社会科学问题教学的SSI-PCK框架概念化

Hyunju Lee
{"title":"社会科学问题教学的SSI-PCK框架概念化","authors":"Hyunju Lee","doi":"10.14697/JKASE.2016.36.4.0539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the study is to conceptualize SSI-PCK by identifying major components and sub-components to promote science teachers’ confidence and knowledge on teaching SSIs. To achieve this, I conducted extensive literature reviews on teachers’ perceptions on SSI, case studies of teachers addressing SSIs, SSI instructional strategies, etc. as well as PCK. Results indicate that SSI-PCK include six major components: 1) Orientation for Teaching SSI (OTS), 2) Knowledge of Instructional Strategies for Teaching SSI (KIS), 3) Knowledge of Curriculum (KC), 4) Knowledge of Students’ SSI Learning (KSL), 5) Knowledge of Assessment in SSI Learning (KAS), and 6) Knowledge of Learning Contexts (KLC). OTS refers to teachers’ instructional goals and intentions for teaching SSIs. Teachers often present a) activity-driven, b) knowledge and higher order thinking skills, c) application of science in everyday life, d) nature of science and technology, e) citizenship and f) activism orientations for teaching SSIs. KIS indicates teachers’ instructional knowledge required for effectively designing and implementing SSI lessons. It includes a) SSI lesson design, b) utilizing progressive instructional strategies, and c) constructing collaborative classroom cultures. KC refers to teachers’ knowledge on a) connection to science curriculum (horizontal/vertical) and b) connection to other subject matters. KSL refers to teachers’ knowledge on a) learner experiences in SSI learning, b) difficulties in SSI learning, and c) SSI reasoning patterns. KAS indicates teachers’ knowledge on a) dimensions of SSI learning to assess, and b) methods of assessing SSI learning. Finally, KLC refers to teachers’ knowledge on the cultures of a) classrooms, b) schools, and c) community and society where they are located when teaching SSIs.","PeriodicalId":107400,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conceptualization of an SSI-PCK Framework for Teaching Socioscientific Issues\",\"authors\":\"Hyunju Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.14697/JKASE.2016.36.4.0539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of the study is to conceptualize SSI-PCK by identifying major components and sub-components to promote science teachers’ confidence and knowledge on teaching SSIs. To achieve this, I conducted extensive literature reviews on teachers’ perceptions on SSI, case studies of teachers addressing SSIs, SSI instructional strategies, etc. as well as PCK. Results indicate that SSI-PCK include six major components: 1) Orientation for Teaching SSI (OTS), 2) Knowledge of Instructional Strategies for Teaching SSI (KIS), 3) Knowledge of Curriculum (KC), 4) Knowledge of Students’ SSI Learning (KSL), 5) Knowledge of Assessment in SSI Learning (KAS), and 6) Knowledge of Learning Contexts (KLC). OTS refers to teachers’ instructional goals and intentions for teaching SSIs. Teachers often present a) activity-driven, b) knowledge and higher order thinking skills, c) application of science in everyday life, d) nature of science and technology, e) citizenship and f) activism orientations for teaching SSIs. KIS indicates teachers’ instructional knowledge required for effectively designing and implementing SSI lessons. It includes a) SSI lesson design, b) utilizing progressive instructional strategies, and c) constructing collaborative classroom cultures. KC refers to teachers’ knowledge on a) connection to science curriculum (horizontal/vertical) and b) connection to other subject matters. KSL refers to teachers’ knowledge on a) learner experiences in SSI learning, b) difficulties in SSI learning, and c) SSI reasoning patterns. KAS indicates teachers’ knowledge on a) dimensions of SSI learning to assess, and b) methods of assessing SSI learning. Finally, KLC refers to teachers’ knowledge on the cultures of a) classrooms, b) schools, and c) community and society where they are located when teaching SSIs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":107400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2016.36.4.0539\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2016.36.4.0539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本研究的目的是通过识别主成分和子成分来概念化SSI-PCK,以促进科学教师对ssi教学的信心和知识。为了实现这一目标,我对教师对SSI的看法、教师解决SSI的案例研究、SSI教学策略等以及PCK进行了广泛的文献综述。结果表明,SSI- pck包括6个主要组成部分:1)SSI教学取向(OTS), 2) SSI教学策略知识(KIS), 3)课程知识(KC), 4) SSI学生学习知识(KSL), 5) SSI学习评价知识(KAS), 6)学习情境知识(KLC)。OTS是指教师对ssi进行教学的教学目标和意图。教师通常提出a)活动驱动型,b)知识和高阶思维技能,c)科学在日常生活中的应用,d)科学和技术的性质,e)公民意识和f)行动主义取向来教授ssi。KIS表明教师有效设计和实施SSI课程所需的教学知识。它包括a) SSI课程设计,b)利用渐进式教学策略,以及c)构建协作课堂文化。KC是指教师在以下方面的知识:a)与科学课程(横向/纵向)的联系;b)与其他学科的联系。KSL是指教师对以下方面的知识:a)学习者在SSI学习中的经验;b) SSI学习中的困难;c) SSI推理模式。KAS表示教师对a)评估SSI学习的维度,b)评估SSI学习的方法的了解。最后,KLC是指教师在教学ssi时对a)教室、b)学校、c)所在社区和社会文化的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Conceptualization of an SSI-PCK Framework for Teaching Socioscientific Issues
The purpose of the study is to conceptualize SSI-PCK by identifying major components and sub-components to promote science teachers’ confidence and knowledge on teaching SSIs. To achieve this, I conducted extensive literature reviews on teachers’ perceptions on SSI, case studies of teachers addressing SSIs, SSI instructional strategies, etc. as well as PCK. Results indicate that SSI-PCK include six major components: 1) Orientation for Teaching SSI (OTS), 2) Knowledge of Instructional Strategies for Teaching SSI (KIS), 3) Knowledge of Curriculum (KC), 4) Knowledge of Students’ SSI Learning (KSL), 5) Knowledge of Assessment in SSI Learning (KAS), and 6) Knowledge of Learning Contexts (KLC). OTS refers to teachers’ instructional goals and intentions for teaching SSIs. Teachers often present a) activity-driven, b) knowledge and higher order thinking skills, c) application of science in everyday life, d) nature of science and technology, e) citizenship and f) activism orientations for teaching SSIs. KIS indicates teachers’ instructional knowledge required for effectively designing and implementing SSI lessons. It includes a) SSI lesson design, b) utilizing progressive instructional strategies, and c) constructing collaborative classroom cultures. KC refers to teachers’ knowledge on a) connection to science curriculum (horizontal/vertical) and b) connection to other subject matters. KSL refers to teachers’ knowledge on a) learner experiences in SSI learning, b) difficulties in SSI learning, and c) SSI reasoning patterns. KAS indicates teachers’ knowledge on a) dimensions of SSI learning to assess, and b) methods of assessing SSI learning. Finally, KLC refers to teachers’ knowledge on the cultures of a) classrooms, b) schools, and c) community and society where they are located when teaching SSIs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
2015 개정 과학과 교육과정의 적용에 대한 초·중학교 교사의 인식과 요구 STEAM 기반 학생 연구 활동 분석을 통한 과학 교육에 대한 시사점 고찰 한국, 미국, 영국, 싱가포르의 과학 교육과정 비교 - 에너지 개념을 중심으로 - A Case Study on Application of the NABI Program to Realize the 'Practice Centered Mechanism of Manifesting Character' Item Response Analysis of Energy as a Cross-Cutting Concept for Grades 3 to 9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1