技能的能力方法:通过概念化技能弥合学科差异

B. Thapa
{"title":"技能的能力方法:通过概念化技能弥合学科差异","authors":"B. Thapa","doi":"10.3126/tvet.v1i15.45176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 21st-century social science calls for trans-disciplinary perspectives. In an attempt to address this call, this paper offers a trans-disciplinary take on the concept of skill. The author delves into understanding the concept skill and explores its conceptualization across disciplines economics, sociology, and psychology. In so doing, literature review over this concept suggested that there currently exists disciplinary differentials over the concerned idea. Further, the author offers the capability approach as an alternative to understand and define skill. While skill gets explained from the economic, sociological, and psychological fields, the persistent disciplinary differentials make the conception of skill fuzzy. The author argues that the capability approach potentially bridges the disciplinary segmentation over the concept skill.","PeriodicalId":298944,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Technical and Vocational Education and Training","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Capability Approach to Skill: Bridging the Disciplinary Differentials over Conceptualizing Skill\",\"authors\":\"B. Thapa\",\"doi\":\"10.3126/tvet.v1i15.45176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The 21st-century social science calls for trans-disciplinary perspectives. In an attempt to address this call, this paper offers a trans-disciplinary take on the concept of skill. The author delves into understanding the concept skill and explores its conceptualization across disciplines economics, sociology, and psychology. In so doing, literature review over this concept suggested that there currently exists disciplinary differentials over the concerned idea. Further, the author offers the capability approach as an alternative to understand and define skill. While skill gets explained from the economic, sociological, and psychological fields, the persistent disciplinary differentials make the conception of skill fuzzy. The author argues that the capability approach potentially bridges the disciplinary segmentation over the concept skill.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Technical and Vocational Education and Training\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Technical and Vocational Education and Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3126/tvet.v1i15.45176\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Technical and Vocational Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/tvet.v1i15.45176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

21世纪的社会科学需要跨学科的视角。为了解决这个问题,本文提出了一个跨学科的技能概念。作者深入了解概念技能,并在经济学,社会学和心理学等学科中探索其概念化。因此,对这一概念的文献回顾表明,目前有关概念存在学科差异。此外,作者提供了能力方法作为理解和定义技能的替代方法。虽然技能从经济学、社会学和心理学领域得到了解释,但持续的学科差异使技能的概念变得模糊。作者认为,能力方法潜在地跨越了技能概念上的学科分割。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Capability Approach to Skill: Bridging the Disciplinary Differentials over Conceptualizing Skill
The 21st-century social science calls for trans-disciplinary perspectives. In an attempt to address this call, this paper offers a trans-disciplinary take on the concept of skill. The author delves into understanding the concept skill and explores its conceptualization across disciplines economics, sociology, and psychology. In so doing, literature review over this concept suggested that there currently exists disciplinary differentials over the concerned idea. Further, the author offers the capability approach as an alternative to understand and define skill. While skill gets explained from the economic, sociological, and psychological fields, the persistent disciplinary differentials make the conception of skill fuzzy. The author argues that the capability approach potentially bridges the disciplinary segmentation over the concept skill.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recognition of Prior Learning in Nepal: A Gateway to Socio-Economic Inclusion Labor Market Information System: A Review of Some Practices Foster TVET Regime for Vibrant Economy Quality Assurance in West African TVET Institutions: A Brief Literature Review Declining Enrollment in Long-Term Engineering Programs: Stakeholders’ Perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1