两份诺道夫-罗宾斯量表对结节性硬化症的结构效度测定

Aline Moreira Brandão André, C. Gomes, C. Loureiro
{"title":"两份诺道夫-罗宾斯量表对结节性硬化症的结构效度测定","authors":"Aline Moreira Brandão André, C. Gomes, C. Loureiro","doi":"10.22533/at.ed.00221180619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the years, Music Therapy has focused on conducting several clinical studies to verify treatment efficacy. However, only in the last two decades the amount of studies have increased based on the validation of specific Music Therapy assessment instruments. The basis for validating these instruments has its origin in psychometry. Psychometry, in turn, has been influenced by a secular practice that it would be possible to make inferences about the population from an individual. However, studies show that the correct thing is to evaluate an individual several times in order to make an inference about him. Thus, in this study, an evaluation of a patient diagnosed with Tuberous Sclerosis, autism and mental disability was carried out in order to verify the structural validity of the two scales for this patient. The evaluations took place from 120 excerpts of video recordings of Music Therapy interventions. The \"Child-Therapist Relationship in the Coactive Musical Experience Scale\" and the \"Musical Communicativennes Scale\" were used as assessment instruments. Data analysis took place by testing different models of confirmatory factor analysis of items where the scales latent variables were analyzed. It was evident that for the analyzed patient, considering the 120 excerpts of the video recordings, the two scales showed confidence only for the general latent variable, the interaction. This study contributes to rethink scales’ use. In addition, it contributes to other studies to be carried out on structural validity with other individuals, diagnoses, instruments and approaches.","PeriodicalId":289292,"journal":{"name":"Serviços e cuidados em saúde 3","volume":"18 9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MEASURING THE STRUCTURAL VALIDITY OF TWO NORDOFF-ROBBINS SCALES FOR A PATIENT WITH TUBEROUS SCLEROSIS\",\"authors\":\"Aline Moreira Brandão André, C. Gomes, C. Loureiro\",\"doi\":\"10.22533/at.ed.00221180619\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the years, Music Therapy has focused on conducting several clinical studies to verify treatment efficacy. However, only in the last two decades the amount of studies have increased based on the validation of specific Music Therapy assessment instruments. The basis for validating these instruments has its origin in psychometry. Psychometry, in turn, has been influenced by a secular practice that it would be possible to make inferences about the population from an individual. However, studies show that the correct thing is to evaluate an individual several times in order to make an inference about him. Thus, in this study, an evaluation of a patient diagnosed with Tuberous Sclerosis, autism and mental disability was carried out in order to verify the structural validity of the two scales for this patient. The evaluations took place from 120 excerpts of video recordings of Music Therapy interventions. The \\\"Child-Therapist Relationship in the Coactive Musical Experience Scale\\\" and the \\\"Musical Communicativennes Scale\\\" were used as assessment instruments. Data analysis took place by testing different models of confirmatory factor analysis of items where the scales latent variables were analyzed. It was evident that for the analyzed patient, considering the 120 excerpts of the video recordings, the two scales showed confidence only for the general latent variable, the interaction. This study contributes to rethink scales’ use. In addition, it contributes to other studies to be carried out on structural validity with other individuals, diagnoses, instruments and approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":289292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Serviços e cuidados em saúde 3\",\"volume\":\"18 9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Serviços e cuidados em saúde 3\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22533/at.ed.00221180619\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Serviços e cuidados em saúde 3","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22533/at.ed.00221180619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

多年来,音乐疗法一直致力于开展多项临床研究,以验证治疗效果。然而,仅在过去二十年中,基于特定音乐治疗评估工具的验证的研究数量才有所增加。验证这些仪器的基础起源于心理测量学。反过来,心理测量学受到了一种世俗实践的影响,即可以从个体中推断出总体。然而,研究表明,正确的做法是对一个人进行多次评估,以便对他做出推断。因此,本研究对一名诊断为结节性硬化症、自闭症和精神残疾的患者进行评估,以验证两种量表对该患者的结构效度。评估是从120段音乐疗法干预的录像片段中进行的。采用《儿童与治疗师合作音乐体验量表》和《音乐交流量表》作为评估工具。数据分析是通过测试不同的验证性因子分析模型来进行的,其中分析了量表潜在变量。很明显,对于被分析的患者,考虑到120个视频记录的摘录,两个量表仅对一般潜在变量,即相互作用显示出置信度。这项研究有助于重新思考尺度的使用。此外,它有助于与其他个体,诊断,工具和方法一起进行结构效度的其他研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MEASURING THE STRUCTURAL VALIDITY OF TWO NORDOFF-ROBBINS SCALES FOR A PATIENT WITH TUBEROUS SCLEROSIS
Over the years, Music Therapy has focused on conducting several clinical studies to verify treatment efficacy. However, only in the last two decades the amount of studies have increased based on the validation of specific Music Therapy assessment instruments. The basis for validating these instruments has its origin in psychometry. Psychometry, in turn, has been influenced by a secular practice that it would be possible to make inferences about the population from an individual. However, studies show that the correct thing is to evaluate an individual several times in order to make an inference about him. Thus, in this study, an evaluation of a patient diagnosed with Tuberous Sclerosis, autism and mental disability was carried out in order to verify the structural validity of the two scales for this patient. The evaluations took place from 120 excerpts of video recordings of Music Therapy interventions. The "Child-Therapist Relationship in the Coactive Musical Experience Scale" and the "Musical Communicativennes Scale" were used as assessment instruments. Data analysis took place by testing different models of confirmatory factor analysis of items where the scales latent variables were analyzed. It was evident that for the analyzed patient, considering the 120 excerpts of the video recordings, the two scales showed confidence only for the general latent variable, the interaction. This study contributes to rethink scales’ use. In addition, it contributes to other studies to be carried out on structural validity with other individuals, diagnoses, instruments and approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
INTEGRALIDADE NO PRÉ-NATAL SOB A PERSPECTIVA DE PUÉRPERAS EM UMA CIDADE DO INTERIOR DE MINAS GERAIS AVALIAÇÃO DOS SERVIÇOS DE ESTOMATOLOGIA DA CIDADE DE MAPUTO – MOÇAMBIQUE, 2016 TERAPIA ANTIMICROBIANA: AVALIAÇÃO DA FORMAÇÃO ACADÊMICA EM DIFERENTES CURSOS DA SAÚDE ANÁLISE DOS ACIDENTES DE TRÂNSITO ENVOLVENDO CICLISTAS EM RIBEIRÃO PRETO/SÃO PAULO AVALIAÇÃO DE CONHECIMENTO EM PROTEÇÃO RADIOLÓGICA NA COMUNIDADE ACADÊMICA: UM ESTUDO TRANSVERSAL
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1