Kec babatangang村信托基金的社区赋权研究。Mappakasunggu, Kab。Takalar

Nining Haslinda Zainal, Fivi Elvira, Rizka Jafar
{"title":"Kec babatangang村信托基金的社区赋权研究。Mappakasunggu, Kab。Takalar","authors":"Nining Haslinda Zainal, Fivi Elvira, Rizka Jafar","doi":"10.31947/jakpp.v7i1.11688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines How the Design of the Society Empowerment Field Program, and the factors of resistor empowerment Field at Desa Pa’batangang, Kecamatan Mappakasunggu, Kabupaten Takalar. This phenomenon seeing that countryside fund policy is not maximum to superintendence it, by seeing of the indication of less involvement societies to the forum of countryside development plan, and the effects are many activities that unsuitable with society’s needs, and the execution of activity is not well presentation. In Permendesa PDTT number 11 years 2019 clause 5 concerning use priority countryside funds, it states that there are two sectors that become priority; countryside development and society empowerment which these two sectors should run simultaneously. However, Society Empowerment Field Program become neglected, most of the utilization countryside fund only focused on physical project, staff like pretend resources potency which is exist in countryside. Whereas, towards build the autonomous countryside, it very important to have support from government that become beneficial. This article may useful for the government of Takalar regency, along expansion countryside fund program. Research informant: Head of Countryside, Staff, Technical Practitioner, and Societies. Research scientific used qualitative. Data aggregation through interview, observation, secondary data study. Researcher used Data analysis technique’s Miles and Huberman. Based on research, that the result of Program manifested in two sectors; development and society empowerment. From both sectors, it shows that there is Fund Allocation distributed on activity which is not productive and there is no impact on society’s economic growth. Thereafter, which become resistor factor of the society empowerment are rigid regulation and the homogeneous activity, less manpower, less socialization, society access to the program is low and tend to hegemonic, the society only involved in taking and implementing activity, and the consequence is simply tend to active formality.  \n ","PeriodicalId":151118,"journal":{"name":"JAKPP (Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan & Pelayanan Publik)","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Studi Pemberdayaan Masyarakat pada Program Dana Desa di Desa Pa’batangang, Kec. Mappakasunggu, Kab. Takalar\",\"authors\":\"Nining Haslinda Zainal, Fivi Elvira, Rizka Jafar\",\"doi\":\"10.31947/jakpp.v7i1.11688\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines How the Design of the Society Empowerment Field Program, and the factors of resistor empowerment Field at Desa Pa’batangang, Kecamatan Mappakasunggu, Kabupaten Takalar. This phenomenon seeing that countryside fund policy is not maximum to superintendence it, by seeing of the indication of less involvement societies to the forum of countryside development plan, and the effects are many activities that unsuitable with society’s needs, and the execution of activity is not well presentation. In Permendesa PDTT number 11 years 2019 clause 5 concerning use priority countryside funds, it states that there are two sectors that become priority; countryside development and society empowerment which these two sectors should run simultaneously. However, Society Empowerment Field Program become neglected, most of the utilization countryside fund only focused on physical project, staff like pretend resources potency which is exist in countryside. Whereas, towards build the autonomous countryside, it very important to have support from government that become beneficial. This article may useful for the government of Takalar regency, along expansion countryside fund program. Research informant: Head of Countryside, Staff, Technical Practitioner, and Societies. Research scientific used qualitative. Data aggregation through interview, observation, secondary data study. Researcher used Data analysis technique’s Miles and Huberman. Based on research, that the result of Program manifested in two sectors; development and society empowerment. From both sectors, it shows that there is Fund Allocation distributed on activity which is not productive and there is no impact on society’s economic growth. Thereafter, which become resistor factor of the society empowerment are rigid regulation and the homogeneous activity, less manpower, less socialization, society access to the program is low and tend to hegemonic, the society only involved in taking and implementing activity, and the consequence is simply tend to active formality.  \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":151118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAKPP (Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan & Pelayanan Publik)\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAKPP (Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan & Pelayanan Publik)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31947/jakpp.v7i1.11688\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAKPP (Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan & Pelayanan Publik)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31947/jakpp.v7i1.11688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文考察了在Desa Pa 'batangang, Kecamatan mappakassungu, Kabupaten Takalar如何设计社会赋权场方案,以及电阻赋权场的因素。从这一现象可以看出,农村资金政策对农村发展规划的监管力度不够,社会对农村发展规划论坛的参与度较低,其效果是许多活动不符合社会需求,活动的执行力没有得到很好的体现。在Permendesa PDTT第11年2019条款中,关于使用优先农村资金的第5条规定,有两个部门成为优先事项;农村发展和社会赋权应该同时进行。然而,社会赋权的实地项目却被忽视,大部分农村资金的使用只集中在实物项目上,像假装资源效力的工作人员一样存在于农村。然而,在建设自治农村的过程中,政府的支持是非常重要的。本文对塔克拉拉尔自治州政府扩大农村基金计划有一定的参考价值。研究资料提供者:农村负责人、工作人员、技术从业者和社团。科学研究采用定性。通过访谈、观察、二手数据研究进行数据汇总。研究者使用了数据分析技术的Miles和Huberman。研究表明,该方案的效果主要表现在两个方面;发展和社会赋权。从这两个部门来看,它表明存在分配给非生产性活动的资金分配,并且对社会经济增长没有影响。因此,成为社会赋权的阻力因素是僵化的规范和同质化的活动,较少的人力,较少的社会化,社会对方案的获取度低且趋于霸权,社会只参与采取和实施活动,其结果就是简单地趋向于活动的形式化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Studi Pemberdayaan Masyarakat pada Program Dana Desa di Desa Pa’batangang, Kec. Mappakasunggu, Kab. Takalar
This article examines How the Design of the Society Empowerment Field Program, and the factors of resistor empowerment Field at Desa Pa’batangang, Kecamatan Mappakasunggu, Kabupaten Takalar. This phenomenon seeing that countryside fund policy is not maximum to superintendence it, by seeing of the indication of less involvement societies to the forum of countryside development plan, and the effects are many activities that unsuitable with society’s needs, and the execution of activity is not well presentation. In Permendesa PDTT number 11 years 2019 clause 5 concerning use priority countryside funds, it states that there are two sectors that become priority; countryside development and society empowerment which these two sectors should run simultaneously. However, Society Empowerment Field Program become neglected, most of the utilization countryside fund only focused on physical project, staff like pretend resources potency which is exist in countryside. Whereas, towards build the autonomous countryside, it very important to have support from government that become beneficial. This article may useful for the government of Takalar regency, along expansion countryside fund program. Research informant: Head of Countryside, Staff, Technical Practitioner, and Societies. Research scientific used qualitative. Data aggregation through interview, observation, secondary data study. Researcher used Data analysis technique’s Miles and Huberman. Based on research, that the result of Program manifested in two sectors; development and society empowerment. From both sectors, it shows that there is Fund Allocation distributed on activity which is not productive and there is no impact on society’s economic growth. Thereafter, which become resistor factor of the society empowerment are rigid regulation and the homogeneous activity, less manpower, less socialization, society access to the program is low and tend to hegemonic, the society only involved in taking and implementing activity, and the consequence is simply tend to active formality.   
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Applying Performance Management in Public Apparatus Development at Regional Level Dimensions and Challenges of E-Government Applications in Bantaeng Regency Models and Challenges of Coordination in Regional Disaster Management The Policy of Coastal Waste Management: Case Study In Demak Regency The Effect of Service Information System Quality on the Intensity of Use of Digital Learning Service Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1