在可重构dcn中实现高效路由

Zhenjie Yang, Yong Cui, Shihan Xiao, Xin Wang, Minming Li, Chuming Li, Yadong Liu
{"title":"在可重构dcn中实现高效路由","authors":"Zhenjie Yang, Yong Cui, Shihan Xiao, Xin Wang, Minming Li, Chuming Li, Yadong Liu","doi":"10.1145/3393691.3394175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the fast growth of cloud services and network scales, the heavy and highly dynamic traffic demands pose great challenges to the efficient traffic engineering in today's data center networks (DCNs) [21]. The DCN flows can be broadly classified into two main categories: delay-sensitive small flows (e.g., queries or realtime small messages) and throughput-sensitive large flows (e.g., the backup traffic). In general, more than 80% flows in data centers are small flows, while the majority of the traffic volume is contributed by the top 10% large flows [3, 7]. To handle the mixed traffic, today's data centers [1, 14] generally follow the tree-based topologies (e.g., fat-tree) and take the load-agnostic routing strategies based on random path selection (e.g., ECMP1) [14, 19]. Although it is applicable for routing small flows which are highly random, these strategies are likely to route several large flows through the same output link and lead to long-lived congestions [2, 8]. With the limited switch buffer occupied by large flows for a long time, small flows are reported to experience one order of magnitude larger delay, which compromises the performance of DCNs and makes the users suffer [3].","PeriodicalId":188517,"journal":{"name":"Abstracts of the 2020 SIGMETRICS/Performance Joint International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Achieving Efficient Routing in Reconfigurable DCNs\",\"authors\":\"Zhenjie Yang, Yong Cui, Shihan Xiao, Xin Wang, Minming Li, Chuming Li, Yadong Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3393691.3394175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the fast growth of cloud services and network scales, the heavy and highly dynamic traffic demands pose great challenges to the efficient traffic engineering in today's data center networks (DCNs) [21]. The DCN flows can be broadly classified into two main categories: delay-sensitive small flows (e.g., queries or realtime small messages) and throughput-sensitive large flows (e.g., the backup traffic). In general, more than 80% flows in data centers are small flows, while the majority of the traffic volume is contributed by the top 10% large flows [3, 7]. To handle the mixed traffic, today's data centers [1, 14] generally follow the tree-based topologies (e.g., fat-tree) and take the load-agnostic routing strategies based on random path selection (e.g., ECMP1) [14, 19]. Although it is applicable for routing small flows which are highly random, these strategies are likely to route several large flows through the same output link and lead to long-lived congestions [2, 8]. With the limited switch buffer occupied by large flows for a long time, small flows are reported to experience one order of magnitude larger delay, which compromises the performance of DCNs and makes the users suffer [3].\",\"PeriodicalId\":188517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Abstracts of the 2020 SIGMETRICS/Performance Joint International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Abstracts of the 2020 SIGMETRICS/Performance Joint International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3393691.3394175\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abstracts of the 2020 SIGMETRICS/Performance Joint International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3393691.3394175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

随着云服务和网络规模的快速增长,海量、高动态的流量需求对当今数据中心网络(DCNs)的高效流量工程提出了巨大挑战[21]。DCN流可以大致分为两大类:延迟敏感的小流(例如,查询或实时小消息)和吞吐量敏感的大流(例如,备份流量)。一般来说,数据中心80%以上的流量是小流量,而大部分流量是由前10%的大流量贡献的[3,7]。为了处理混合流量,当今的数据中心[1,14]通常遵循基于树的拓扑(如胖树),并采用基于随机路径选择的负载不可知路由策略(如ECMP1)[14,19]。虽然它适用于路由高度随机的小流,但这些策略很可能通过相同的输出链路路由几个大流,并导致长时间的拥塞[2,8]。由于大流量长时间占用有限开关缓冲区,据报道,小流量的延迟要大一个数量级,这会影响DCNs的性能,让用户感到痛苦[3]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Achieving Efficient Routing in Reconfigurable DCNs
With the fast growth of cloud services and network scales, the heavy and highly dynamic traffic demands pose great challenges to the efficient traffic engineering in today's data center networks (DCNs) [21]. The DCN flows can be broadly classified into two main categories: delay-sensitive small flows (e.g., queries or realtime small messages) and throughput-sensitive large flows (e.g., the backup traffic). In general, more than 80% flows in data centers are small flows, while the majority of the traffic volume is contributed by the top 10% large flows [3, 7]. To handle the mixed traffic, today's data centers [1, 14] generally follow the tree-based topologies (e.g., fat-tree) and take the load-agnostic routing strategies based on random path selection (e.g., ECMP1) [14, 19]. Although it is applicable for routing small flows which are highly random, these strategies are likely to route several large flows through the same output link and lead to long-lived congestions [2, 8]. With the limited switch buffer occupied by large flows for a long time, small flows are reported to experience one order of magnitude larger delay, which compromises the performance of DCNs and makes the users suffer [3].
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Latency Imbalance Among Internet Load-Balanced Paths: A Cloud-Centric View Fundamental Limits of Approximate Gradient Coding Staleness Control for Edge Data Analytics vrfinder: Finding Outbound Addresses in Traceroute The Great Internet TCP Congestion Control Census
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1