减少基于人工智能的视觉艺术品分析中的偏差

Zhuomin Zhang, Jia Li, David G. Stork, Elizabeth C. Mansfield, John Russell, Catherine Adams, James Ze Wang
{"title":"减少基于人工智能的视觉艺术品分析中的偏差","authors":"Zhuomin Zhang, Jia Li, David G. Stork, Elizabeth C. Mansfield, John Russell, Catherine Adams, James Ze Wang","doi":"10.1109/MBITS.2022.3197102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Empirical research in science and the humanities is vulnerable to bias which, by definition, implies incorrect or misleading findings. Artificial intelligence-based analysis of visual artworks is vulnerable to bias in ways specific to the domain. Works of art belong to a distinct cultural category that often prioritizes such characteristics as hand-craftsmanship, uniqueness, originality, and imaginative content; works of art are also responsive to diverse social and cultural contexts. Ascertaining which features of an artwork can be rightly ascribed to an objective “truth,” without which the concept of bias is not even relevant, is itself challenging. Incorporating expert knowledge into machine learning applications can help reduce bias in final estimates. We review several sources of bias that can occur across different stages of AI-based analysis, protocols, and best practices for reducing bias, and approaches to measuring these biases. This systematic investigation of various types of bias can help researchers better understand bias, become aware of practical solutions, and ultimately cultivate the prudent adoption of AI-based approaches to artwork analysis.","PeriodicalId":448036,"journal":{"name":"IEEE BITS the Information Theory Magazine","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reducing Bias in AI-Based Analysis of Visual Artworks\",\"authors\":\"Zhuomin Zhang, Jia Li, David G. Stork, Elizabeth C. Mansfield, John Russell, Catherine Adams, James Ze Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MBITS.2022.3197102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Empirical research in science and the humanities is vulnerable to bias which, by definition, implies incorrect or misleading findings. Artificial intelligence-based analysis of visual artworks is vulnerable to bias in ways specific to the domain. Works of art belong to a distinct cultural category that often prioritizes such characteristics as hand-craftsmanship, uniqueness, originality, and imaginative content; works of art are also responsive to diverse social and cultural contexts. Ascertaining which features of an artwork can be rightly ascribed to an objective “truth,” without which the concept of bias is not even relevant, is itself challenging. Incorporating expert knowledge into machine learning applications can help reduce bias in final estimates. We review several sources of bias that can occur across different stages of AI-based analysis, protocols, and best practices for reducing bias, and approaches to measuring these biases. This systematic investigation of various types of bias can help researchers better understand bias, become aware of practical solutions, and ultimately cultivate the prudent adoption of AI-based approaches to artwork analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":448036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE BITS the Information Theory Magazine\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE BITS the Information Theory Magazine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MBITS.2022.3197102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE BITS the Information Theory Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MBITS.2022.3197102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

科学和人文学科的实证研究容易受到偏见的影响,根据定义,偏见意味着不正确或误导性的发现。基于人工智能的视觉艺术品分析很容易受到特定领域的偏见。艺术作品属于一个独特的文化类别,通常优先考虑手工工艺、独特性、原创性和富有想象力的内容等特征;艺术作品也对不同的社会和文化背景作出反应。确定一件艺术品的哪些特征可以被正确地归因于客观的“真相”,如果没有这些特征,偏见的概念甚至是不相关的,这本身就是一个挑战。将专家知识纳入机器学习应用程序可以帮助减少最终估计中的偏差。我们回顾了在基于人工智能的分析的不同阶段可能发生的几种偏差来源,减少偏差的协议和最佳实践,以及测量这些偏差的方法。这种对各种类型偏见的系统调查可以帮助研究人员更好地理解偏见,意识到实际的解决方案,并最终培养谨慎采用基于人工智能的方法来分析艺术品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reducing Bias in AI-Based Analysis of Visual Artworks
Empirical research in science and the humanities is vulnerable to bias which, by definition, implies incorrect or misleading findings. Artificial intelligence-based analysis of visual artworks is vulnerable to bias in ways specific to the domain. Works of art belong to a distinct cultural category that often prioritizes such characteristics as hand-craftsmanship, uniqueness, originality, and imaginative content; works of art are also responsive to diverse social and cultural contexts. Ascertaining which features of an artwork can be rightly ascribed to an objective “truth,” without which the concept of bias is not even relevant, is itself challenging. Incorporating expert knowledge into machine learning applications can help reduce bias in final estimates. We review several sources of bias that can occur across different stages of AI-based analysis, protocols, and best practices for reducing bias, and approaches to measuring these biases. This systematic investigation of various types of bias can help researchers better understand bias, become aware of practical solutions, and ultimately cultivate the prudent adoption of AI-based approaches to artwork analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Belief Propagation for Classical and Quantum Systems: Overview and Recent Results QKD Based on Time-Entangled Photons and Its Key-Rate Promise Shaping Postquantum Cryptography: The Hidden Subgroup and Shift Problems OTFS—A Mathematical Foundation for Communication and Radar Sensing in the Delay-Doppler Domain Survey of Grammar-Based Data Structure Compression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1