financial regulators should make the lockup clause a compulsory requirement for listing and should extend its length further than the current average.\",\"PeriodicalId\":414741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Econometric Modeling: Financial Markets Regulation eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Econometric Modeling: Financial Markets Regulation eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3514886\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometric Modeling: Financial Markets Regulation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3514886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

承销是ipo最常见的分配机制。尽管它的扩散,承销遭受定价过低,这最终是“留在桌面上的钱”,对公司的健康产生负面影响。出于这个原因,资本市场已经找到了一些减少定价过低的工具。禁售期条款就是其中之一。尽管锁定期在ipo期间被广泛使用,但它既不受任何金融当局的监管,也不受任何金融当局的限制。本文探讨了金融监管机构应将禁售条款作为上市强制要求的原因,并应将禁售条款的期限延长到目前的平均水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of a Long Mandatory Lockup Period on IPOs Underwriting
Underwriting is the most common allocation mechanism for IPOs. Despite its diffusion, underwriting suffers from underpricing which is ultimately “money left on the table” that negatively influences the health of a company. For this reason, capital markets have identified some tools to reduce underpricing. The lockup period provision is one of them. Notwithstanding its widespread use during IPOs, lockups are neither regulated nor fixed by any financial authorities. This paper investigates the reasons why financial regulators should make the lockup clause a compulsory requirement for listing and should extend its length further than the current average.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamic CoVaR Third Party Monitoring, Regulatory Compliance and Financial Reporting: Evidence from Banking Who watches the Auctioneer? Supervising primary bond markets to reduce agency costs MiCA and DeFi ('Proposal for a Regulation on Market in Crypto-Assets' and 'Decentralised Finance') COVID-19, Credit Risk and Macro Fundamentals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1