现有点云质量评价方法综述

H. Fretes, M. Gomez-Redondo, E. Paiva, J. Rodas, R. Gregor
{"title":"现有点云质量评价方法综述","authors":"H. Fretes, M. Gomez-Redondo, E. Paiva, J. Rodas, R. Gregor","doi":"10.1109/REDUAS47371.2019.8999725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One problem in 3D reconstruction from aerial photographs is the evaluation of the point clouds quality. For point clouds, in general, different authors evaluate their results in different ways. This paper analyzes the existing evaluation methods for the point cloud quality and a new discussion regarding their applicability to aerial photographs is opened. Some of these methods are chosen based on practical issues and applied to a pair of reconstructions. The principal conclusion is that objective methods are the most interesting in photogrammetry applications, particularly the comparison between two point clouds.","PeriodicalId":351115,"journal":{"name":"2019 Workshop on Research, Education and Development of Unmanned Aerial Systems (RED UAS)","volume":"9 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Review of Existing Evaluation Methods for Point Clouds Quality\",\"authors\":\"H. Fretes, M. Gomez-Redondo, E. Paiva, J. Rodas, R. Gregor\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/REDUAS47371.2019.8999725\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One problem in 3D reconstruction from aerial photographs is the evaluation of the point clouds quality. For point clouds, in general, different authors evaluate their results in different ways. This paper analyzes the existing evaluation methods for the point cloud quality and a new discussion regarding their applicability to aerial photographs is opened. Some of these methods are chosen based on practical issues and applied to a pair of reconstructions. The principal conclusion is that objective methods are the most interesting in photogrammetry applications, particularly the comparison between two point clouds.\",\"PeriodicalId\":351115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 Workshop on Research, Education and Development of Unmanned Aerial Systems (RED UAS)\",\"volume\":\"9 5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 Workshop on Research, Education and Development of Unmanned Aerial Systems (RED UAS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/REDUAS47371.2019.8999725\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Workshop on Research, Education and Development of Unmanned Aerial Systems (RED UAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/REDUAS47371.2019.8999725","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

航拍图像三维重建中的一个问题是点云质量的评价。对于点云,一般来说,不同的作者以不同的方式评估他们的结果。本文分析了现有的点云质量评价方法,并对其在航空照片中的适用性进行了新的探讨。其中一些方法是根据实际问题选择的,并应用于一对重建。主要结论是,客观方法在摄影测量应用中最有趣,特别是两点云之间的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Review of Existing Evaluation Methods for Point Clouds Quality
One problem in 3D reconstruction from aerial photographs is the evaluation of the point clouds quality. For point clouds, in general, different authors evaluate their results in different ways. This paper analyzes the existing evaluation methods for the point cloud quality and a new discussion regarding their applicability to aerial photographs is opened. Some of these methods are chosen based on practical issues and applied to a pair of reconstructions. The principal conclusion is that objective methods are the most interesting in photogrammetry applications, particularly the comparison between two point clouds.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Distributed Multi-Target Tracking with D-DBSCAN Clustering Cognitive Communication Scheme for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Operation A Nonlinear Attitude Controller for Drones with CMG (Control Momentum Gyro) Decentralized Hybrid Flocking Guidance for a Swarm of Small UAVs RED UAS 2019 Keyword Index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1